ClearContract ApS Due Diligence

Run due diligence on ClearContract ApS: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by CL Holding & Invest ApS (Denmark) · clearcontract.dk · 7 vendors

ClearContract ApS is a Danish AI-powered contract automation platform that uses AI agents to receive, review, file, and monitor contracts on behalf of businesses. The platform covers the full contract lifecycle — including drafting, e-signatures, deadline monitoring, compliance scoring, and portfolio reporting — for legal teams, procurement, finance, HR, sales, and IT departments. It is GDPR-compliant, hosted on Microsoft Azure within the EU, and is designed for SMBs and enterprise legal professionals.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-06 · revision 3

7 direct vendors, 146 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

ClearContract ApS exhibits a moderate level of migration readiness. A significant strength is its cloud-native architecture, built on Microsoft Azure. This foundation, coupled with modern technologies like Generative AI and AI Agents, suggests a flexible and potentially portable system within a cloud environment. The use of Azure SQL and other Azure services indicates a well-integrated cloud ecosystem. However, several factors present challenges to migration. The "Medium" vendor lock-in risk is a primary concern, implying that disentangling from existing vendor relationships could be complex and costly. Strict regulatory requirements, specifically GDPR compliance and the explicit EU data residency mandate, impose significant constraints on potential migration targets and necessitate careful planning to maintain compliance throughout any transition. The ongoing need for a NIS2 compliance assessment, given its likely classification as an "Important Entity," adds another layer of regulatory complexity that must be addressed during migration. The absence of financial stability data also means the company's capacity to fund a potentially complex migration project cannot be fully assessed. While the tech stack is modern, the external dependencies and regulatory environment temper overall migration readiness.

Compliance

10 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Danish Marketing Practices Act — No public evidence

As a company conducting business and marketing its services in Denmark, ClearContract ApS is subject to the Danish Marketing Practices Act, which requires fair, transparent, and non-misleading commercial practices.

Evidence: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2017/426, https://www.consumerombudsman.dk/legislation/the-danish-marketing-practices-act/, https://en.kfst.dk/media/46758/mfl.pdf, https://www.njordlaw.com/corporate-law/guide-doing-business-denmark/marketing-and-competition-denmark, https://gorrissenfederspiel.com/en/our-services/marketing-law/good-marketing-practice/, https://www.clearcontract.dk/about

Danish Contracts Act — Evidence found

ClearContract ApS is a Danish company, and its business is centered on the formation and management of contracts, which are governed by the Danish Contracts Act (Aftaleloven).

Evidence: https://clearcontract.dk/blog/understanding-acceptance-in-danish-contract-law, https://clearcontract.dk/solutions/danish-contract-clause-compliance, https://www.legal500.com/developments/thought-leadership/the-danish-contracts-act/, https://www.clearcontract.dk/about, https://www.clearcontract.dk/acceptance-danish-contract-law, https://www.legal500.com/intelligence/denmark/corporate-commercial-law/the-danish-contracts-act

eIDAS Regulation — Evidence found

ClearContract ApS provides electronic signature services to EU customers, which are governed by the eIDAS Regulation. The company explicitly states its built-in e-signature solution is eIDAS-compliant.

Evidence: https://clearcontract.dk/solutions/e-signatures, https://clearcontract.dk/features, https://www.clearcontract.dk/platform/signing, https://www.clearcontract.dk/platform/overview, https://www.certinal.com/esignature-legality/denmark, https://kviksign.com/en/articles/elektronisk-underskrift-danmark-regler-og-lovgivning

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 3/10

ClearContract ApS shows significant financial fragility typical of an early-stage bootstrapped startup. As of FY2025, the company has negative equity of DKK -22.9K, which technically renders it balance-sheet insolvent and breaches Danish company law requirements where management must act if equity falls below half of the registered capital of DKK 40K. The net loss widened from DKK -1.5K in the stub period to DKK -61.4K in FY2025, and gross profit of DKK 59K is insufficient to cover total operating costs, resulting in an EBIT of DKK -78.7K. On the positive side, the company demonstrates clear product-market fit signals with approximately 120,000 contracts handled for notable enterprise customers including e-Boks, A.GAIN Capital, Incommodities, Admin by Request, and MFT Energy. The low operating complexity with only 2 employees and a cloud-based SaaS architecture keeps fixed costs minimal. Founder complementarity (law + cognitive science/ML) is well-suited to the AI contracts category, and GDPR/EU-hosting compliance provides a moat for European buyers. However, the bootstrapping funding model means runway depends entirely on cash flow and founder resources, with no disclosed VC round. Revenue is not disclosed under Danish micro-entity rules, making it difficult for external analysts to verify growth. The tiny headcount creates concentration risk around the two founders, and the competitive density in CLM (Ironclad, SpotDraft, LinkSquares, Juro, Icertis, DocuSign CLM, etc.) with heavily funded peers presents substantial strategic risk. Fresh capital or rapid turn to profitability is required in the near term.

Key strengths: Clear product-market fit with ~120,000 contracts handled for notable enterprise customers, Low operating complexity with only 2 employees and SaaS architecture, GDPR compliance and EU-hosted on Azure provides moat for European buyers, SOC 2 Type II compliance referenced, Strong founder complementarity (law + cognitive science/ML), Gross profit turned positive in FY2025 (DKK 59.1K from DKK -1.9K)

Risk factors: Negative equity of DKK -22.9K means company is technically insolvent on balance-sheet basis, Breach of Danish company law requirement (equity below half of registered capital of DKK 40K), Net loss widened sharply from DKK -1.5K to DKK -61.4K, Bootstrapping funding model with no disclosed VC round, Revenue not disclosed under Danish micro-entity rules, Tiny headcount (2) creates concentration risk around founders, Heavy competitive density with well-funded peers (Ironclad, SpotDraft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis, etc.), Return on assets deteriorated from -3.9% (2024) to -34.6% (2025), Solidity dropped from 100% (2024) to -12.9% (2025)

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report