Digitaliseringsstyrelsen Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Digitaliseringsstyrelsen: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by Forsknings-, Uddannelses- og Digitaliseringsministeriet (Denmark) · digst.dk · 48 vendors

The Danish Agency for Digital Government (Digitaliseringsstyrelsen) leads Denmark's ambitious digital development, creating value for citizens, businesses and public organizations. The agency develops and maintains national digital infrastructure including MitID, Digital Post, and other digital government services.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 48 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 138

48 direct vendors, 351 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

13 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NSIS — Evidence found

Evidence: https://digst.dk/tilsyn/nsis/, https://digst.dk/it-loesninger/mitid/

EU AI Act (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://digst.dk/tilsyn/ai-forordningen/, https://digst.dk/kunstig-intelligens/kommunikation-paa-borgerdk-med-generativ-ai-assistent/, https://digst.dk/kunstig-intelligens/casekatalog-ai-loesninger-med-dokumenteret-effekt/, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689

Danish Public Administration Act — Evidence found

Evidence: https://digst.dk/om-os/love-og-regler/, https://digst.dk/om-os/whistleblowerordning/, https://digst.dk/om-os/offentliggoerelse-af-indkoeb/, https://digst.dk/om-os/privatlivspolitik/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 10/10

Digitaliseringsstyrelsen is a Danish central-government agency, not a commercial entity. Its counterparty risk is effectively Kingdom of Denmark sovereign risk (AAA), meaning there is no going-concern risk. Funding is set annually through the Finanslov approved by Folketinget, providing stable and predictable financial backing. The agency operates critical national digital infrastructure (MitID, Digital Post, NemLog-in, NemKonto, borger.dk) with near-universal adoption, making it structurally essential to the Danish state. Digitalisation is a top political priority in Denmark, and the agency's scope has been consistently expanding with new regulatory responsibilities (AI Act, NIS2, DSA supervision transferred in 2024-2025). Some solutions like MitID and NemLog-in are partly co-financed by user-organisations (private-sector service providers and public authorities), providing a semi-commercial funding leg alongside appropriations. The scale and criticality of its operations (94 million MitID transactions/month, 253 million Digital Post messages in 2025) make the agency essentially 'too critical to defund'. Risks are largely operational and political rather than financial. Vendor concentration risk exists with a small number of external suppliers (e.g., Nets/Nexi Group historically for the eID stack). The agency has moved between ministries multiple times, creating budget-line discontinuities. Cyber and operational risks are significant given the national criticality of MitID and Digital Post. Dependence on US hyperscale cloud raises digital sovereignty concerns that could force costly re-platforming.

Key strengths: Sovereign backing from Kingdom of Denmark (AAA), Annual appropriations set in Finansloven by Folketinget, Owns critical national digital infrastructure with near-universal adoption, Co-financing from user-organisations for MitID and NemLog-in, Structurally growing scope and transaction volumes, Strategic political priority for Danish government

Risk factors: Vendor concentration risk with small number of external suppliers, Political/organisational risk from repeated ministry reorganisations, Cyber and operational risk on nationally critical systems, Digital sovereignty exposure to US hyperscale cloud providers, Growing regulatory workload outpacing headcount expansion, Contract-renewal cycles causing spending volatility

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report