Alpine.js
United States · alpinejs.dev · 19 vendors
Wireable LLC is the company founded by Caleb Porzio, the creator of Alpine.js, to manage his open-source projects and build sustainable businesses around them. Alpine.js is a lightweight, open-source JavaScript framework that enables developers to add reactive and declarative behavior directly into their HTML markup, offering a simpler alternative to larger frameworks for enhancing web applications.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 63
- Digital Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Algolia — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 16 more
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 19 sub-vendors.
- JavaScript Framework
Insights
Last updated 2026-03-12 · revision 3
19 direct vendors, 179 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Poland: 1
- France: 1
- United States: 12
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Austria: 1
- Romania: 1
- Brazil: 1
Migration Readiness: 8/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Alpine.js exhibits a high degree of migration readiness, scoring 82. Its primary strength lies in its technical architecture: as a JavaScript framework, it is inherently highly portable. The core product consists of static assets distributed via CDNs, making it extremely easy and cost-effective to 'migrate' or deploy to virtually any hosting environment or cloud provider without significant refactoring. The underlying tech stack (Vanilla ES6+, HTML-first, reactive programming) is modern and cloud-agnostic. Internal tools like GitHub, Discord, and Twitter are SaaS solutions, which means Alpine.js itself does not need to 'migrate' these services. Weaknesses include the lack of financial data, meaning the company's capacity to fund any potential internal system migrations is unknown. Regulatory environment and data residency requirements are 'Not specified,' which could introduce unforeseen complexities if specific compliance mandates were to arise. While the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown, the nature of the services used (CDNs, GitHub) generally suggests low lock-in for a project of this type. The 'Total Services: 37' without a clear count of unique vendors leaves some ambiguity regarding potential dependencies.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.