Builder.io Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Builder.io: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

United States · www.builder.io · 9 vendors

Builder.io is an AI-powered visual development platform and headless CMS that allows teams to create, optimize, and publish on-brand content and digital experiences for websites and applications. It provides a drag-and-drop interface and integrates with existing tech stacks, enabling collaboration between design and development teams to accelerate the creation of digital products.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 9 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-16 · revision 2

9 direct vendors, 162 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://www.builder.io/c/security, https://trust.builder.io

CPRA — Evidence found

Evidence: https://www.builder.io/legal/privacy

SOC 2 (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://www.builder.io, https://www.builder.io/c/security, https://trust.builder.io

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Builder.io is a well-funded private SaaS company with approximately US$140+ million raised across seed, Series A, and Series B rounds, backed by tier-1 investors including Greylock, M12 (Microsoft's venture fund), and Insight Partners. The August 2022 Series B raised ~US$36 million at a reported post-money valuation around US$450 million, providing meaningful runway. The company has a credible enterprise customer base including J.Crew, Harry's, Panasonic, Schneider Electric, Vimeo, and Zapier, suggesting recurring SaaS revenue with diversification across e-commerce, media, and enterprise tech. However, financial resilience is constrained by significant risks. The company operates in the extremely crowded AI-coding and design-to-code space competing with Vercel v0, Cursor, GitHub Copilot Workspace, Lovable, Bolt.new, Framer, and Webflow, while also facing headless-CMS competition from Contentful, Sanity, Contentstack, and Storyblok. Heavy dependence on third-party LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic) creates variable COGS and gross-margin pressure. No new priced round has been publicly announced since the 2022 Series B, meaning the company may need to raise again in a tougher late-stage funding market or push toward profitability. Complete absence of audited financial disclosure limits verification of financial health.

Key strengths: Well-funded with ~US$140M+ raised across seed, Series A, and Series B, Tier-1 investors: Greylock, M12 (Microsoft), Insight Partners, Series B ~US$36M at ~US$450M post-money valuation (Aug 2022), Enterprise customer base across e-commerce, SaaS, and industrial verticals, SOC 2 Type II compliance signals enterprise-readiness, Strategic positioning in AI-assisted coding and headless CMS/composable DXP, Technical credibility via open-source projects (Qwik, Partytown, Mitosis)

Risk factors: Private-company opacity — no audited financials available, Intense competition in AI-coding space (Vercel v0, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Lovable, Bolt.new, Framer, Webflow), Headless-CMS competition from Contentful, Sanity, Contentstack, Storyblok, AI cost exposure from dependence on third-party LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic), Unknown customer concentration risk in e-commerce vertical, Follow-on funding risk — no new priced round announced since Aug 2022 Series B, High burn rates typical in AI-coding segment

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report