Censys, Inc.

United States · censys.io · 27 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 27 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-17 · revision 7

27 direct vendors, 278 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Censys, Inc. exhibits medium migration readiness, primarily driven by a modern technical foundation but significantly hindered by critical unknowns and regulatory complexities. On the positive side, their multi-cloud presence (AWS, GCP, Azure) and use of modern languages (Go, Python) indicate a strong technical capability for cloud-native migration. The API/SDK infrastructure suggests modularity, which facilitates migration efforts. While their services are hosted in the US, there are no explicit data localization requirements beyond general GDPR considerations for EU data transfers, offering some flexibility. However, several factors reduce their readiness. The most significant impediment is the complete absence of financial data, making it impossible to assess their ability to fund a potentially costly and complex migration. The regulatory environment poses substantial challenges: GDPR compliance requires careful management of data transfers and processing locations, and the lack of public SOC2 and ISO 27001 reports means any migration would need to rigorously address these compliance frameworks, adding significant overhead and risk. The presence of WordPress in their tech stack could also represent a legacy component requiring specific migration planning. The 'Total Vendors: 0' data is ambiguous; if taken literally, it would imply no vendor lock-in, which is a huge strength. However, given 'Total Services: 25' and diverse vendor HQ countries, it's more likely they utilize vendors, and the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly 'Unknown', which is a critical gap in assessing migration complexity and potential costs associated with disentangling from existing vendor relationships.

Compliance

11 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required

Censys is a cybersecurity/internet intelligence company, not a healthcare provider, health plan, or healthcare clearinghouse. However, Censys explicitly markets its platform to healthcare organizations for HIPAA compliance support (Attack Surface Management for healthcare). If Censys processes Protected Health Information (PHI) on behalf of healthcare customers as a Business Associate, HIPAA's Business Associate Agreement (BAA) requirements would apply. Risk is Low because: (1) Censys's core product (internet scanning, attack surface management) does not inherently involve PHI; (2) Censys is not a Covered Entity; (3) Any PHI exposure would be incidental and limited to customer-specific deployments; (4) The company's primary data is internet infrastructure data, not health records. However, assessment is required to confirm whether BAAs are executed with healthcare customers.

Evidence: https://censys.com/resources/censys-compliance-programs/, https://censys.com/industries/healthcare/

DORA (source) — Assessment Required

DORA (EU Regulation 2022/2554) applies to financial entities and their ICT third-party service providers operating in the EU. Censys explicitly references DORA compliance support on its compliance programs page (Articles 8, 10, 11, 13 and ICT third-party risk management). As a cybersecurity/internet intelligence provider serving financial services customers in the EU, Censys could be classified as a 'critical ICT third-party service provider' under DORA if it meets materiality thresholds. Risk is Low because: (1) DORA's direct obligations fall on financial entities, not their vendors; (2) Censys would only be subject to DORA oversight if designated as a 'critical ICT third-party provider' by EU supervisory authorities; (3) Such designation requires significant systemic importance; (4) Censys is more likely to be a non-critical ICT provider subject to contractual DORA requirements from financial entity customers.

Evidence: https://censys.com/resources/censys-compliance-programs/, https://censys.com/industries/financial-services/

FedRAMP — Assessment Required

Censys explicitly serves US government customers and references FedRAMP-aligned compliance programs on its compliance page. The company has a dedicated 'Censys for Government' industry page and references national defense and military customers. FedRAMP authorization is required for cloud services used by US federal agencies. Risk is Medium because: (1) If Censys is actively selling to US federal agencies, FedRAMP authorization (or In Process status) would be required; (2) The compliance programs page references 'FedRAMP-Aligned Compliance Programs' suggesting awareness but not confirmed authorization; (3) Without FedRAMP authorization, Censys cannot be used by federal agencies for official purposes; (4) FedRAMP authorization is a significant competitive differentiator in the government market.

Evidence: https://censys.com/resources/censys-compliance-programs/, https://censys.com/industries/government/, https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Censys is a well-established, venture-backed private cybersecurity firm with a strong tier-1 investor base including Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital, Greylock Partners, GV (Google Ventures), Intel Capital, and Decibel Partners. The company recently raised a $70M Series D in March 2026 ($40M equity + $30M debt), which provides significant runway for growth and AI product development. Total funding to date is approximately $120M+ across multiple rounds. The company benefits from a large and sticky customer base, serving over 300,000 security practitioners and organizations representing more than 50% of the Fortune 500, with additional stability from federal/critical infrastructure customers such as CISA and DoD. However, financial resilience is difficult to fully assess because Censys is a private company that does not disclose revenue, EBIT, gross margin, burn rate, or equity figures. The inclusion of $30M in debt within the Series D round may signal a tougher late-stage funding environment or a deliberate choice to limit dilution. The company also faces significant competitive pressure from well-funded rivals including Shodan, BitSight, SecurityScorecard, Palo Alto Networks (Cortex Xpanse), Microsoft (RiskIQ), CrowdStrike (Reposify), Rapid7, and Recorded Future. Tightening enterprise cybersecurity budgets and likely customer concentration among large government and enterprise contracts add further risk. Overall, the company appears financially stable with strong backing, but the opacity of its financials limits precision in the assessment.

Key strengths: Tier-1 investor base (Morgan Stanley Expansion Capital, Greylock, GV, Intel Capital, Decibel Partners), $70M Series D raised in March 2026 ($40M equity + $30M debt), Total funding of approximately $120M+ to date, Large customer base: 300,000+ security practitioners and >50% of Fortune 500, Recurring SaaS revenue model across Censys Search, ASM, and Platform, Category leadership in Internet-wide scanning and ASM with ZMap technical heritage, Federal/critical infrastructure customers (CISA, DoD) providing multi-year contract stability

Risk factors: Opaque financials — no public visibility into revenue, burn rate, gross margin, or profitability, Debt component ($30M) in latest Series D may signal tougher funding environment, Intense competitive pressure from well-funded rivals (Palo Alto, Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Rapid7), Consolidation risk in ASM/exposure management market, Tightening enterprise cybersecurity budgets can slow ARR growth, Likely customer concentration in large government and enterprise contracts, International expansion is early-stage (formalized only in 2024)

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report