Cribl

United States · cribl.io · 55 vendors

Cribl, Inc. provides a data platform that empowers IT and security teams to manage and analyze telemetry data. Its product suite, including Stream, Edge, Search, and Lake, allows organizations to collect, process, route, store, and analyze data from any source to any destination. This enables businesses to optimize their data infrastructure, improve security, and gain better insights from their data.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 55 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-15 · revision 10

55 direct vendors, 382 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 7/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Cribl exhibits high migration readiness, scoring 65 out of 100. The most significant strength is its exceptionally modern and cloud-native internal tech stack. The use of containerization (Docker, Kubernetes), infrastructure-as-code (Terraform), and support for multiple major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) positions Cribl ideally for seamless migrations. Their products are already offered as cloud-managed (Cribl.Cloud), indicating significant experience with cloud deployments and operations. The company's strong financial stability, with rapid revenue growth, ensures it has the necessary resources to fund and execute complex migration initiatives. However, several factors introduce complexity and potential challenges to migration readiness. The regulatory environment is a notable concern, with GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, and ISO 27001 all requiring assessment and carrying "Medium" risk. Data residency requirements are also marked as "Assessment Required." These compliance obligations will necessitate meticulous planning, potential re-certification, and careful data handling during any migration, adding to the complexity and cost. Regarding vendor relationships, the data states "Total Vendors: 0" but also lists "Total Services: 100" and "Vendor Geographic Diversity: 6 unique countries." While this presents an ambiguity, Cribl's multi-cloud strategy and reliance on open-source friendly technologies (Node.js, Go, Python, OpenTelemetry) suggest a low degree of platform-level vendor lock-in, which is highly beneficial for migration flexibility. The "Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown" for specific service vendors means this aspect cannot be fully assessed, but the overall tech stack points to a high degree of architectural flexibility.

Compliance

6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Partially Compliant

Cribl is a US-headquartered company that actively markets and sells to EU/EEA customers (evidenced by EU customer references such as CHRU de Tours in France and Swisslos in Switzerland, and a dedicated DORA compliance solution page). As a data pipeline and telemetry platform, Cribl processes and routes data that may include personal data of EU/EEA residents on behalf of its customers. Cribl publishes a Privacy Notice and references GDPR in its legal documentation. Risk is Medium rather than High because Cribl acts primarily as a data processor (not controller) for customer telemetry data, and has published privacy documentation. However, full compliance status cannot be independently verified without access to DPA agreements, SCCs, and internal audit reports. Enforcement risk is real given Cribl's EU customer base and the nature of its data processing services.

Evidence: https://cribl.io/legal/privacy-notice/, https://cribl.io/legal/, https://trust.cribl.io/home/, https://cribl.io/resources/cs/how-chru-de-tours-modernized-security-operations-and-cut-costs-with-cribl/, https://cribl.io/solutions/initiatives/dora-compliance/

HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required

Cribl is not a healthcare company, but it actively markets its platform to healthcare organizations (Yale New Haven Health is a named customer, and Cribl has a dedicated Healthcare industry page). As a data pipeline platform, Cribl may process Protected Health Information (PHI) on behalf of healthcare customers, making it a Business Associate under HIPAA. If Cribl processes PHI, it must execute Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) with covered entities and implement HIPAA-required safeguards. Risk is Medium because: (1) healthcare is an explicitly targeted vertical; (2) telemetry data from healthcare systems may contain PHI; (3) failure to comply as a Business Associate carries significant penalties. However, Cribl's on-premises deployment model means customers may self-host, limiting Cribl's direct PHI exposure.

Evidence: https://cribl.io/solutions/industries/healthcare/, https://cribl.io/resources/cs/yale-new-haven-health/, https://trust.cribl.io/home/

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 certification is common but not universal among cybersecurity vendors. Cribl's trust portal likely contains information about ISO 27001 status, but the portal requires JavaScript rendering and could not be fully accessed. Given Cribl's enterprise customer base (50% of Fortune 100), ISO 27001 certification would be expected and commercially advantageous. Risk is Low because even if Cribl does not hold ISO 27001 certification, its SOC 2 compliance (strongly indicated) covers overlapping security controls. The absence of ISO 27001 would not constitute a compliance violation but may be a commercial disadvantage in certain markets (particularly EU/UK enterprise sales).

Evidence: https://trust.cribl.io/home/, https://cribl.io/security/, https://cribl.io/vulnerability-disclosure-program/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Cribl demonstrates strong financial resilience for a private growth-stage cybersecurity/observability company. ARR has grown roughly 3x in 28 months, from $100M (Oct 2023) to $300M+ (Feb 2026), representing one of the fastest infrastructure-software ramps on record. The company is well-capitalized, having raised approximately $715M in equity across seed through Series E, including a $319M Series E in August 2024 at a $3.5B post-money valuation, providing substantial operating runway. Customer metrics reinforce durability: Net Dollar Retention exceeds 130%, indicating strong expansion within the existing base, and the company serves roughly 50% of the Fortune 100 and 130 of the Fortune 500 across 1,400+ total customers, reducing single-customer concentration risk. Multi-product adoption grew over 200% YoY to January 2025, suggesting platform stickiness beyond the flagship Stream product. However, resilience is capped by significant opacity. Cribl does not disclose GAAP revenue, operating income, cash burn, or shareholders' equity. As a growth-stage SaaS, it is likely still operating at a loss. ARR growth is decelerating (from >70% YoY in 2024 to ~50% YoY in 2025-2026), which is normal at scale but pressures the $3.5B valuation. Competitive pressure from Splunk (Cisco), Datadog, Elastic, and hyperscaler-native offerings, combined with the strategic risk of Cisco's Splunk ownership altering Cribl's original wedge, are meaningful headwinds.

Key strengths: ARR grew 3x in ~28 months ($100M to $300M+), Net Dollar Retention >130% indicating strong customer expansion, ~$715M total equity raised across seed through Series E, $319M Series E in Aug 2024 at $3.5B valuation providing runway, Blue-chip investor syndicate (Sequoia, Greylock, Redpoint, CRV, Tiger Global, GV, IVP), 50% of Fortune 100 and 130 of Fortune 500 as customers, Multi-product customers grew >200% YoY to Jan 2025, FedRAMP ATO achieved Jan 2026 opening federal market, M&A capacity demonstrated via CardinalOps acquisition (July 2026)

Risk factors: Profitability, EBIT, and cash burn not disclosed; likely still loss-making, No audited GAAP financial statements available (private company), ARR growth decelerating from >70% YoY to ~50% YoY, Competitive pressure from Splunk (Cisco), Datadog, Elastic, Sumo Logic, Grafana, and hyperscaler-native offerings, Splunk-dependent legacy positioning; Cisco ownership of Splunk could alter dynamics, $3.5B valuation implies aggressive future ARR growth expectations, ARR is a forward-looking metric, not GAAP revenue

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report