Authorize.Net
United States · www.authorize.net · 24 vendors
Authorize.Net is a leading payment gateway service provider that enables merchants to accept credit card and electronic check payments securely online, in person, or over the phone. It manages the submission of payment transactions to processing networks and offers features such as fraud protection, recurring billing, and mobile payment solutions. The company is a subsidiary of Visa Inc.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 83
- Digital Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Contentsquare — Technology — France
- Visa Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 21 more
Services catalogue
5 services in catalogue across 5 categories; runs on 24 sub-vendors.
- Payment gateway
- Payments
- Authorize.Net
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 1
24 direct vendors, 252 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 20
- France: 1
- Australia: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Italy: 1
- Austria: 1
- Israel: 2
Migration Readiness: 6/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Authorize.Net exhibits a medium level of migration readiness, primarily due to its modern, API-driven technology stack. The availability of comprehensive REST APIs, SDKs for iOS and Android, and a presence on GitHub for source code and SDK hosting, indicates an architecture that is well-suited for integration with new platforms and cloud environments. The existing PCI DSS compliance simplifies the process of migrating to compliant cloud infrastructure. A dedicated sandbox/testing environment further supports agile development and thorough testing during migration efforts. The geographic diversity of its vendor base (5 countries) could also reduce complexity if vendor-specific integrations need to be re-platformed. However, several factors introduce uncertainty and potential challenges. The inferred use of "Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)" suggests the presence of a more traditional Content Management System, which might be a monolithic component requiring significant refactoring or re-platforming during a move to a fully cloud-native, microservices architecture. The assessment lacks explicit information on whether the current architecture is containerized or based on microservices, which are key indicators of advanced cloud readiness. Crucially, data residency requirements are "Not specified," a significant unknown that could dictate specific cloud regions or architectural choices and add considerable complexity and cost to any migration. Financial stability, including revenue concentration and growth history, is also unknown, making it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a large-scale migration. Finally, while vendor geographic diversity is present, the "Unknown" vendor lock-in risk and the contradictory "Total Vendors: 0" entry make it challenging to fully gauge the complexity of disentangling from existing vendor relationships during a migration.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.