Danske Havne

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · danskehavne.dk · 13 vendors

Danske Havne is the trade association for Denmark's commercial ports, representing 48 member harbours including municipal, self-governing, joint-stock, and private ports. The organisation works to secure favourable political and regulatory conditions for Danish ports at local, national, and EU level, and provides advisory services, networking, and knowledge-sharing to its members. It is headquartered in Copenhagen and registered under CVR number 14582428.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-03 · revision 3

13 direct vendors, 151 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Danske Havne exhibits a medium-low level of migration readiness. The primary challenge lies in its internal tech stack, which is centered around WordPress for its CMS and a custom members-only login portal. This setup is typically not cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based, implying that a significant re-architecture and re-platforming effort would be required for a full migration to a modern cloud environment. The use of a custom WordPress membership area could introduce specific complexities and potential lock-in to the current platform and custom code. The regulatory environment presents another challenge: as an organization likely falling under the 'transport' sector, NIS2 applicability is probable, which would necessitate stringent security and resilience considerations during any migration, potentially increasing complexity and cost. Significant data gaps hinder a more precise assessment, including the absence of information on data residency requirements, which could impose strict constraints on cloud provider selection and data placement. Financial stability data (revenue concentration, growth history) is also missing, making it impossible to assess the company's capacity to fund a substantial migration project. Lastly, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is 'Unknown', and while 'Total Vendors: 0' is provided, other vendor data suggests external dependencies. If vendors are involved for the 16 services, the lack of clarity on the *number* of vendors and contract complexity makes it difficult to assess potential vendor lock-in, which is a critical factor in migration readiness. The use of Mailchimp, a SaaS solution, indicates some familiarity with external cloud services, but the core internal systems are less agile for migration.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

EU Sanctions Regulations — Assessment Required

EU sanctions against Russia are directly applicable to Danish port operations following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Danske Havne has publicly stated support for EU sanctions packages and actively advises member ports on compliance. The risk is High because: (1) sanctions violations carry severe criminal and civil penalties; (2) port operators are on the front line of sanctions enforcement (vessel calls, cargo screening, shadow fleet monitoring); (3) the complexity of evolving sanctions packages creates ongoing compliance risk; (4) Danske Havne's advisory role means it must provide accurate and current guidance to 48 member ports. The association has published formal positions on sanctions simplification.

Evidence: https://danskehavne.dk/nyheder/2026/01/sanktioner-mod-rusland-2/, https://www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/sanctions, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0833

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is an internationally recognised information security management standard. While not legally mandatory for Danske Havne, it is highly relevant given: (1) The organisation represents critical national infrastructure (48 commercial ports handling 58.4 million tonnes of cargo annually); (2) It operates a member login portal and handles sensitive member communications; (3) NIS2 implementation in Denmark encourages or may require ISO 27001-aligned security controls for entities in the transport sector ecosystem; (4) As an advocacy organisation with access to politically sensitive information (EU port strategy, sanctions policy, government relations), information security is operationally important. The risk is Medium because ISO 27001 is voluntary but its absence represents a reputational and operational security gap, particularly given the critical infrastructure context of the membership.

Evidence: https://danskehavne.dk, https://danskehavne.dk/om-danske-havne/, https://www.iso.org/standard/27001

Danish Environmental Protection Act & EU Environmental Regulations — Assessment Required

Environmental compliance is a core operational concern for Danish commercial ports. Danske Havne has a dedicated Climate and Environment Director (Camilla Rosenhagen) and has published multiple policy positions on environmental topics including CO2 neutrality, zero-emission hubs, dredging/disposal ('klapning'), and nature restoration. The risk is Medium for the association itself (as it is not a port operator), but High for member ports. Danske Havne's advisory and advocacy role on environmental matters is central to its mission.

Evidence: https://danskehavne.dk/nyheder/2026/01/co2-neutrale-erhvervshavne-og-zero-emission-hubs-i-2030/, https://danskehavne.dk/nyheder/2025/11/klapning-og-naturgenopretning-i-kystvandene/, https://danskehavne.dk/nyheder/2026/01/eus-havnestrategi/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Danske Havne is a Danish trade/industry association (brancheorganisation) for commercial ports, not a commercial operating company. Its financial resilience is underpinned by a stable, recurring funding model based on membership fees from Denmark's commercial ports, which are mostly municipal or self-governing public entities with very low churn. This produces predictable income and shields the association from commercial market risk, customer credit risk, and currency exposure typical of operating businesses. The association benefits from strong strategic relevance, as ports have gained profile through the green transition, offshore wind, energy security, and defense/preparedness themes. This supports political relevance and, indirectly, member willingness to pay dues. A broad associate-member and sponsor base (including Sweco, Jyske Bank, WSP, Rambøll, DLA Piper, Rohde Nielsen, Aggreko) provides a secondary income line. However, resilience is constrained by small scale: a trade association's balance sheet is modest and equity buffers tend to be limited relative to a downturn in dues. Revenue is concentrated on the Danish municipal port sector, and any structural change to Danish port governance (consolidation or privatization affecting fee scales) could impact income. As a non-commercial entity, it cannot easily scale revenue; growth is capped by member count and fee levels. Verified financial figures were not retrievable in this session.

Key strengths: Stable, recurring membership fee income from Danish commercial ports, Very low member churn (public/municipal port entities), Non-commercial mandate insulates from market, credit, and FX risk, Strong strategic relevance from green transition, offshore wind, and energy security themes, Broad associate-member and sponsor base providing secondary income

Risk factors: Small scale with limited equity buffers, Revenue concentration in Danish municipal port sector, Structural risk from potential Danish port governance restructuring, Revenue growth capped by member count and fee levels, Limited public financial disclosure as a private association

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report