Centerasecurity
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · centerasecurity.dk · 6 vendors
Centera Cyber Security provides leading cybersecurity solutions for organizations in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. The company focuses on regionalized cyber threat intelligence and develops solutions for better cyber threat detection capabilities. Their offerings include DMARC Compliance, Email Defence, DNS Defence, and SecureMail, utilizing machine learning and cyber threat intelligence to protect against various IT-related threats.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 33
- Digital Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Cloudflare, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- Kriesi — Technology — Austria
- and 3 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 6 sub-vendors.
- Email Hosting
- Email Security
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 7
6 direct vendors, 127 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Denmark: 1
- Austria: 1
- United States: 3
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Lithuania: 1
- Sweden: 4
- Australia: 3
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Centerasecurity exhibits a medium level of migration readiness. The company's internal tech stack, featuring cloud hosting (likely AWS or Azure), Machine Learning frameworks, and API integrations, suggests a foundation that is somewhat amenable to cloud migration and modernization efforts. However, several significant challenges temper their readiness. The regulatory environment presents considerable hurdles, with GDPR and NIS2 identified as 'Assessment Required' and carrying high to medium risks. Any migration strategy would need to meticulously address these compliance requirements, which can add significant complexity, cost, and time. Furthermore, EU data residency requirements under GDPR impose strict constraints on where personal data of EU residents can be processed, limiting flexibility in choosing migration targets outside the EU/EEA without implementing robust protection mechanisms. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly stated as 'Unknown,' which is a critical gap in assessing migration readiness, especially given that 7 services are provided by external entities. Without clarity on vendor contracts, dependencies, and ease of switching, the potential for high lock-in remains a significant concern that could impede migration. The assessment is also constrained by the lack of financial stability data, which is crucial for determining the company's ability to fund a potentially costly and complex migration initiative. The contradiction in vendor count (`Total Vendors: 0` vs. `Total Services: 7` with diverse vendor HQs) also impacts the precision of vendor lock-in assessment, but the reliance on 7 external services from diverse locations suggests potential complexity in managing vendor relationships during a migration.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 10.4M, EBIT DKK 2.94M, equity DKK 5.66M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 8.77M, EBIT DKK 1.44M, equity DKK 3.36M
- 2023: gross profit DKK 7.45M, EBIT DKK 350K, equity DKK 2.16M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.