BeyondTrust

United States · www.beyondtrust.com · 32 vendors

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

BeyondTrust has an estimated 21% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

17 of BeyondTrust's 32 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

4 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 32 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 7

32 direct vendors, 307 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

BeyondTrust exhibits a medium level of migration readiness, characterized by a mixed technological landscape and significant regulatory unknowns. On the positive side, the company has an existing cloud footprint, utilizing Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) in its internal tech stack, which provides a foundational understanding and experience with cloud environments. Its product portfolio, particularly solutions like CIEM, ITDR, and AI Agent Security, aligns with cloud-native principles, suggesting internal expertise and strategic direction towards cloud adoption. Strong financial growth indicates the capacity to fund substantial migration projects. Additionally, the use of 48 services from vendors across 4 different HQ countries suggests a diversified vendor landscape, which could reduce vendor lock-in complexities during migration. However, significant challenges exist. The internal tech stack includes on-premises virtualization technologies such as VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V, indicating a hybrid environment where migrating these legacy components would require considerable effort and potential re-architecture. The most critical impediments are the major unknowns regarding regulatory compliance and data residency. The 'Assessment Required' status for GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, and ISO 27001, coupled with 'Low' confidence, means that specific data handling, security controls, and regional requirements are unclear. Furthermore, the inability to determine specific data residency requirements is a substantial gap, as these rules directly influence cloud region selection and architectural design, potentially necessitating complex data sovereignty solutions. These uncertainties significantly increase the complexity, risk, and planning effort required for a comprehensive cloud migration.

Compliance

15 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

FIPS 140-2 — Compliant

BeyondTrust Remote Support achieved FIPS 140-2 certification in April 2021, validated by NIST's Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP). FIPS 140-2 is a US federal standard for cryptographic modules, critical for government and regulated industry customers. Risk is Low because the certification is publicly verifiable on the NIST CMVP website and demonstrates that BeyondTrust's cryptographic implementations meet federal security standards.

Evidence: https://www.beyondtrust.com/trust-center/industry-certifications, https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/certificate/3881

ISO 27701 — Compliant

BeyondTrust holds ISO/IEC 27701:2019 certification (Privacy Information Management System), audited by A-LIGN, expiring August 21, 2026. ISO 27701 is an extension to ISO 27001 that specifies requirements for a PIMS, directly supporting GDPR accountability and privacy-by-design principles. This certification demonstrates that BeyondTrust has implemented a structured, audited privacy management system beyond basic policy documentation. Risk is Low because the certification is current, from a reputable auditor, and publicly verifiable.

Evidence: https://www.beyondtrust.com/trust-center/industry-certifications, https://assets.beyondtrust.com/assets/documents/Certificate-BeyondTrust-Corporation-2025-ISO-27701.2019.pdf, https://www.iso.org/standard/71670.html

HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required

BeyondTrust is not a healthcare provider, health plan, or healthcare clearinghouse (Covered Entity). However, as a provider of Privileged Access Management (PAM) and Remote Support solutions, BeyondTrust's products are actively used by healthcare organizations to manage privileged access to systems that may contain Protected Health Information (PHI). If BeyondTrust's cloud-hosted services process, store, or transmit PHI on behalf of healthcare Covered Entities, BeyondTrust would qualify as a Business Associate under HIPAA and would be required to execute Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) and comply with the HIPAA Security Rule. The risk is Medium because: (a) BeyondTrust explicitly markets to healthcare customers (solutions by industry page); (b) PAM tools by nature touch privileged access to systems containing PHI; (c) no public BAA or HIPAA compliance statement was found on the Trust Center or Privacy Center; (d) failure to execute BAAs where required carries significant regulatory and reputational risk. The absence of a public HIPAA compliance statement is a gap that warrants investigation.

Evidence: https://www.beyondtrust.com/solutions/industry, https://www.beyondtrust.com/trust-center/industry-certifications, https://www.beyondtrust.com/trust-center/cloud-security, https://www.beyondtrust.com/privacy-center

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

BeyondTrust demonstrates strong qualitative financial resilience through its subscription/SaaS business model generating predictable annual recurring revenue, estimated at approximately US $700-900M for 2023-2024 per third-party sources. The company has a robust market position as a Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant for PAM for seven consecutive years, with 75% of the Fortune 100 as customers, providing revenue stickiness and cross-sell opportunities across its Pathfinder Platform. However, resilience is materially constrained by high leverage typical of PE-owned businesses. Both Moody's and S&P have historically rated its debt as sub-investment grade (B/B2 range with stable outlook), meaning interest expense consumes a significant share of operating cash flow. Rising interest rates and 2018-vintage LBO debt create refinancing risk. Backing from Clearlake Capital and Francisco Partners provides capital access, but the December 2024 security incident affecting Remote Support SaaS (linked to the US Treasury breach) creates renewal and reputational risk. The lack of public audited financials limits transparency for stakeholders.

Key strengths: Recurring SaaS/subscription revenue model with predictable ARR, Market leadership - Gartner MQ Leader for PAM 7 consecutive years, 75% of Fortune 100 as customers, Backing from Clearlake Capital and Francisco Partners, Broad product platform (Pathfinder) enabling cross-sell, Estimated revenue ~US $700-900M (2023-2024, third-party estimates)

Risk factors: High leverage with sub-investment grade (B/B2) credit ratings, No public financial transparency - no audited statements, Intense competition from CyberArk, Delinea, Okta, Microsoft Entra, December 2024 security incident tied to US Treasury breach, Refinancing risk on 2018-vintage LBO debt amid higher interest rates, Interest expense consumes large share of operating cash flow

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report