Boelskifte & Rasmussen ApS

Denmark · owned by Don R. Invest ApS (Denmark) · boelskifte-rasmussen.dk · 12 vendors

Boelskifte & Rasmussen ApS is a Danish company based in Haderslev with approximately 15 years of experience specialising in demolition, environmental remediation (miljøsanering), and renovation of buildings of all sizes. The company offers a broad range of services including asbestos handling, soil contamination management, total demolition, selective demolition, construction site setup, and sand bed construction. They are asbestos-certified and operate a certified quality management system (KLS) with authorised professionals.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 8

12 direct vendors, 194 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

The company demonstrates medium migration readiness. Challenges include a tech stack primarily based on 'Drupal 11,' which, while modern, does not inherently suggest a cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based architecture, implying potential re-platforming efforts for a full cloud migration. The regulatory environment presents significant hurdles; GDPR compliance (with 'High' risk and 'Assessment Required') mandates strict EU/EEA data residency, complicating cloud provider and region selection. The potential applicability of NIS2 (with 'Medium' risk and 'Assessment Required') would impose additional cybersecurity requirements on any new infrastructure. Financial stability is unknown due to missing data, making it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a potentially costly migration. The conflicting vendor data ('Total Vendors: 0' vs. 'Vendor HQ Countries') creates uncertainty regarding vendor lock-in; if vendors exist, their number and contract complexity are unknown, which could impede migration flexibility. Opportunities include the use of a modern Drupal 11 version, which could simplify upgrades or transitions compared to older systems. If the 'Total Vendors: 0' data point is accurate, it would imply minimal vendor lock-in, offering significant flexibility in choosing new technology partners and platforms.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is a voluntary international standard for information security management. It is not legally mandated for Boelskifte & Rasmussen ApS's industry in Denmark. Risk is rated Low because: (1) the standard is voluntary, so non-certification carries no legal penalty; (2) the company's primary business is physical demolition and remediation, not information-intensive services; (3) no customer contracts requiring ISO 27001 certification were identified; (4) the company appears to be a small enterprise where the cost-benefit of full ISO 27001 certification may not be justified. However, as the company handles sensitive project data, employee health records, and environmental compliance data, basic information security controls are advisable. The company does have a KLS (quality management system) in place, which may incorporate some information security elements.

Evidence: https://boelskifte-rasmussen.dk/om-os, https://www.iso.org/standard/27001, https://www.ds.dk/da/standarder/iso-27001

EU Construction Products Regulation — Assessment Required

Danish Building Regulations (Bygningsreglementet BR18) and associated technical standards apply to demolition and renovation work in Denmark. Risk is Medium because: (1) non-compliance with building regulations can result in project stoppages and liability for structural failures; (2) the company performs demolition and renovation work that must comply with structural safety requirements; (3) however, the primary regulatory risk for this company lies in environmental and occupational health regulations (rated High above) rather than building regulations per se; (4) the company's use of authorised professionals ('autoriserede fagfolk') suggests awareness of these requirements.

Evidence: https://boelskifte-rasmussen.dk/selektiv-nedrivning, https://boelskifte-rasmussen.dk/screening, https://bygningsreglementet.dk/, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/1399

Danish Environmental Protection Act — Assessment Required

The company explicitly offers soil contamination handling ('Jordforurening') and environmental remediation ('Miljøsanering') services. These activities are directly regulated by the Danish Environmental Protection Act (Miljøbeskyttelsesloven, LBK nr. 5 af 03/01/2023) and the Soil Contamination Act (Jordforureningsloven, LBK nr. 282 af 27/03/2017). Risk is High because: (1) environmental violations can result in criminal prosecution and substantial fines; (2) improper handling of contaminated soil or hazardous materials can cause significant environmental damage with long-term liability; (3) the Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen) actively enforces these regulations; (4) the company's business model depends on maintaining environmental permits and authorisations; (5) EU Environmental Liability Directive (2004/35/EC) adds a further layer of liability for environmental damage.

Evidence: https://boelskifte-rasmussen.dk/haandtering-af-jordforurening, https://boelskifte-rasmussen.dk/miljoesanering, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/5, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2017/282, https://mst.dk/erhverv/affald/, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008L0098

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Boelskifte & Rasmussen ApS is a small Danish demolition and environmental-remediation contractor based in Haderslev. As a small ApS in Regnskabsklasse B, the company files abbreviated accounts that typically omit revenue disclosure, making it difficult to fully assess financial resilience quantitatively. No verified revenue, EBIT, or equity figures were retrievable in this session. Qualitatively, the company demonstrates strengths through a diversified service portfolio spanning demolition, asbestos removal, environmental remediation, renovation, and soil contamination handling. Key certifications (SIK asbestos certification, KLS quality management, DI membership) support its eligibility for public and large private tenders. An active project pipeline including industrial demolitions, hospital renovations, and retail new-builds suggests steady order intake into 2024-2025. The circular-economy angle through reuse of building materials aligns with tightening EU/Danish regulations. However, resilience is constrained by typical small-ApS risks: limited financial transparency, cyclicality of Danish construction (softened in 2023-2024 due to higher interest rates), regulatory/HSE exposure from stricter Danish asbestos authorization rules, geographic concentration in Denmark, customer concentration on general contractors, and key-person risk. Without quantitative financial data, a mid-range score reflects the balance between demonstrated operational strengths and unverified financial position.

Key strengths: Diversified service portfolio across demolition, asbestos, remediation, and renovation, Strong certifications: SIK asbestos, KLS quality management, DI membership, Active project pipeline into 2024-2025 including hospital and industrial projects, Circular-economy reuse of building materials aligned with EU regulations, 15 years of operational experience in the sector

Risk factors: Small ApS with limited financial disclosure and low transparency, Cyclicality of Danish construction market amid higher interest rates, Regulatory/HSE exposure with stricter Danish asbestos authorization rules, Geographic concentration in Denmark with no export activity, Customer concentration on general contractors and property developers, Key-person risk typical of small owner-managed ApS, Working capital and payment risk in Danish subcontracted construction

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report