Alupro

United Kingdom · www.alupro.org.uk · 14 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 14 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-16 · revision 1

14 direct vendors, 141 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Alupro exhibits low-to-medium migration readiness. The internal tech stack, centered around WordPress, is a traditional CMS and not inherently cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based. Migrating such a system to a modern cloud environment would likely require significant re-platforming or re-architecting efforts, increasing complexity and cost. Key information regarding regulatory environment and data residency requirements is 'Not specified,' which could introduce unforeseen compliance challenges during migration. Financial stability data (revenue concentration, growth history) is missing, making it impossible to assess Alupro's capacity to fund a potentially substantial migration project. The vendor relationships are ambiguous ('Total Vendors: 0' for 11 services from diverse countries); if external services are indeed in use, managing these relationships and potential contract complexities across 5 different vendor HQ/owner countries could add significant overhead to a migration. Vendor lock-in risk is 'Unknown,' posing a potential hurdle. While the use of Google Site Kit and Google Analytics suggests some familiarity with cloud-based services, this is limited to analytics and integration, not core infrastructure, and does not significantly boost overall migration readiness.

Compliance

6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

UK Companies Act 2006 — Assessment Required

Alupro is described as an 'industry funded, not-for-profit organisation' and a 'not-for-profit trade association.' As a limited company (Alupro Limited), it is subject to Companies Act 2006 requirements including annual accounts filing, confirmation statements, and director duties. Risk is Low as these are standard corporate governance obligations for a UK limited company, and there is no evidence of non-compliance.

Evidence: https://alupro.org.uk/about-us/, https://alupro.org.uk/privacy-policy/, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/

GDPR (source) — Partially Compliant

Alupro processes personal data of UK residents (members, local authority contacts, consumers, website visitors) and is subject to UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. Their Privacy Policy (last updated January 2026) is detailed and demonstrates active compliance efforts: they have a named Data Protection Compliance Lead, reference the ICO as supervisory authority, use a cookie consent management platform (CookieYes), and articulate lawful bases for all processing activities. Risk is rated Medium rather than Low because: (1) no formal ICO registration confirmation was publicly evidenced; (2) no independent audit or DPO appointment (formal DPO vs. compliance lead) was confirmed; (3) international transfer mechanisms are referenced but not fully specified publicly; (4) as a small not-for-profit, resource constraints may limit the depth of ongoing compliance monitoring. The consequences of non-compliance include ICO fines (up to £17.5M or 4% of global turnover under UK GDPR) and reputational damage.

Evidence: https://alupro.org.uk/privacy-policy/, https://alupro.org.uk/cookie-policy/, https://alupro.org.uk/about-us/

PECR — Partially Compliant

PECR governs electronic marketing, cookies, and electronic communications in the UK. Alupro sends marketing emails to members and subscribers and operates websites with cookies and analytics. Risk is Medium because: (1) Alupro explicitly references PECR compliance in its Privacy Policy for cookie management; (2) a cookie consent management platform (CookieYes) is deployed; (3) the organisation distinguishes between B2B (legitimate interests) and B2C (consent) marketing, which is PECR-compliant in principle; (4) however, no independent audit of PECR compliance has been evidenced; (5) the ICO has increased enforcement of PECR cookie requirements in recent years.

Evidence: https://alupro.org.uk/privacy-policy/, https://alupro.org.uk/cookie-policy/, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/2426/contents/made

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Alupro is a long-established (30+ year) UK-based, industry-funded not-for-profit trade association operating as a private company limited by guarantee. Its financial model relies on stable, subscription-style membership funding from aluminium producers, converters, packer-fillers, reprocessors, and exporters across the UK aluminium packaging value chain. This provides a durable and predictable income base, further supported by growing policy relevance from UK EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) reforms, Simpler Recycling, and the upcoming Deposit Return Scheme, all of which increase member demand for Alupro's advocacy, education, and technical services. However, as a small not-for-profit, Alupro typically operates close to break-even with limited profit buffer, and its small team creates key-person dependency risk. Member concentration is a further concern given the highly consolidated global aluminium can and packaging industry (Ball, Crown, Ardagh, Canpack), where the loss of even one large member could materially impact revenues. Policy transition risk also exists if DRS or EPR reforms cause some trade-body functions to be absorbed by scheme administrators or broader packaging bodies. Financial disclosures are limited as Alupro likely files small-company/filleted accounts at Companies House, so quantitative resilience cannot be fully assessed from public data.

Key strengths: Stable subscription-style membership funding base, Not-for-profit structure reduces profit-generation pressure, 30+ years of continuous operation demonstrating durable business model, Increased policy relevance from UK EPR, Simpler Recycling, and DRS reforms, Diverse member base across the aluminium packaging value chain, Continued membership growth (e.g., Promet joining in June 2026)

Risk factors: Small organisation with key-person dependency, Member churn risk from consolidation among large aluminium producers and can makers, Policy transition risk if DRS/EPR reforms absorb trade-body functions, No profit buffer as a not-for-profit running close to break-even, Grant/programme income variability tied to partner co-funding cycles, Limited financial transparency due to small-company filing exemptions

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report