David DeSandro

United States · masonry.desandro.com · 8 vendors

David DeSandro is a designer and developer known for creating front-end development libraries. He is the creator of Masonry, a popular JavaScript grid layout library that arranges elements in an optimal position based on available vertical space. He develops and maintains various open-source projects, often under the brand Metafizzy.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 8 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-03-13 · revision 3

8 direct vendors, 162 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

David DeSandro exhibits medium migration readiness, leaning towards the lower end. Challenges include an internal tech stack that, while utilizing modern JavaScript, also incorporates legacy components such as jQuery and Bower. This suggests a potentially monolithic architecture without clear indications of cloud-native adoption (e.g., containerization, microservices), which would likely necessitate significant refactoring for a successful cloud migration. Financial stability and the ability to fund a migration are unknown due to missing revenue and growth data. Regulatory environment and data residency requirements are not specified, which could introduce unforeseen complexities and costs during a migration. The ''Vendor Lock-in Risk'' is explicitly unknown, but reliance on specific platforms like Gumroad for e-commerce/licensing could present migration challenges if alternative solutions are sought. The ''Total Services: 14'' suggests a non-trivial number of dependencies that would need thorough assessment for migration. Opportunities include the team's familiarity with modern development tools (Vanilla JS, npm, GitHub), which could facilitate the adoption of new cloud technologies. The open-source licensing (MIT, GPLv3) of their products suggests a culture that might be amenable to flexible technology choices, though this doesn't directly translate to internal migration readiness.

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a US-based software company with global reach through JavaScript libraries used worldwide, Metafizzy likely processes personal data of EU/EEA residents through website analytics, customer communications, and user interactions. While the company appears small, GDPR applies regardless of company size if EU personal data is processed. The risk is medium because: (1) GDPR fines can be substantial (up to 4% of annual turnover), (2) the company's global user base likely includes EU residents, (3) enforcement has increased significantly, but (4) the company appears to be a small operation which may have simpler data processing activities.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is relevant for technology service providers, especially those handling customer data. While not legally mandated, SOC2 compliance is increasingly expected by enterprise customers and can be important for business development. The risk is medium because: (1) lack of SOC2 compliance could limit enterprise sales opportunities, (2) customers may require SOC2 reports for vendor assessments, (3) the company processes customer data through its services, but (4) as a small company, the immediate business impact may be limited depending on customer base.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is a voluntary but valuable information security management standard. For a software company handling customer data and providing services to major organizations, ISO 27001 can provide competitive advantage and demonstrate security maturity. The risk is medium because: (1) lack of formal ISMS could expose the company to security incidents, (2) enterprise customers increasingly expect security certifications, (3) the standard helps establish systematic security practices, but (4) it's not legally required and the company appears to be small-scale.

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report