DI-Teknik

owned by Caverion Corporation (Finland) · di-teknik.dk · 12 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-17 · revision 1

12 direct vendors, 188 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

DI-Teknik exhibits low migration readiness (Score: 25) primarily due to the nature of its core business in industrial automation. Their extensive portfolio of products and key technologies revolves around Operational Technology (OT) systems such as SCADA, PLC programming (Siemens, Rockwell, Beckhoff), HMI, and robot programming (KUKA, Universal Robots). These systems are typically deeply integrated with physical hardware, often on-premise, and are not inherently cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based. Migrating such critical industrial control systems to a modern cloud environment would entail substantial re-engineering, specialized hybrid solutions, and significant cost and complexity. The company's reliance on specific vendor platforms within the industrial automation space (e.g., Siemens WinCC, Rockwell Automation, Beckhoff TwinCAT) for their services and potentially internal operations indicates a degree of vendor lock-in for these specialized components, further complicating migration efforts. While their internal web stack (WordPress, Elementor) and database programming (.NET / Visual Basic) could be migrated with relative ease, these represent a smaller portion of their overall technological footprint. Compliance requirements from the NIS2 Directive and IEC 62443, while beneficial for security, add stringent regulatory hurdles that must be navigated during any migration, increasing complexity. The absence of data on financial stability and data residency requirements also limits the full assessment of their capacity and constraints for a large-scale migration.

Compliance

10 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Machinery Directive — Compliant

As a provider of industrial automation and machinery solutions within the EU, DI-Teknik's products and services fall directly under the scope of the Machinery Directive (2006/42/EC).

Non-compliance for a company specializing in industrial automation could lead to severe accidents, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. Given their explicit offerings and certified experts, the likelihood of non-compliance is low, but the potential impact is high.

Evidence: https://di-trykluft.dk/koeling-ventilation/, https://automa.net/company/di-teknik-as, https://overit.dk/en/company/di-teknik-27581781/, https://prospeo.io/c/di-teknik-a-s-revenue, https://di-teknik.dk/en/core-business-areas/petrochemical-industry/

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

As a service provider dealing with client data and critical systems, an ISAE 3000 assurance report could be requested by customers to verify controls related to non-financial information, such as data protection or cybersecurity.

While not holding an ISAE 3000 report is a low risk, obtaining one, particularly for their GDPR or cybersecurity services, could provide a competitive advantage and enhanced customer trust.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

DI-Teknik is a large enterprise (101-200 employees) operating in the EU and providing services to essential and important entities, including manufacturing, food, pharmaceutical, and energy sectors, which are covered by the NIS2 Directive.

As a key supplier of automation and OT solutions to critical sectors, a cyber incident at DI-Teknik could have cascading effects on essential services. The risk is high due to the increasing targeting of industrial control systems.

Evidence: https://www.sauter-controls.com/en/privacy-policy/, https://prospeo.io/c/di-teknik-a-s-revenue, https://di-teknik.dk/en/, https://www.caverion.com/newsroom/releases/2022/caverion-acquires-di-teknik-as-one-of-denmarks-largest-automation-companies/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

DI-Teknik demonstrates strong financial resilience underpinned by substantial equity accumulation (growing 2.6x from DKK 39.9M in 2022 to DKK 104M in 2025 through retained earnings) and the strategic backing of Caverion Corporation, a pan-Nordic group with ~14,000 employees. Key ratios per Paqle place the company among the top performers in its industry: liquidity 189%, return on assets 18%, and solvency ratio 48% - all rated 'very good'. Bisbase ranks the company in the top 10% of its industry. The business model shows structural strengths: broad exposure to defensive, non-cyclical end-markets (water, wastewater, pharma, food, utilities), a vertically integrated total-supplier model that protects margins, and certified partnerships with Siemens and Rockwell Automation. However, FY2025 revealed notable margin compression with EBIT falling 26% and net profit 31% despite flat gross profit, suggesting cost pressures or restructuring. Workforce volatility (average employees dropping from 185 to 140 then rebuilding to 218) also indicates operational disruption during 2025. Revenue non-disclosure limits transparency, and geographic concentration in Denmark is a structural limitation, though offset by group-level diversification.

Key strengths: Strong equity growth of 2.6x over three years, entirely from retained earnings, Backing of Caverion Corporation (Finnish, pan-Nordic, ~14,000 employees), Defensive end-market exposure (water, pharma, food, utilities), Vertically integrated total-supplier model protecting margins, Certified partner status with Siemens and Rockwell Automation, ISO 9001 certified, Top 10% industry ranking per Bisbase, Solvency ratio 48%, liquidity 189%, ROA 18% (all rated very good)

Risk factors: Sharp margin compression in FY2025 (EBIT -26%, net profit -31%), Workforce volatility suggesting restructuring (avg employees dropped from 185 to 140), Revenue not disclosed - limits external transparency, 20% minority ownership stake outside Caverion complicates governance, Geographic concentration essentially 100% Denmark, Return on gross profit fell from 18.9% to 13.8% year-over-year

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report