Airtable
United States · airtable.com · 20 vendors
Airtable is a cloud-based platform that combines the functionality of a spreadsheet with the power of a relational database. It enables teams to build custom applications, automate workflows, and manage data without requiring coding knowledge. The platform also incorporates AI capabilities for various business operations.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 80
- Digital Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Anthropic, PBC — Technology — United States
- Castle — Cybersecurity — United States
- Demandware — Technology — United States
- and 17 more
Services catalogue
8 services in catalogue across 6 categories; runs on 20 sub-vendors.
- Workflow Automation
- Airtable
- Subscription analytics and revenue reporting
Insights
Last updated 2026-05-20 · revision 3
20 direct vendors, 275 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 16
- Denmark: 2
- Sweden: 2
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Canada: 9
- Netherlands: 3
- UK: 1
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Airtable exhibits exceptionally high migration readiness, primarily driven by its cutting-edge and cloud-native internal tech stack. The company extensively utilizes Amazon Web Services (AWS) and has adopted containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) and a microservices architecture (evidenced by gRPC, GraphQL, and REST APIs). This modern infrastructure, coupled with technologies like Node.js, TypeScript, and PostgreSQL, signifies a highly modular, portable, and flexible system that is inherently well-suited for migration, whether to different cloud regions, alternative cloud providers, or hybrid environments. Their existing adherence to stringent regulatory compliance standards (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR) also indicates established processes and expertise that would facilitate navigating compliance requirements during a migration. However, certain data limitations prevent a complete assessment. Information regarding Airtable's financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) is not available, which makes it impossible to gauge their capacity to fund a potentially large-scale migration. Data residency requirements are also unspecified; if strict requirements exist, they could introduce complexity to migration planning. The vendor relationship data presents conflicting information ("Total Vendors: 0" versus details of vendor countries and "Total Services: 11"). Assuming Airtable uses 11 services from vendors in 2-3 countries (United States, Denmark, Sweden), this suggests a moderate level of vendor diversity, which generally implies manageable, rather than prohibitive, vendor lock-in risks for migration. The specific vendor lock-in risk remains unknown. Despite these unknowns, the architectural choices and modern tech stack provide a very strong foundation for agile and efficient migration initiatives.
Compliance
5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
SOC 2 (source) — Compliant
Airtable has undergone SOC 2 Type 2 audits, which demonstrates strong internal controls for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. The low risk reflects their established audit program and the fact that SOC 2 Type 2 provides ongoing monitoring of controls effectiveness.
Evidence: https://www.airtable.com/company/trust-and-security
ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required
While Airtable has SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO certifications, there is no specific evidence of ISAE 3000 assurance engagements. As a technology platform that may provide services requiring assurance reporting, this could be relevant but requires further assessment to determine specific applicability and compliance status.
HIPAA (source) — Compliant
Airtable offers HIPAA compliance for healthcare customers handling Protected Health Information (PHI). While they have implemented necessary safeguards and offer Business Associate Agreements, the risk is medium due to the complexity of HIPAA requirements and the need for ongoing compliance monitoring in healthcare use cases.
Evidence: https://www.airtable.com/company/trust-and-security
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.