Bubble Group, Inc.
United States · bubble.io · 20 vendors
Bubble is a visual programming platform that enables users to build powerful web and mobile applications without writing code. It provides a drag-and-drop interface for designing user interfaces, workflows, and databases. The platform aims to make app development accessible to non-technical users and entrepreneurs, allowing them to create and launch digital products efficiently.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 80
- Digital Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Anthropic, PBC — Technology — United States
- HubSpot, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 27 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 20 sub-vendors.
- Bubble
- No-code platform
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 1
20 direct vendors, 245 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 16
- Sweden: 1
- Singapore: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Spain: 1
- United States: 188
- Taiwan: 1
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Bubble Group, Inc.'s migration readiness score is 45, indicating a medium level of readiness with significant areas of uncertainty. The company benefits from a modern, cloud-hosted tech stack on Amazon Web Services (AWS), which is a strong foundation for migration. Existing SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance infrastructure suggests a capability to manage complex regulatory requirements during a migration. However, several critical unknowns significantly reduce the readiness score. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly stated as unknown, which is a major impediment to assessing migration feasibility and cost, as high lock-in could make migration extremely difficult and expensive. Similarly, 'Data Residency Requirements' are not specified, which could introduce significant challenges if strict requirements emerge during a migration. Financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) is also unknown, impacting the assessment of the company's ability to fund a potentially complex migration. While the company utilizes 31 services from vendors across 5 countries, the lack of clarity on the number of distinct vendors and the specific lock-in associated with these services makes a comprehensive assessment challenging. The absence of explicit mention of containerization or microservices, while potentially implied by a no-code platform, means the exact architectural flexibility for migration is not fully clear.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.