Acodyne
Denmark · owned by MS71 Ventures ApS (Denmark) · acodyne.com · 14 vendors
Acodyne develops unmanned eVTOL aircraft for heavy payload logistics, specializing in autonomous aerial systems with ducted-fan technology for middle-mile cargo transport. The company offers aircraft capable of carrying 100-500 kg payloads with extended range and high-speed capabilities.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 4
Technology vendors
- Looker — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 11 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 4
14 direct vendors, 202 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 14
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Sweden: 5
- Greece: 1
- Australia: 4
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Acodyne's migration readiness is assessed as low due to several critical unknowns and identified risks. The internal tech stack is not detailed, making it impossible to determine its modernity, cloud-nativeness, or architectural flexibility (e.g., microservices, containerization), which are key factors for a smooth migration. Data residency requirements are also unknown, posing a significant challenge if strict geographical constraints exist for data storage and processing. The company faces a required NIS2 assessment, and the absence of certifications like ISO 27001 or SOC2 suggests that compliance efforts during migration could be substantial and costly. Despite the ambiguity of 'Total Vendors: 0', the fact that 32 services are provided by vendors whose HQ and owner countries are exclusively the United States points to a high risk of vendor lock-in and complexity in migrating these services or transitioning to new providers. The lack of public financial data also makes it difficult to assess Acodyne's capacity to fund a potentially complex and expensive migration initiative.
Compliance
6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
Danish Aviation Regulations — Assessment Required
As a Danish company developing and potentially testing UAVs, Acodyne must comply with Danish aviation authority regulations. High risk because non-compliance would prevent testing and operations in Danish airspace, which is likely critical for their development and business operations.
Evidence: https://acodyne.com
SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required
While not legally mandated, SOC2 may be commercially important if Acodyne provides cloud-based services (their eThor AI suite) or if customers require SOC2 compliance for vendor relationships. Risk is medium because lack of SOC2 could limit business opportunities with enterprise customers, but it's not a legal requirement.
Evidence: https://acodyne.com
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
ISO 27001 is not legally mandated but is highly valuable for aerospace/defense companies. Given Acodyne's defense logistics applications and AI systems, customers may require ISO 27001 certification. Risk is medium because while not legally required, it could significantly impact business development and customer trust, especially in defense and critical infrastructure sectors.
Evidence: https://acodyne.com
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 1.29M, EBIT DKK -256K, equity DKK 2.70M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 47.8K, EBIT DKK 7.43K, equity DKK 35.3K
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.