Hackerman AB Due Diligence
Run due diligence on Hackerman AB: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.
Sweden · owned by Independent (Sweden) · codebahn.net · 6 vendors
Hackerman AB operates Codebahn, a fast and private GitHub alternative offering managed Git hosting and CI/CD for developers and teams. The company is headquartered in Gothenburg, Sweden, runs entirely on EU-only infrastructure with no US sub-processors, and is built on the open-source Forgejo forge. It is fully bootstrapped and customer-funded, with a strong focus on privacy, GDPR compliance, and European data sovereignty.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 67
- Digital Resilience: 5
- Financial Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Forgejo
- Oh Dear — Belgium
- Scaleway SAS — Technology — France
- and 5 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-10-27 · revision 2
6 direct vendors, 98 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Germany: 1
- United States: 1
- Switzerland: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Denmark: 4
- Australia: 2
- Sweden: 3
Compliance
7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
GDPR (source) — No public evidence
The company is established in Sweden, which is within the European Union, making the regulation directly applicable to all its processing of personal data.
ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence
This is a voluntary international standard for information security management. It is applicable if the company has chosen to seek certification to demonstrate its security posture to customers and stakeholders.
DORA (source) — No public evidence
The Digital Operational Resilience Act applies to financial entities and their critical ICT third-party providers. Applicability for Hackerman AB depends on whether it is designated as a critical provider to the financial sector in the EU.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: revenue SEK 949K, EBIT SEK 242K, equity SEK 1,920K
- 2024: revenue SEK 1,660K, EBIT SEK 636K, equity SEK 1,881K
- 2023: revenue SEK 1,023K, EBIT SEK 579K, equity SEK 1,766K
Financial Resilience Score: 7/10
Hackerman AB exhibits an exceptionally strong balance sheet for a micro-company, with an equity ratio of 96.4% in FY2024/25, near-zero short-term liabilities (TSEK 2), and a quick ratio of 41,050%. The company is self-funded, customer-funded, and debt-free, holding TSEK 713 in cash plus TSEK 1,500 in long-standing financial fixed assets against total assets of TSEK 2,321. It remains profitable (net profit TSEK 188) despite a sharp revenue contraction, and continues to retain earnings while distributing a proposed TSEK 300 dividend. However, resilience is tempered by extreme operational scale risks. The company has only one employee (the founder/owner), creating acute key-person risk. Revenue is volatile and declining (−43% YoY in FY2024/25), and the company competes against vastly larger players (GitHub/Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian). Infrastructure dependency on Scaleway and Hetzner, combined with sub-scale revenue of roughly SEK 1M annually, limits pricing power and R&D firepower. The fortress balance sheet provides substantial runway, but commercial traction remains unproven at scale.
Key strengths: Equity ratio of 96.4% (fortress balance sheet), Near-zero debt with quick ratio of 41,050%, Cash balance of TSEK 713 vs trivial payables, Self-funded and customer-funded, no outside capital needed, Consistently profitable with retained earnings growth, Strategic positioning on EU digital sovereignty / NIS2 wave
Risk factors: Only 1 employee - extreme key-person risk, Revenue declined 43% YoY from TSEK 1,660 to TSEK 949, Margin compression: profit margin fell from 38.4% to 25.5%, Sub-scale competitor vs GitHub, GitLab, Atlassian, Infrastructure dependency on Scaleway (Paris) and Hetzner (Falkenstein), Still finding commercial footing - revenue was nil before FY2022/23, Minimal share capital of TSEK 50
Revenue by geography
- Europe (undisclosed split): 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Codebahn (Git/CI SaaS): 100%
Workforce by country
- Sweden: 1
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.