Clari

United States · www.clari.com · 19 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

9 services in catalogue across 5 categories; runs on 19 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-05 · revision 4

19 direct vendors, 192 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Clari exhibits high migration readiness. Their tech stack is highly modern and cloud-native, built on platforms like AWS, Snowflake, and Databricks, and incorporating advanced AI/ML/LLM capabilities. The description of their platform as a 'Cloud-based SaaS Platform' with 'API-based Integrations' and 'Real-time Data Processing' suggests an agile, microservices-oriented architecture highly conducive to flexible migration. Strong regulatory compliance, including GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001, demonstrates robust data governance and security practices essential for complex migrations. Furthermore, their excellent financial stability, evidenced by strong customer growth and high valuation, provides ample resources for funding significant migration initiatives. Potential challenges include the proprietary 'Revenue Database (RevDB)', which could introduce some level of lock-in if its data structures or integrations are highly specialized. The 'Vendor Relationships' data states 'Total Vendors: 0', which is inconsistent with the 'Internal Tech Stack' listing multiple external services. Assuming these tech stack components are vendors, Clari relies on several major cloud and SaaS providers. While these offer powerful services, they can introduce some level of vendor lock-in due to proprietary features and data formats, potentially complicating migration to alternative platforms. Clari's data residency strategy primarily involves US processing with Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) for EU data; however, specific customer data localization requirements could add complexity and cost to large-scale data migrations involving cross-jurisdictional data movement. The use of multiple databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server) and data warehouses (Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery) suggests a heterogeneous data environment, which, while flexible, can increase the complexity of data migration efforts.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant

Clari has achieved ISO 27001 certification for Information Security Management System, demonstrating strong security governance. This is a comprehensive international standard that reduces security risks significantly when properly implemented and maintained.

Evidence: https://www.clari.com/security/

GDPR (source) — Compliant

Clari is US-based but processes EU personal data through global operations and EU customers. They have implemented comprehensive GDPR compliance measures including ISO 27701 certification, dedicated EU representative, and detailed data processing procedures. Risk is medium due to the complexity of cross-border data transfers and the need to maintain ongoing compliance as regulations evolve.

Evidence: https://www.clari.com/gdpr/, https://www.clari.com/security/

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

While Clari has SOC 2 Type II compliance (which uses ISAE 3000 framework), specific ISAE 3000 assurance reporting requirements depend on customer contracts and regulatory needs. Risk is medium as some enterprise customers may require specific ISAE 3000 assurance reports beyond SOC 2.

Evidence: https://www.clari.com/security/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Clari demonstrates strong financial resilience indicators despite being a private company that does not disclose audited financial statements. The company has raised over $500 million in venture and private equity funding from top-tier investors including Sequoia Capital, Sapphire Ventures, Bain Capital Ventures, Silver Lake, Blackstone, Workday Ventures, and HubSpot Ventures. The January 2022 Series F of $225 million valued the company at approximately $2.6 billion, reflecting strong investor confidence and capital availability. The company's recurring revenue model with 1,500+ enterprise customers (including Adobe, IBM, 3M, Zoom, Okta) provides durable revenue streams typical of enterprise SaaS. Deloitte Technology Fast 500 rankings cited 264% three-year revenue growth in 2023 and 227% in 2024, indicating strong topline momentum. The platform manages over $5 trillion in revenue under management as of 2025, up from $4 trillion in April 2024. However, resilience is constrained by opaque financials with no public audited statements, likely GAAP losses typical of late-stage SaaS funding growth, and integration risk from the December 2025 Salesloft merger and prior acquisitions (Groove, Wingman, DealPoint). Competitive pressure from Salesforce, Gong, Microsoft, Outreach, and AI-native startups, plus heavy concentration in B2B SaaS/tech customers exposed to budget cycles, are notable risks.

Key strengths: Over $500M in total venture/PE funding raised, $2.6B valuation at Series F (January 2022), 1,500+ enterprise customers including Adobe, IBM, 3M, Zoom, Okta, 264% three-year revenue growth (Deloitte Fast 500, 2023), 227% three-year revenue growth (Deloitte Fast 500, 2024), $5 trillion in revenue under management on platform (2025), Four consecutive years on Inc. 5000 list through 2025, Leader in 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Revenue Action Orchestration, Strategic merger with Salesloft completed December 3, 2025, Top-tier investor base (Sequoia, Silver Lake, Blackstone, Bain, Sapphire)

Risk factors: No public audited financial statements (private company), Profitability and cash burn unknown; likely GAAP losses, Integration risk from Salesloft merger and prior acquisitions, Intense competition from Salesforce, Gong, Microsoft, Outreach, and AI-native startups, Heavy customer concentration in B2B SaaS/tech sector, Macro exposure to sales tech budget cycles, Single-use-case concentration in revenue/sales tooling

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report