Centercode, Inc.
United States · www.centercode.com · 15 vendors
Centercode, Inc. is a cloud-based user testing automation platform that helps companies manage impactful in-the-wild user tests. It provides solutions for recruiting testers, streamlining test planning, automating engagement, and generating reports to improve product quality and user experience.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 67
- Digital Resilience: 7
- Financial Resilience: 6
Technology vendors
- Anthropic, PBC — Technology — United States
- Sage Intacct — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 12 more
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 15 sub-vendors.
- Beta Testing Management
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-29 · revision 1
15 direct vendors, 252 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Sweden: 1
- Denmark: 1
- Australia: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Finland: 2
- Czech Republic: 1
- Australia: 1
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Centercode exhibits high migration readiness due to its modern, cloud-native technology stack, primarily hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS). The platform's reliance on a REST API, webhooks, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (TED AI) suggests a modular and flexible architecture, which significantly simplifies potential migrations or re-platforming efforts. The existing implementation of SOC 2 Type II compliance and GDPR & CCPA tooling indicates a mature approach to data governance and security, which can streamline compliance aspects during a migration. Furthermore, the absence of specified data residency requirements provides greater flexibility in choosing migration targets. However, there are areas of uncertainty. While the company utilizes 16 services from vendors across 4 unique countries, the "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is unknown, which could pose challenges if critical services are tied to proprietary technologies or restrictive contracts. The ambiguous "Total Vendors: 0" entry in the vendor data also creates uncertainty regarding the true extent of external dependencies. The lack of data on financial stability (growth history or revenue concentration) also means the company's capacity to fund a significant migration effort cannot be fully assessed. Despite these unknowns, the inherent flexibility and modern nature of their core technology stack position Centercode favorably for future migrations.
Compliance
8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
SOC 2 (source) — Compliant
Centercode has achieved SOC 2 Type II certification, which is the most rigorous level of SOC 2 compliance (covering a period of time rather than a point-in-time assessment). This is explicitly stated on the company's Security & Compliance platform page and the Security legal page, with a downloadable SOC 2 report available at https://www.centercode.com/legal/soc-2-type-2-agreement. SOC 2 Type II certification demonstrates that Centercode's security controls (covering Security, Availability, and Confidentiality trust service criteria) have been independently audited and found effective over an audit period. Risk is Low because: (1) active certification is confirmed; (2) the company undergoes regular vulnerability scans, annual penetration tests, and third-party security audits; (3) infrastructure is built on AWS with AES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit.
Evidence: https://www.centercode.com/platform/security-compliance, https://www.centercode.com/legal/security, https://www.centercode.com/legal/soc-2-type-2-agreement
US State Privacy Laws — Partially Compliant
Centercode's Privacy Policy (effective May 30, 2025) explicitly references 'California and Similar State Privacy Laws,' indicating awareness of and intent to comply with multi-state US privacy regulations. The company's stated approach of extending California-equivalent rights to residents of other states with similar laws suggests a reasonable compliance posture. Risk is Low because: (1) Centercode is primarily a B2B platform (not a high-volume consumer data processor); (2) the company has demonstrated proactive privacy compliance culture; (3) enforcement of state privacy laws against B2B SaaS companies is relatively limited compared to consumer-facing businesses. The 'Partially Compliant' status reflects that while the policy acknowledges these laws, no state-specific compliance audits or detailed state-by-state analysis is publicly available.
Evidence: https://www.centercode.com/legal/privacy
CPRA — Compliant
Centercode is incorporated as a California corporation (Laguna Hills, CA 92653) and is therefore directly subject to CCPA/CPRA. The company explicitly addresses California privacy rights in its Privacy Policy (effective May 30, 2025), providing a dedicated 'California and Similar State Privacy Rights' section. The company confirms it does not sell personal data to third parties, provides rights of access, deletion, and non-discrimination, and offers a contact mechanism (privacy@centercode.com and 800-705-6540) for exercising rights. Risk is Low because the company has demonstrated active compliance with CCPA/CPRA requirements and has implemented the required disclosures and consumer rights mechanisms.
Evidence: https://www.centercode.com/legal/privacy
Financials
Three-year financials
- null:
Financial Resilience Score: 6/10
Centercode, Inc. is a privately held US-based SaaS company operating in the enterprise user/beta-testing category for approximately two decades. While no primary financial data is publicly disclosed (no SEC filings, no investor relations, no published funding rounds), several qualitative indicators support a moderately resilient business profile. The company maintains a blue-chip enterprise customer base including Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Dell, Ford, Disney, Intel, Salesforce, and SAP, which typically implies multi-year recurring SaaS revenue with high renewal rates. Category leadership is evidenced by multiple G2 Leader badges in Software Testing and Enterprise Test Management. However, resilience assessment is constrained by zero public financial transparency—profitability, cash burn, debt load, and liquidity cannot be verified. The company likely operates at under $50M in revenue based on private-company signals, meaning limited buffer against enterprise customer losses. Competitive pressure from better-capitalized players like UserTesting.com (acquired by Thoma Bravo in 2023), Applause, and Instabug poses a structural risk. The recent launch of Ted AI shows product investment into AI-driven testing, but AI could also commoditize aspects of the user testing category. Overall, the long operating history, SaaS recurring revenue model, and enterprise customer stickiness suggest moderate resilience, tempered by scale limitations and competitive dynamics.
Key strengths: Blue-chip enterprise customer base (Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Dell, Ford, Disney, Intel, Salesforce, SAP), Category leadership with multiple G2 Leader badges in Software Testing, Long operating history of approximately two decades, SaaS/recurring subscription revenue model with predictable revenue, Product expansion into AI with Ted AI launch, Proprietary Delta Testing methodology providing competitive differentiation, Likely bootstrapped/founder-owned with no publicized dilutive funding
Risk factors: Zero public financial transparency—no verifiable profitability, cash, or debt data, Small/mid-market SaaS scale (likely under $50M revenue) limits buffer against customer losses, Competition from better-capitalized players including UserTesting (Thoma Bravo-backed), Applause, Instabug, SurveyMonkey, Enterprise sales concentration risk—loss of a few large accounts could materially impact revenue, AI disruption risk that could commoditize aspects of user testing, No disclosed international diversification—US-centric operations
Revenue by geography
- United States: 0%
Revenue by product/service
- Managed Services: 0%
- Platform Subscriptions (SaaS): 0%
- Add-on/Next-gen Modules (Ted AI, Replays, App Store Distribution): 0%
Workforce by country
- United States: 0
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.