Adversus ApS
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · adversus.io · 13 vendors
Adversus is a web-based dialer and CRM solution designed for call centers and sales teams. It provides tools for telemarketing, fundraising, and appointment scheduling, offering features like predictive dialing, lead management, and workflow automation to optimize call efficiency and manage interactions.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 38
- Digital Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Cookiebot (Cybot A/S) — Technology — Denmark
- Demandware — Technology — United States
- DLX A/S — Denmark
- and 10 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 13 sub-vendors.
- Adversus
- Email SPF
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 1
13 direct vendors, 203 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Netherlands: 1
- Denmark: 4
- Australia: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Poland: 1
- Sweden: 3
- Czech Republic: 1
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Adversus ApS exhibits moderate migration readiness. The current internal tech stack, relying on specific hosting providers like OVH (EU hosting for recordings) and DLX (application data hosting), suggests a potentially more traditional, non-cloud-native infrastructure. This could imply a higher effort and complexity for migration to modern cloud environments, as refactoring or re-platforming might be necessary. Critical data points such as specific data residency requirements, financial stability to fund a migration, and the exact nature and extent of vendor lock-in are unknown, which are significant factors in migration planning. Although the data states 'Total Vendors: 0', the reliance on specific hosting providers (OVH, DLX) for core infrastructure often indicates a degree of vendor lock-in. While the company has strong ISO/SOC 2 compliance tooling, ensuring these standards are maintained during and after migration could add complexity. The lack of explicit mention of cloud-native technologies (e.g., containerization, microservices, public cloud platforms) suggests that the current architecture may not be optimized for a seamless cloud migration.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 37.5M, EBIT DKK 9.47M, equity DKK 13.6M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 28.2M, EBIT DKK 7.72M, equity DKK 10.6M
- 2023: gross profit DKK 20.0M, EBIT DKK 4.33M, equity DKK 5.01M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.