Blumira

United States · www.blumira.com · 19 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 19 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-15 · revision 1

19 direct vendors, 293 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Blumira demonstrates high migration readiness. Their internal tech stack is predominantly cloud-native, built on Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Google Compute Engine, which provides a flexible and scalable foundation for migration initiatives. The use of REST API and and Open API suggests a modern, API-driven architecture that is generally easier to migrate and integrate. Active compliance management with Drata indicates established processes that can facilitate adherence to regulatory requirements during a migration. However, the assessment is limited by the absence of data on financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history), which is crucial for funding migration projects. Specific regulatory environments and data residency requirements are also not provided, which could introduce unforeseen complexities. While the strong reliance on GCP is a strength for cloud operations, it could also imply a degree of vendor lock-in if a migration away from the GCP ecosystem were contemplated, although migration within cloud environments would be highly facilitated. The "Total Vendors: 0" data point is unclear, but assuming GCP as a primary infrastructure vendor, this concentration could be a factor in complex multi-cloud migration scenarios.

Compliance

9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

CJIS Security Policy — Assessment Required

Blumira explicitly markets CJIS (Criminal Justice Information Services) compliance support and targets state and local government customers. CJIS Security Policy applies to any entity that accesses, processes, stores, or transmits Criminal Justice Information (CJI). If Blumira's platform ingests logs from law enforcement or government systems containing CJI, Blumira must comply with the FBI CJIS Security Policy, which includes stringent requirements for encryption, access control, personnel security, and audit logging. Risk is High because: (1) CJIS non-compliance can result in loss of access to FBI systems for government customers; (2) CJIS requirements are among the most stringent US data security standards; (3) Blumira explicitly markets to this sector.

Evidence: https://www.blumira.com/compliance/cjis-compliance, https://www.blumira.com/industry/local-government

FTC Safeguards Rule — Assessment Required

Blumira explicitly markets FTC Safeguards Rule compliance support and targets financial services customers (financial services, credit unions). The FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) applies to financial institutions under FTC jurisdiction. As a service provider to financial institutions, Blumira may be subject to Safeguards Rule requirements as a service provider that receives, maintains, processes, or transmits customer financial information. Risk is Medium because the primary obligation falls on the financial institution customers, but Blumira as a service provider must implement appropriate safeguards.

Evidence: https://www.blumira.com/compliance/ftc-safeguards-rule-compliance, https://www.blumira.com/industry/finance/, https://www.blumira.com/credit-unions

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

No ISO 27001 certification was found on Blumira's website, security page, or Trust Portal reference. Blumira's security page lists SOC 2 and PCI DSS compliance but does not mention ISO 27001. As a cloud security company handling sensitive customer log data and security telemetry, ISO 27001 would be highly relevant and expected by enterprise customers. The absence of ISO 27001 certification is a moderate risk for enterprise sales and customer trust, particularly for EU/international customers who commonly require ISO 27001 as a vendor qualification criterion. Risk is Medium because: (1) SOC 2 provides overlapping controls coverage; (2) Blumira's primary market is US SMBs where ISO 27001 is less commonly mandated; (3) however, the lack of certification may limit enterprise and international market expansion.

Evidence: https://www.blumira.com/security, https://www.blumira.com/company

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Blumira is a privately held, venture-backed US cybersecurity SaaS company in the growth stage with no publicly disclosed audited financial statements. The company has raised approximately USD 30.9M in cumulative equity funding across seed, Series A ($10.3M in Aug 2021), and Series B ($15M in Jun 2023) rounds, providing runway to support continued growth. Its recurring SaaS revenue model with flat-rate, per-employee pricing offers predictable revenue, and reported customer retention indicators (99.7% CSAT, G2 Best Support badges) suggest low churn. However, as a Series B growth-stage SaaS company, Blumira is likely still burning cash, and the absence of public financial disclosure makes it impossible to verify profitability, burn rate, or runway. The company competes in a highly crowded cybersecurity market against larger, better-capitalized players like Arctic Wolf, Huntress, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Rapid7, and Sophos MDR. Its SMB customer segment is economically sensitive, and future growth depends on either reaching profitability or successfully raising a Series C in a tougher venture environment. The moderate score reflects solid backing and product traction balanced against opacity and typical growth-stage risks.

Key strengths: Cumulative ~$30.9M raised across seed, Series A, and Series B rounds, Recurring SaaS revenue model with predictable per-employee flat-rate pricing, Strong customer retention indicators (99.7% CSAT, G2 Best Support badges), Diversified go-to-market: direct SMB, MSP channel, Pax8 marketplace, Expanding product portfolio: SIEM → XDR → endpoint agent → ITDR → AI (SOC Auto-Focus), Compliance-driven demand tailwinds (HIPAA, CMMC, SOC 2, cyber insurance), 300+ customer organizations on the platform

Risk factors: No public financial transparency; revenue, EBIT, equity not disclosed, Likely still burning cash as a Series B growth-stage SaaS company, Highly competitive market with larger, better-capitalized rivals (Arctic Wolf, Huntress, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Rapid7, Sophos), SMB customer segment is economically sensitive to recessions, Dependence on partner ecosystems (Microsoft 365, AWS, MSPs, Pax8), Funding-market dependency; needs profitability or Series C in tougher VC environment

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report