Atlassian Corporation Plc

Australia · owned by Independent (Australia) · atlassian.com · 45 vendors

Atlassian is a global software company that builds collaboration software for software, IT and business teams. The company develops AI-powered team collaboration tools including Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, and Loom to help teams work better together.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

29 services in catalogue across 11 categories; runs on 45 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 8

45 direct vendors, 378 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 10/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Atlassian exhibits exceptionally high migration readiness. Their internal tech stack is predominantly cloud-native, leveraging Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud Platform (GCP), along with containerization technologies like Kubernetes and Docker, and a microservices architecture. This foundation means they are already operating in a highly portable and flexible environment, making further migrations or re-platforming efforts significantly easier. The use of open-source technologies such as Apache Kafka, PostgreSQL, Cassandra, Elasticsearch, and Redis further reduces proprietary lock-in and enhances portability. From a regulatory perspective, Atlassian's existing compliance with stringent standards like GDPR, SOC2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP demonstrates a mature and adaptable compliance framework that can facilitate migration to new environments while maintaining regulatory adherence. Data residency requirements are well-managed through their existing multi-region AWS infrastructure, allowing for flexible data placement based on customer needs, which is a critical enabler for complex migrations. Financially, the company's strong and consistent revenue growth provides ample resources to fund any strategic migration initiatives. Regarding vendor lock-in, despite the contradictory 'Total Vendors: 0' data point, the explicit multi-cloud strategy (AWS and GCP) and reliance on open-source technologies for core infrastructure components indicate a very low level of vendor lock-in for their foundational technology stack. While specific vendor lock-in risk is stated as 'Unknown', the architectural choices strongly suggest high flexibility. The company's current state is essentially an advanced, cloud-native deployment, positioning them at the forefront of migration readiness.

Compliance

11 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

PCI DSS (source) — Compliant

Atlassian accepts credit card payments for its products and services, which requires compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

Failure to comply with PCI DSS could result in fines from payment card brands and a loss of the ability to process credit card payments. The risk is medium as a failure in their third-party processor's compliance could still have an impact.

Evidence: https://www.atlassian.com/zh/dam/jcr:ce8f5d87-3cc4-4010-a34f-67d3ea80be54/PCI_DSS-v4-SAQ_A-Atlassian_2022.pdf?cdnVersion=949, https://www.atlassian.com/dam/jcr:8299f779-2e8e-4c6b-887d-c636efcefe4f/PCI_DSS-v3_2_1, https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance/resources/eu-ai-act

Australian Privacy Act 1988 — Compliant

Atlassian was founded and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia. The Australian Privacy Act 1988 and its Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) apply to all Australian organizations with an annual turnover of more than AUD 3 million, which includes Atlassian.

As an Australian-headquartered company, non-compliance with the Privacy Act could lead to significant penalties and reputational damage in its home market. The risk of non-compliance is high due to the large volume of Australian customer and employee data processed.

Evidence: https://us.seibert.group/blog/security-in-atlassian-cloud-ensuring-robust-data-protection, https://www.atlassian.com/dam/jcr:89e1292d-4e01-4203-8d78-407ccbc304b9/security-at-atla, https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dtime%2Bin%2BAustralia&q=EhAqBdAUBhsnCmm-N_FasKYuGNiDldUGIjAPbtC86cUL3MqevlM16816V3P5sQLbTP7Ntzy_NxczSw4aqfQBwJX1M4g9BvAU8o4yAnJSWgFD, https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance/resources/ccpa, https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance/resources/australia-privacy-act, https://www.atlassian.com/trust/privacy/country

ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant

ISO 27001 is a globally recognized standard for information security management systems (ISMS). For a company of Atlassian's scale and global reach, this certification is essential for demonstrating a commitment to information security best practices.

Similar to SOC 2, a loss of ISO 27001 certification would damage customer confidence and could be a deal-breaker for many international and enterprise customers. The risk of non-compliance is medium due to the ongoing effort required to maintain the certification.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

Atlassian demonstrates strong financial resilience despite persistent GAAP operating losses. The company generates exceptional free cash flow of approximately $1.4B+ annually, driven by upfront annual/multi-year billings and a low-cost, product-led sales motion. With over 300,000 paying customers and no single customer representing more than 10% of revenue, the customer base is highly diversified, and more than 85% of revenue is recurring subscription revenue providing high visibility. The balance sheet is cash-rich, historically holding $2-2.5B in cash and marketable securities against approximately $1B in convertible debt, resulting in significant net cash. Non-GAAP operating margins are in the low- to mid-20% range and gross margins are 82-84%, typical of best-in-class infrastructure SaaS. GAAP losses are largely a function of heavy stock-based compensation (~25-30% of revenue), which is offset by aggressive buybacks that have driven stockholders' equity negative—a cosmetic rather than solvency concern. Growth has moderated from 34%+ several years ago to approximately 20% today, but Atlassian remains a rare $5B+ SaaS company still growing at that pace, having compounded revenue at ~30% CAGR over a decade. Competitive pressure from Microsoft, Notion, Linear, ServiceNow, and Monday.com, along with AI disruption risk, are the main headwinds, but Atlassian is investing heavily in Rovo (AI) to defend its position.

Key strengths: Very strong recurring subscription revenue (>85% of total), Best-in-class free cash flow generation (~$1.4B+ annually), 300,000+ diversified paying customers with no >10% concentration, Cash-rich balance sheet (~$2-2.5B cash vs ~$1B convertible debt), High gross margin (~82-84% non-GAAP), Sticky products deeply embedded in engineering workflows, Strong non-GAAP operating margins in low- to mid-20% range, ~30% revenue CAGR over a decade

Risk factors: Persistent GAAP unprofitability driven by $1.2-1.4B annual SBC, Negative shareholders' equity due to aggressive buybacks, Slowing growth trajectory (from 34%+ to ~20%, guiding high-teens for FY2026), Competitive AI pressure from Microsoft, Notion, Linear, ServiceNow, Monday.com, Founder key-person concentration via Class B super-voting shares, Macro-sensitivity in SMB/mid-market seat expansion and IT hiring cycles, Server product end-of-life migration disruption (largely played out)

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report