365FarmNet

Germany · www.365farmnet.com · 19 vendors

CLAAS 365FarmNet GmbH provides cloud-based software solutions for comprehensive farm management, enabling agricultural businesses to plan, control, monitor, analyze, and optimize their processes. The company offers practical applications for data recording, business intelligence, inventory management, operational data, fleet management, and precision farming. These solutions are integrated into the CLAAS connect platform, serving farmers in over 30 countries worldwide.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 19 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-07 · revision 2

19 direct vendors, 153 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

365FarmNet exhibits a high level of migration readiness, scoring 85, primarily driven by its active and explicit migration strategy. The company is in the process of discontinuing its "365FarmNet Farm Management Platform" by November 2026, in favor of the new "CLAAS connect" platform. This planned obsolescence and replacement indicate a proactive approach to modernizing its core offerings. The underlying "Cloud-based SaaS" nature of its products, coupled with the use of "REST APIs / Open Interfaces" and adherence to agricultural data standards like "ISOXML" and "AgIN," signifies an architecture designed for flexibility, interoperability, and ease of data movement. These technologies are foundational for seamless transitions and integrations. The "Vendor Geographic Diversity" across "8 unique countries" for "22 services" suggests a reasonably diverse vendor landscape, which typically reduces "Vendor Lock-in Risk" (though explicitly stated as "Unknown"). This diversity can simplify vendor transitions during a migration. Key challenges and unknowns include the absence of specified "Data Residency Requirements," which can be a significant factor in migration planning, especially for a company operating across multiple European countries. Similarly, the lack of data on the "Regulatory Environment" and "Financial Stability" means potential compliance hurdles or funding constraints for the migration cannot be fully assessed. Despite these unknowns, the clear strategic direction towards a new, globally available, cloud-native platform positions 365FarmNet with strong migration readiness.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

365FarmNet GmbH operates a SaaS cloud platform (farm management software) storing customer data on servers in Germany/EU. SOC 2 is a voluntary framework developed by the AICPA assessing security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of cloud service providers. While SOC 2 is not legally mandated in the EU, it is increasingly expected by enterprise customers and B2B SaaS providers as a trust signal. The company's customer base (agricultural businesses in Germany, France, Poland) may not currently demand SOC 2 reports, but the transition to CLAAS connect (a global platform in 30+ countries) increases the likelihood of enterprise customers requiring SOC 2 assurance. Risk is Medium because: (1) no SOC 2 report has been found publicly; (2) the company processes sensitive operational data for farming businesses; (3) the CLAAS group's global expansion increases enterprise customer expectations; (4) absence of SOC 2 may create competitive disadvantage and customer trust gaps.

Evidence: https://www.365farmnet.com/de/datenschutz/

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 (EU Directive 2022/2555, transposed into German law via BSIG-Novelle / NIS2UmsuCG) applies to entities in listed sectors meeting size thresholds. 365FarmNet GmbH operates as a digital/ICT service provider (SaaS farm management platform) and is a subsidiary of CLAAS KGaA mbH (a major agricultural machinery manufacturer). The company has 100+ employees in Berlin, which meets the 'medium enterprise' threshold (50+ employees). The key question is sector classification: (1) As a digital service provider (cloud computing/SaaS), 365FarmNet may qualify as an 'Important Entity' under NIS2 Annex II (digital providers category); (2) The food sector is explicitly listed in NIS2 Annex II — while 365FarmNet itself is a software company, it provides critical digital infrastructure to food production operations. The parent company CLAAS KGaA mbH almost certainly falls under NIS2 as a large manufacturing/food-sector-adjacent entity, and group-level obligations may cascade. Risk is Medium because the sector classification requires formal legal assessment — the company is not in a clearly listed sector (like energy or banking) but has strong arguments for inclusion as a digital provider or food-sector entity. Non-compliance with NIS2 carries fines up to €10M or 2% of global turnover.

Evidence: https://www.365farmnet.com/de/unternehmen/, https://www.bsi.bund.de/DE/Themen/Unternehmen-und-Organisationen/Informationen-und-Empfehlungen/Empfehlungen-nach-Angriffszielen/Industrielle-Steuer-und-Regelungssysteme/NIS2/nis2_node.html

EU Cybersecurity Act — Assessment Required

The EU Cybersecurity Act (Regulation 2019/881) establishes ENISA's mandate and a cybersecurity certification framework for ICT products, services, and processes. For SaaS providers like 365FarmNet, voluntary cybersecurity certification schemes (e.g., EUCS — European Union Cloud Scheme) may become relevant, particularly as the CLAAS connect platform scales globally. Currently, no mandatory certification applies to 365FarmNet's specific service category, but this may change as EUCS schemes are finalized. Risk is Low currently but warrants monitoring.

Evidence: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/certification/cloud

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

CLAAS 365FarmNet GmbH's financial resilience cannot be assessed on a stand-alone basis because no meaningful financial disclosures are publicly available. Prior to June 2024, the entity operated as a KG structure that qualified for HGB §264b exemption from filing individual accounts, being consolidated into CLAAS Group financials. Since the June 2024 conversion to GmbH, small-company filing rules (HGB §267/§267a) permit abridged balance sheet filings without a P&L. As a result, revenue, EBIT and equity for FY2021-FY2023 are not publicly disclosed. The key resilience factor is the 100% ownership by CLAAS KGaA mbH, a multi-billion-euro German agricultural machinery group (CLAAS Group revenue approx. €6.1bn FY2022/23 and €4.9bn FY2023/24), which provides capital backing and access to a global dealer/customer base. However, the 365FarmNet product itself is being sunset on 30 November 2026, with functionality being merged into the parent's CLAAS connect platform launched in October 2024. This effectively means the branded entity is being wound down as an independent commercial proposition, though the underlying software capability continues within the larger group. For counterparty risk assessment, the relevant credit is the CLAAS parent group rather than the subsidiary itself.

Key strengths: 100% owned by CLAAS KGaA mbH, a multi-billion-euro German agricultural machinery group, 11+ year development track record since 2013 founding, Recurring subscription revenue model (Farm, Fleet, Field connect modules), Brand consolidation into CLAAS connect provides access to 30+ country markets, Established installed base in Germany, Poland, France and Switzerland

Risk factors: 365FarmNet product is being shut down on 30 November 2026, New registrations already closed; effectively a wind-down entity, No stand-alone published financials — cannot independently verify profitability or solvency, Removal of permanently free tier under CLAAS connect could drive customer churn, Intense competition from John Deere Operations Center, Climate FieldView (Bayer), xarvio (BASF), and Trimble Ag, Historical context suggests years of unprofitability funded by CLAAS parent, Loss of original industry consortium partners (Bayer, BASF) who launched competing platforms

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report