Centera Security A/S
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · centerasecurity.dk · 6 vendors
Centera Security A/S, also known as Centera Cyber Security, provides leading cybersecurity solutions for organizations across Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. The company focuses on regionalized cyber threat intelligence and develops relevant solutions to enhance cyber threat detection capabilities. Their offerings include DMARC compliance, email defense, DNS defense, and secure email encryption.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 17
- Digital Resilience: 5
Disruption prediction
Centera Security A/S has an estimated 13% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
3 of Centera Security A/S's 6 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Fortinet, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- Kriesi — Technology — Austria
- and 3 more
Services catalogue
5 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 6 sub-vendors.
- Email Security
- Email Security / Email Hosting
- SPF-Protect
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 1
6 direct vendors, 123 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 4
- Austria: 1
- India: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 89
- Denmark: 3
- Sweden: 3
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Centera Security A/S exhibits low migration readiness primarily due to a critical lack of information across key assessment areas. The most significant challenge is the absence of data on their 'Internal Tech Stack,' making it impossible to determine if their current architecture is modern (cloud-native, containerized, microservices) or legacy and monolithic. This is a fundamental determinant of migration complexity, cost, and feasibility. Furthermore, there is no available information on their 'Regulatory Environment' or 'Data Residency Requirements,' which are crucial for defining compliance obligations and architectural constraints during any migration effort. The company's 'Financial Stability' (revenue concentration, growth history) is also unknown, preventing an assessment of their capacity to fund a potentially costly and resource-intensive migration. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly 'Unknown,' which is a major impediment. While they utilize 9 services from vendors in three different countries, the actual number of individual vendors and the complexity of their contracts are not specified, making it impossible to gauge the true extent of potential vendor lock-in, which can significantly hinder migration efforts. Without these critical data points, any migration planning would be highly speculative and prone to significant unforeseen challenges.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 10.4M, EBIT DKK 2.94M, equity DKK 5.66M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 8.77M, EBIT DKK 1.44M, equity DKK 3.36M
- 2023: gross profit DKK 7.45M, EBIT DKK 350K, equity DKK 2.16M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.