Avigilon
Canada · www.avigilon.com · 16 vendors
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 75
- Digital Resilience: 9
- Financial Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Demandware — Technology — United States
- HubSpot, Inc. — Technology — United States
- PutYourLightsOn — Australia
- and 13 more
Services catalogue
6 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 16 sub-vendors.
- HALO Smart Sensor
- Control Center
- Unity Access
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-16 · revision 2
16 direct vendors, 215 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Japan: 1
- France: 1
- Denmark: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Czech Republic: 3
- Japan: 3
- Brazil: 1
Migration Readiness: 8/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Avigilon exhibits high migration readiness, largely driven by its established 'cloud-native, serverless security platform' (Avigilon Alta), which leverages major cloud providers like AWS or Azure. This indicates significant internal expertise and infrastructure aligned with modern cloud adoption. The availability of 'Avigilon Alta Cloud Connectors' to integrate existing third-party cameras into their cloud platform demonstrates a pragmatic approach to migrating and modernizing legacy systems. The company's adherence to SOC 2 Type II, FIPS 140-2/201-2, and ISO 27001 certifications suggests a strong foundation for managing security and compliance during migration. However, several factors introduce uncertainty: 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown, which could complicate transitions. Critical information regarding 'Regulatory Environment' and 'Data Residency Requirements' is not specified, posing potential challenges for compliance and data governance during migration. Additionally, the absence of financial stability data makes it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a large-scale migration. While Avigilon has strong cloud offerings, the continued presence of a 'leading on-premise security platform' (Avigilon Unity) implies a potential internal on-premise footprint that might require significant migration effort.
Compliance
11 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required
Avigilon is a technology/digital infrastructure provider operating across EU member states, serving critical infrastructure sectors (energy, transport, government, healthcare, banking, data centers — all explicitly listed as target industries on their website). As a provider of cloud-based security services (Alta Cloud Security) and video management systems to EU-based essential and important entities, Avigilon may qualify as a 'digital provider' or 'ICT service management' entity under NIS2 Annex I/II. Motorola Solutions (parent) is a large enterprise well exceeding the 50-employee/€10M turnover thresholds. However, NIS2 primarily targets operators of essential/important services themselves, not necessarily their technology vendors — though managed security service providers and cloud service providers are explicitly covered. The risk is medium because applicability depends on how EU member states have transposed NIS2 and whether Avigilon's cloud services are classified as covered digital services. Non-compliance consequences include fines up to €10M or 2% of global turnover for important entities.
Evidence: https://www.avigilon.com/alta, https://www.avigilon.com/industry/critical-infrastructure, https://www.avigilon.com, https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/about/trust-center.html
HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required
Avigilon explicitly markets its security solutions to the healthcare industry (SSM Health case study, VA Hospitals case study, dedicated healthcare industry page). Video surveillance and access control systems deployed in US healthcare facilities may capture Protected Health Information (PHI) — e.g., video footage of patients, access logs to medical areas. If Avigilon's cloud services (Alta Cloud Security) store or process video/access data from US healthcare facilities, Avigilon may qualify as a Business Associate under HIPAA, requiring a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). The risk is medium because HIPAA applicability depends on whether the data processed constitutes PHI and whether Avigilon has direct access to such data vs. merely providing infrastructure. HIPAA penalties range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, with annual caps up to $1.9M per violation category.
Evidence: https://www.avigilon.com/industry/healthcare, https://www.avigilon.com/case-studies/ssm-health, https://www.avigilon.com/case-studies/va-hospitals, https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/about/trust-center.html
DHS SAFETY Act Designation — Compliant
Avigilon explicitly advertises 'SAFETY Act Designation' on its homepage under 'Compliance and certifications.' The SAFETY Act (Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act) is administered by the US Department of Homeland Security and provides liability protections for sellers of qualified anti-terrorism technologies. This designation is granted by DHS after rigorous review of the technology's effectiveness and the seller's quality assurance processes. The risk is low because the designation is publicly claimed and DHS-granted designations are verifiable through the DHS SAFETY Act registry.
Evidence: https://www.avigilon.com, https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/safety-act
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024: revenue USD 1.97B
- 2023: revenue USD 1.75B
- 2022: revenue USD 1.52B
Financial Resilience Score: 8/10
Avigilon's financial resilience is effectively that of its parent, Motorola Solutions (NYSE: MSI), an investment-grade company with FY 2024 total revenue of approximately USD 10.8 billion and strong free cash flow generation of about USD 2.4 billion. This backing provides Avigilon with access to R&D capital, expanded sales channels, and balance-sheet strength it never had as a standalone Canadian small-cap prior to its March 2018 acquisition for ~USD 1.2 billion. The Video Security & Access Control (VS&A) category, anchored by Avigilon, has grown from roughly USD 0.5B in 2019 to ~USD 2.0B in 2024, representing a CAGR of approximately 25-30% driven by both organic growth and bolt-on M&A (Openpath, Ava, Pelco, IndigoVision). The ongoing pivot to SaaS/recurring revenue through Avigilon Alta (cloud) improves quality of earnings, and NDAA-compliant/SAFETY-Act designated hardware positions the company well in U.S. federal and critical infrastructure markets where Chinese competitors are blocked. However, standalone Avigilon profitability, equity, and detailed financial metrics are not publicly disclosed post-acquisition, creating opacity for external stakeholders. The business faces competitive intensity from Axis Communications, Hanwha Vision, Bosch, Verkada, and cloud-native entrants, as well as semiconductor/hardware supply-chain exposure that affected VS&A margins in 2021-2022.
Key strengths: Backing of investment-grade parent Motorola Solutions (USD 10.8B revenue, USD 2.4B free cash flow in 2024), Strong double-digit revenue growth in VS&A segment (25-30% CAGR since acquisition), Recurring/SaaS pivot through Avigilon Alta cloud platform improving earnings quality, NDAA-compliant and SAFETY-Act designated hardware advantageous in U.S. federal and critical infrastructure markets, Structurally growing end-markets: physical security, AI video analytics, cloud access control
Risk factors: Opacity - no standalone financial disclosure post-acquisition, Concentration risk on parent Motorola Solutions strategic priorities, Competitive intensity from Axis, Hanwha, Bosch, Verkada, and cloud-native entrants, Semiconductor/hardware supply-chain exposure impacting margins, Antitrust/regulatory scrutiny including UK CMA 2019 decision on Motorola/Avigilon
Revenue by geography
- United States: 65%
- International (EMEA, APAC, LatAm): 25%
- Canada: 10%
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.