AMS-IX Due Diligence

Run due diligence on AMS-IX: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

Netherlands · www.ams-ix.net · 34 vendors

AMS-IX (Amsterdam Internet Exchange) is a neutral, member-based association that operates multiple interconnection platforms worldwide. It enables internet service providers, telecom companies, and cloud providers to efficiently, securely, and cost-effectively exchange global IP traffic. This facilitates low latency and engaging online experiences for end-users.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 34 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-19 · revision 7

34 direct vendors, 254 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://www.ams-ix.net/ams/about-ams-ix

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

GDPR (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://www.ams-ix.net/ams/documentation/privacy-statement

Financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

AMS-IX demonstrates strong financial resilience rooted in its not-for-profit, association-owned structure and highly recurring revenue model. Port fees and membership fees from 800+ connected networks (ISPs, hyperscalers like Google, Meta, Netflix, Microsoft, Amazon, and CDNs) provide predictable cash flow with no single-customer concentration risk. As one of the top global interconnection hubs within the FLAP-D cluster (Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris, Dublin), AMS-IX benefits from strong network effects that reinforce member retention and switching costs. The cost-recovery pricing model reduces pressure to take on debt or pursue risky expansion, with equity conservatively built from retained surpluses. The organization has operated since 1997 with a strong technical reputation and very high uptime. However, structural headwinds exist: hyperscalers increasingly bypass public IXPs via private network interconnects (PNIs), competing European IXPs (DE-CIX, LINX, France-IX) exert price pressure on per-Gbps rates, and Dutch energy cost volatility since 2022 affects operating costs. Foreign ventures have had mixed results historically (Hong Kong operation discontinued). Revenue growth has historically lagged traffic growth in low-to-mid single digits due to the volume-up/price-down dynamic of the IXP industry. Note: Specific financial figures could not be verified in this research session as web access was blocked. Historical pre-2022 reports suggested annual revenue in the range of €15–20 million range, but these should not be treated as current figures.

Key strengths: Recurring revenue model from port and membership fees, Diversified customer base of 800+ networks with no single-customer dominance, Strategic position in FLAP-D interconnection hub, Not-for-profit/association ownership structure reducing financial risk, Strong network effects and high switching costs, Long operating history since 1997 with high uptime reputation

Risk factors: Direct peering/private network interconnects (PNIs) by hyperscalers bypassing public IXPs, Price compression from competing European IXPs (DE-CIX, LINX, France-IX), Volatile Dutch electricity prices since 2022 affecting operating costs, Mixed profitability of international ventures (Hong Kong discontinued), Regulatory compliance costs from NIS2 and EU critical infrastructure rules, Revenue growth lagging traffic growth due to per-Gbps price declines

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report