Centric

Netherlands · www.centric.eu · 15 vendors

Centric is a European IT services and software company headquartered in the Netherlands. It provides technological solutions, high-quality IT services, and qualified professionals to various industries, including public administration, supply chain, and finance. The company offers a broad portfolio of services, including software solutions, IT outsourcing, business process outsourcing, and staffing services.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Centric has an estimated 11% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

11 of Centric's 15 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

6 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 15 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-27 · revision 2

15 direct vendors, 215 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Centric exhibits high migration readiness. Their internal technology stack is already heavily invested in modern cloud platforms, specifically Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365, indicating a strong existing cloud adoption. Furthermore, Centric's product offerings include 'Modern Cloud' (built on Microsoft Azure) and 'Cloud Journey' services, which are structured cloud adoption and migration advisory services based on the Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework. This demonstrates deep internal expertise and a strategic focus on cloud migration, suggesting they possess the necessary skills, tools, and mindset for efficient transitions. Their 'Custom Software Development' capabilities also support bespoke migration projects. While their significant reliance on Microsoft Azure could imply a degree of platform-specific vendor lock-in, their expertise in managing cloud journeys likely mitigates this risk, as they are actively involved in guiding other organizations through similar transitions. The absence of data on specific regulatory environments, data residency requirements, and financial stability means these factors could not be fully assessed, but the available information strongly points to a highly prepared organization for digital migration.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

As a cloud services provider offering IT outsourcing, managed services, and data management solutions, SOC2 compliance would be valuable for demonstrating security controls to clients, especially those with US operations. While not legally required, it's often expected by enterprise clients for cloud service providers.

Evidence: https://centric.eu/en/solutions/it-outsourcing-and-management/modern-cloud/, https://centric.eu/en/solutions/it-solutions-datamanagement/

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

Centric operates in multiple sectors that may fall under NIS2 scope including digital infrastructure services, IT service management, and serves critical sectors like financial services and public sector. As a medium-to-large enterprise with operations across EU, they likely meet size thresholds. However, specific classification as Essential or Important Entity requires detailed assessment of their exact services and client dependencies.

Evidence: https://centric.eu/en/solutions/cyber-security-services/managed-threat-detection-response-services/, https://centric.eu/en/solutions/it-outsourcing-and-management/

GDPR (source) — Compliant

As an EU-based company processing personal data across multiple EU countries, GDPR compliance is mandatory. Centric demonstrates awareness through their Trust Center privacy section and explicit GDPR compliance statements. Medium risk due to the complexity of multi-country operations and data processing activities, but they appear to have established compliance frameworks.

Evidence: https://centric.eu/en/about-centric/trust-center/privacy/, https://centric.eu/en/about-centric/trust-center/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Centric is in the early innings of a private-equity-style turnaround following a multi-year shareholder dispute and Dutch Enterprise Chamber proceedings that included a court-appointed administrator of the shares. The September 2024 acquisition by Imker Capital Partners and an entrepreneur consortium (Mollie, Uniserver, ACT Group) introduces patient, self-funded capital and operational expertise, reducing refinancing risk and signalling a return to growth-via-acquisition (e.g., June 2025 majority stake in Twelve). However, profitability has not been publicly demonstrated: no EBIT, equity, leverage, or cash-flow figures are disclosed, and Dutch press has historically described the group as loss-making during the turbulent 2020–2023 period. Revenue has eroded from a ~€500M peak in the early 2010s to €425M in 2023. The near-complete C-suite refresh (CEO, CFO, CPTO, CISO within ~14 months) is necessary for turnaround but carries elevated execution risk. Critical-infrastructure customer base in Dutch public sector, retail, and financial services provides a sticky recurring-revenue foundation, but customer attrition during the ownership dispute will require multi-year trust rebuilding.

Key strengths: Critical-infrastructure customer base in Dutch municipalities, retail, and financial services with high switching costs, Scale of 3,100+ staff and 200+ software products in Benelux mid-market IT services, Diversified service mix across software, outsourcing, staffing, cyber security, and data/AI, New self-funded ownership (Imker Capital Partners) with long-term horizon and operational co-investors, Resumed M&A activity (Twelve acquisition June 2025) signals balance-sheet capacity

Risk factors: Recent history of crisis governance and multi-year shareholder dispute, Profitability not publicly demonstrated; historically loss-making per Dutch press, Customer attrition risk from Dutch municipalities and financial-services clients during ownership dispute, Near-complete C-suite turnover within 14 months elevates execution risk, Heavy geographic concentration in the Netherlands (likely >70% of revenue), Competition from larger system integrators (Capgemini, Accenture, Sopra Steria) and hyperscaler-aligned cloud services

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report