Clerk, Inc. Due Diligence
Run due diligence on Clerk, Inc.: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.
United States · owned by Independent (United States) · clerk.com · 47 vendors
Clerk is a developer-focused authentication and user management platform purpose-built for modern web frameworks such as React, Next.js, and Remix. It provides drop-in components, APIs, and SDKs that allow developers to quickly add sign-up, sign-in, and user profile management to their applications. The company is backed by venture capital and serves developers and businesses looking to offload identity infrastructure.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 91
- Digital Resilience: 5
- Financial Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Clerk, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Notion Labs, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Twilio Segment — Technology — United States
- and 45 more
Services catalogue
6 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 47 sub-vendors.
- Search Engine
- Personal Data Processing
- Clerk.js
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 8
47 direct vendors, 304 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Ukraine: 1
- Canada: 1
- United States: 43
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Estonia: 1
- Portugal: 1
- Switzerland: 1
Compliance
5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
CCPA — Evidence found
Evidence: https://clerk.com/legal/ccpa, https://clerk.com/legal/privacy, https://clerk.com, https://clerk.com/legal
GDPR (source) — Evidence found
Evidence: https://clerk.com/legal/gdpr, https://clerk.com/legal/dpa, https://clerk.com/legal/dpf, https://clerk.com/legal/subprocessors, https://clerk.com/legal/privacy, https://clerk.com/legal
ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence
Evidence: https://clerk.com/legal, https://clerk.com
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024:
- 2023:
- 2022:
Financial Resilience Score: 8/10
Clerk is a well-capitalized private SaaS company with approximately $105M in cumulative funding raised across Series A ($15M, March 2023), Series B ($30M, January 2024), and Series C ($50M, October 2025). With a lean team of ~100 employees, this provides multiple years of runway even at elevated burn rates. The company's blue-chip investor base — including Andreessen Horowitz, CRV, Madrona, Menlo Ventures, Anthropic's Anthology Fund, Georgian, and Stripe — signals strong ongoing access to capital. Operating traction is exceptional: managed users grew from ~1 million in March 2023 to over 200 million by October 2025 (roughly a 200× increase in ~2.5 years) across more than 15,000 applications. This scale, combined with disciplined headcount growth, is often indicative of high revenue per employee in a SaaS infrastructure model. However, since Clerk is private and does not disclose revenue, EBIT, gross margin, burn rate, or net retention, conventional financial-statement analysis is not possible, and the resilience assessment relies on funding and traction proxies rather than audited financials. Key structural risks include intense competition (Auth0/Okta, AWS Cognito, Firebase, Supabase Auth, WorkOS, NextAuth), concentration in the JavaScript/React ecosystem, a generous free tier that pressures low-end gross margin, and a speculative bet on emerging 'Agent Identity' for AI. Private-company liquidity risk also remains for employees and early investors.
Key strengths: ~$105M cumulative funding raised through Series C (October 2025), Blue-chip investor base including a16z, CRV, Madrona, Menlo Ventures, Anthropic's Anthology Fund, Georgian, and Stripe, Managed users grew ~200× from 1M to 200M+ between March 2023 and October 2025, 15,000+ applications served, including notable customers like Browserbase, Inngest, Upstash, OpenRouter, Cartesia, Lean ~100-person team implying strong revenue per employee potential, SOC 2 Type 2 and CCPA compliance supporting enterprise upsell, Product expansion beyond authentication into billing, multi-tenancy, and Agent Identity
Risk factors: No public disclosure of revenue, EBIT, equity, gross margin, or burn rate, Intense competition from Auth0/Okta, AWS Cognito, Firebase Auth, Supabase Auth, WorkOS, and open-source alternatives, Generous free tier (50,000 monthly retained users) pressures low-end gross margin, Concentration in the JavaScript/React ecosystem creates framework-shift risk, Risk of auth being bundled into frameworks like Next.js or Supabase, Speculative commercial upside from early-stage 'Agent Identity' bet (IETF standards still in progress), Private-company liquidity risk for employees and early investors
Workforce by country
- Global (undisclosed split, majority US): 100
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.