Center A/S
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · www.centerasecurity.dk · 7 vendors
Centera Security is a Danish software development company specializing in cybersecurity solutions for organizations in the Nordic region. They provide advanced threat detection for email and DNS, utilizing machine learning and cyber threat intelligence. The company aims to protect businesses from IT-related threats and fraud attempts.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 29
- Digital Resilience: 4
Disruption prediction
Center A/S has an estimated 13% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
4 of Center A/S's 7 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Cloudflare, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- Kriesi — Technology — Austria
- and 4 more
Services catalogue
5 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 7 sub-vendors.
- Personal Data Processing
- Innovation platform
- Email Service
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3
7 direct vendors, 127 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 3
- Denmark: 1
- Japan: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Singapore: 1
- Switzerland: 1
- Poland: 1
Migration Readiness: 2/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Center A/S demonstrates low migration readiness due to a critical lack of information across several key areas. The internal technology stack is completely unknown, making it impossible to assess the technical complexity, effort, and cost associated with migrating existing systems (e.g., whether they are cloud-native, containerized, or legacy/monolithic). Both the regulatory environment and data residency requirements are 'Not specified,' which are crucial factors that can introduce significant constraints, compliance challenges, and costs to any migration effort, particularly for a technology company. The company's financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) is also unknown, making it impossible to determine its capacity to fund a potentially costly and resource-intensive migration project. Furthermore, the statement 'Total Vendors: 0' contradicts the presence of 'Total Services: 9' and detailed vendor geographic information. This ambiguity points to a lack of clarity regarding the company's external dependencies. If external services are indeed utilized, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown' becomes a major potential hurdle, as disentangling from existing contracts or proprietary systems could be complex and costly. The lack of a clear count of unique vendors also makes it difficult to assess vendor concentration, which is crucial for migration planning. The geographic diversity of vendor locations (if vendors exist) is a minor positive but is overshadowed by the overwhelming unknowns.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 10.4M, EBIT DKK 2.94M, equity DKK 5.66M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 8.77M, EBIT DKK 1.44M, equity DKK 3.36M
- 2023: gross profit DKK 7.45M, EBIT DKK 350K, equity DKK 2.16M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.