Act-On Software, Inc.
United States · www.act-on.com · 20 vendors
Act-On Software, Inc. provides a cloud-based marketing automation platform designed to help businesses manage online marketing efforts, generate leads, and track customer engagement. Its software-as-a-service product offers tools for email marketing, landing pages, social media prospecting, CRM integration, and analytics. The company focuses on delivering agile, AI-driven solutions to streamline marketing operations and improve campaign performance for B2B teams.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 60
- Digital Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Cookiebot (Cybot A/S) — Technology — Denmark
- Hitachi Rail — Transport & Logistics — Japan
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 18 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 20 sub-vendors.
- Act-On
- Marketing Automation
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 1
20 direct vendors, 262 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Israel: 1
- Japan: 1
- Spain: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Ireland: 2
- Poland: 4
- Austria: 1
Migration Readiness: 6/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Act-On Software exhibits a medium level of migration readiness. Strengths include an internal tech stack that incorporates several modern, cloud-based identity and collaboration solutions (Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra, Auth0), which are generally well-suited for cloud migration. Their product delivery model, characterized by "SaaS/cloud delivery" and the use of "REST APIs" and "Webhooks," suggests an architecture already leveraging cloud principles and API-driven integration, which can simplify the process of moving or refactoring services. The geographic diversity of their vendor base, with HQs in 6 different countries, implies a distributed vendor ecosystem that could reduce the risk of high vendor lock-in from a single provider, offering more flexibility during migration. However, weaknesses and unknowns limit a higher score. The presence of "WordPress" and "Elementor" in the internal tech stack, while widely used, could represent components that are not inherently cloud-native or containerized, potentially requiring more effort for modernization during a migration. There is no explicit information regarding the adoption of containerization or microservices, which are key enablers for highly agile and scalable cloud migrations. Furthermore, critical data points such as the regulatory environment, specific data residency requirements, and the company's financial stability (which impacts the budget available for migration initiatives) are not provided, limiting a full assessment of potential migration challenges and opportunities. The "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is unknown, and without knowing the total number of vendors or contract specifics, a precise assessment of vendor-related migration complexity is difficult.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.