Cyberday

Finland · cyberday.ai · 23 vendors

Cyberday is an AI-assisted information security management system (ISMS) platform that helps organizations manage and maintain compliance across over 70 cybersecurity and regulatory frameworks in one structured system. The company's platform structures complex requirements into small, actionable tasks, integrates with tools such as Microsoft Teams and Slack, and generates automated reporting to demonstrate compliance.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 6

23 direct vendors, 283 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 7/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Cyberday's migration readiness is assessed at 65, indicating a moderate to good level of preparedness. The company's modern, cloud-native internal tech stack, utilizing platforms like Heroku, Microsoft Azure, and AWS S3, is a strong enabler for migration, suggesting architectural flexibility and familiarity with cloud environments. The existing ISO 27001 certification provides a solid framework for managing security and data integrity during any migration process. However, several factors introduce complexity. The regulatory environment is a significant consideration, with GDPR, NIS2, and SOC2 all requiring assessment or recommendation. Strict GDPR data residency requirements for EU residents mean any migration involving data movement must meticulously ensure data remains within the EU/EEA or adequate countries, adding a layer of geographical constraint and compliance overhead. Furthermore, while the use of multiple specialized SaaS vendors (e.g., Auth0, Datadog, Intercom, Twilio, Mailchimp) contributes to operational efficiency, it also introduces potential vendor lock-in for specific functionalities. Migrating away from these services would likely involve re-platforming or re-integrating similar capabilities, increasing the complexity and cost of a comprehensive migration. The financial capacity to fund a major migration is also an unknown, as revenue data was not provided.

Compliance

6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 9001 — Compliant

Cyberday explicitly confirms ISO 9001:2015 certification achieved in 2024. This is a voluntary quality management standard that demonstrates commitment to consistent service delivery and customer satisfaction. Risk is Low as the certification is active and confirmed. ISO 9001 is not a regulatory requirement but enhances customer trust and operational quality.

Evidence: https://cyberday.ai/security, https://cyberday.ai

ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant

Cyberday has been ISO 27001:2022 certified since 2021 (upgraded to the 2022 version of the standard). This is the highest-confidence compliance finding in this assessment, directly confirmed by the company's own security page with certification badge imagery. ISO 27001 certification requires annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification by an accredited certification body, providing ongoing assurance. Risk is Low because: (1) active certification is confirmed; (2) the company uses its own platform to manage the ISMS, demonstrating operational integration; (3) ISO 27001 is the gold standard for information security management and its maintenance requires continuous improvement. The main residual risk is that the specific certification body and certificate number are not publicly disclosed, preventing independent verification.

Evidence: https://cyberday.ai/security, https://cyberday.ai, https://trust.cyberday.ai/cyberday-inc

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

Cyberday is a cloud-based SaaS platform that stores and processes customer security management data, making SOC 2 highly relevant as a trust assurance framework — particularly for enterprise customers and those in regulated industries. The company has not publicly disclosed a SOC 2 Type I or Type II report. However, Cyberday does have ISO 27001:2022 certification (since 2021), which covers overlapping security controls. The risk is Medium because: (1) enterprise and regulated-industry customers increasingly require SOC 2 reports as part of vendor due diligence; (2) absence of SOC 2 may limit Cyberday's ability to serve US-market enterprise customers; (3) the company's own product supports SOC 2 as a framework for customers, creating reputational expectations. The ISO 27001 certification partially mitigates this risk.

Evidence: https://cyberday.ai/security, https://cyberday.ai/frameworks/soc-2-systems-and-organization-controls, https://trust.cyberday.ai/cyberday-inc

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Cyberday Inc. (formerly Agendium Ltd) is a small, privately held Finnish SaaS company operating in the ISMS/GRC space. While specific financial figures (revenue, EBIT, equity) are not publicly retrievable without accessing Finnish PRH/Virre filings, the company shows qualitative signs of moderate resilience. Its recurring subscription revenue model, high switching costs once customers embed the platform, and strong regulatory tailwinds (NIS2, DORA, EU AI Act, Cyber Resilience Act) support a stable revenue base. The company reports 600+ customers across 15+ countries, suggesting a diversified customer base likely in the low single-digit €M ARR range. However, resilience is constrained by scale disadvantages relative to well-funded competitors like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Sprinto. The company appears bootstrapped or lightly funded with no publicly announced significant venture round, which limits go-to-market velocity. Its customer base is concentrated in Finnish SME and public sector segments with small ticket sizes, requiring high customer volume to reach material ARR. Additionally, regulatory-driven demand may normalize after 2026, and AI feature differentiation is quickly commoditized, requiring continuous R&D investment. Its own ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications and Nordic/EU data-sovereignty positioning provide credibility differentiators against US competitors.

Key strengths: Recurring SaaS subscription revenue model with high renewal rates, Strong EU regulatory tailwinds (NIS2, DORA, EU AI Act, Cyber Resilience Act), High customer switching costs once ISMS platform is embedded, Own ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certifications supporting enterprise sales, Nordic/EU data-sovereignty positioning differentiates from US competitors, Established local dominance in Finland (Digiturvamalli brand), 600+ customers across 15+ countries providing diversification, Broad framework coverage (80+ frameworks including ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, GDPR, SOC 2)

Risk factors: Intense competition from well-funded US rivals (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto), Scale disadvantage with no publicly announced significant venture funding round, Customer concentration in small-ticket Finnish SME and public sector, Regulatory-driven demand pull-forward may normalize after 2026, AI feature differentiation quickly commoditized, requiring continuous R&D spend, Limited direct international sales presence (relies on partner network), Small company size relative to larger GRC players (OneTrust, ServiceNow GRC, LogicGate)

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report