Assemblin Caverion Group

Sweden · www.assemblincaverion.com · 10 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 10 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 1

10 direct vendors, 199 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Assemblin Caverion Group exhibits a medium level of migration readiness. Opportunities for migration are suggested by their 'Internal Tech Stack,' which includes modern web platforms like Optimizely CMS and cloud-based tools such as Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating some familiarity with contemporary digital environments. Their 'Key Technologies' focus on areas like Predictive Maintenance with Artificial Intelligence, Remote Monitoring & Digital Solutions, and Data Centre Solutions, which often leverage cloud infrastructure, suggesting a potential readiness for cloud adoption. The absence of specified data residency requirements could also simplify migration planning. Additionally, the geographic diversity of their vendor headquarters (5 countries) for their 17 services might indicate a less concentrated vendor landscape, potentially easing transitions away from specific vendor solutions. However, significant challenges and unknowns exist. There is no data on the architecture of their core operational systems (e.g., monolithic vs. microservices, containerization), which is crucial for assessing technical migration complexity. The lack of financial data (revenue concentration, growth history) makes it impossible to assess their capacity to fund a substantial migration project. The 'Regulatory Environment' is not specified, meaning potential unknown compliance hurdles could arise. Crucially, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is 'Unknown,' which is a major factor as high lock-in could significantly complicate and increase the cost of migration.

Compliance

9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Swedish Work Environment Act — Assessment Required

As a Swedish-headquartered company with significant field operations (electrical, HVAC, plumbing, industrial installations), Assemblin Caverion Group is subject to the Swedish Work Environment Act and its subsidiary regulations. The company employs field technicians working in potentially hazardous environments (construction sites, industrial facilities, heights, electrical systems). Risk is Medium because: (1) field work carries inherent occupational health and safety risks; (2) the Swedish Work Environment Authority (Arbetsmiljöverket) actively enforces compliance; (3) the company's privacy notice references safety data collection (accidents) indicating active safety management; (4) no public enforcement actions have been identified.

Evidence: https://www.assemblincaverion.com/privacy-notice/, https://www.assemblincaverion.com/corporate-governance/ethical-business-conduct/, https://www.av.se/en/work-environment-work-and-inspections/acts-and-regulations-about-work-environment/

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

Assemblin Caverion Group publishes an Annual and Sustainability Report (referenced as 'Annual and Sustainability Statement 2025') and references sustainability governance, ESG commitments, and supply chain due diligence. ISAE 3000 is commonly used for third-party assurance of non-financial (sustainability/ESG) reporting, which is increasingly mandated under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Given the company's size (20,000 employees, 42 billion SEK revenue) and explicit reference to CSRD-driven supply chain due diligence, ISAE 3000 assurance on sustainability disclosures is likely required or already in place. Risk is Medium because: (1) CSRD mandates limited assurance (moving to reasonable assurance) for large companies; (2) the company explicitly references CSRD compliance efforts; (3) no ISAE 3000 assurance report has been publicly confirmed in available sources.

Evidence: https://www.assemblincaverion.com/sustainability/governance/, https://www.assemblincaverion.com/sustainability/overview/sustainability-governance/, https://www.assemblincaverion.com/investors/reports-and-presentations/, https://www.assemblincaverion.com/globalassets/investors/financial-reports/annual-reports/annual-and-sustainability-statement-2025-en.pdf

CSDDD (source) — Assessment Required

Assemblin Caverion Group explicitly references CS3D as a key regulatory driver for its supply chain due diligence. CS3D (adopted 2024) requires large EU companies to identify, prevent, and mitigate adverse human rights and environmental impacts across their value chains. With 20,000 employees and ~42 billion SEK revenue, the company meets CS3D thresholds. Risk is Medium because: (1) CS3D is being phased in (largest companies first, from 2027); (2) the company has proactively acknowledged CS3D and is developing compliance infrastructure; (3) penalties for non-compliance include civil liability and fines up to 5% of global net turnover.

Evidence: https://www.assemblincaverion.com/sustainability/governance/, https://www.assemblincaverion.com/corporate-governance/ethical-business-conduct/supplier-code-of-conduct-documents/, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024L1760

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Assemblin Caverion Group demonstrates strong operational financial resilience, evidenced by a sharp profitability turnaround in 2025 (adjusted EBITA margin +120 bps to 7.9%, net profit swinging from -SEK 590M to +SEK 1,254M) and exceptional cash generation (free cash flow SEK 3,707M, cash conversion 114%). The company benefits from Nordic market leadership, a diversified footprint across nine countries and four segments, and a growing recurring service revenue share (59%), which provides insulation from construction cyclicality. A strong order backlog of SEK 31.5B (9+ months of revenue) supports visibility into 2026. However, resilience is tempered by a highly leveraged capital structure typical of private-equity ownership under Triton. Net debt stands at SEK 13.9B against equity of SEK 11.0B, with SEK 1.19B in annual financing costs. Goodwill of SEK 27.2B represents over 60% of total assets, creating meaningful impairment risk if profitability deteriorates. Deleveraging is progressing (net debt down SEK 2.2B in 2025), and the sharp margin improvement plus 17 bolt-on acquisitions during 2025 suggest management is successfully executing merger integration and synergies. Restructuring risk remains in Norway (revenue -14%) and there is exposure to construction cycles, FX, and customer credit events (e.g., Serneke bankruptcy).

Key strengths: Nordic market leadership with ~SEK 41B revenue and ~20,000 employees, Strong cash conversion of 114-121% enabling active deleveraging, Rising recurring service revenue share (59% in 2025), Order backlog of SEK 31.5B provides 9+ months revenue visibility, Adjusted EBITA margin expansion of +120 bps to 7.9% in 2025, Diversified across 9 countries and 4 business segments, 17 bolt-on acquisitions in 2025 adding SEK 744M annual revenue, Growing exposure to structural themes: data centres, defence, grid, energy efficiency

Risk factors: Highly leveraged: SEK 13.9B net debt vs SEK 11.0B equity, Goodwill of SEK 27.2B (>60% of total assets) creates impairment risk, Private-equity ownership (Triton) with SEK 1.19B annual financing costs, Construction cycle exposure in installation/project business (41% of revenue), Norway segment revenue declined 14% amid restructuring, FX headwind of 2.1 pp on 2025 revenue from stronger SEK, Customer credit risk (e.g., Serneke bankruptcy exposure), Talent and wage-inflation risk in skilled-trades labour market, Geopolitical/recessionary exposure through Germany and Europe

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report