Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut (DMI)

Denmark · owned by Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities (Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet) (Denmark) · dmi.dk · 68 vendors

DMI (Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut), or the Danish Meteorological Institute, is the Danish national meteorological service responsible for weather forecasting, climate research, and monitoring of the atmosphere, sea, and ice. It provides weather warnings, climate data, and free open data to the public and operates under the Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. DMI also conducts research on Arctic conditions, oceanography, and long-term climate change.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 68 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-03-08 · revision 41

68 direct vendors, 526 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

DMI's migration readiness is moderate, characterized by strong technical foundations but significant external constraints. The internal tech stack shows high readiness for cloud migration, with extensive use of Kubernetes, Docker, REST APIs, Python, and CI/CD pipelines, all hosted on a Kubernetes-based Danish Government Cloud (GovCloud). This indicates a mature approach to containerization and cloud-native development. However, specialized scientific models (e.g., Fortran, ECMWF IFS, HARMONIE-AROME) may present unique challenges for re-platforming or optimization in a new cloud environment. The most significant impediments to migration readiness are the stringent regulatory and data residency requirements. GDPR and NIS2 are 'High Risk' and 'Assessment Required', necessitating meticulous planning for data handling, security, and compliance during any migration. Danish national security legislation and EU data residency rules impose strict limitations on data location and cross-border transfers, particularly for critical infrastructure data and operations in Greenland and the Faroe Islands. While 'Total Vendors: 0' is contradictory, assuming the 'Total Services: 164' and 'Vendor Geographic Diversity: 12 unique countries' imply a complex vendor landscape, the 'Unknown' vendor lock-in risk is a major unaddressed factor that could significantly complicate or delay migration efforts. Consistent government funding provides stability but may lack the agility for rapid, large-scale migration investments without specific budget allocations.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 may be relevant for DMI due to: (1) Providing digital services and data to external organizations including aviation, maritime, and emergency services, (2) Processing and storing sensitive meteorological and climate data, (3) Medium risk as SOC2 is voluntary but increasingly expected for service providers, (4) Potential contractual requirements from service recipients, (5) Reputational benefits for demonstrating security controls to stakeholders.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a Danish government agency, DMI is subject to GDPR with high risk due to: (1) Severe financial penalties up to €20M or 4% of annual turnover for non-compliance, (2) High likelihood of processing personal data through employee records, website analytics, research participants, and public service interactions, (3) Strong GDPR enforcement in Denmark with active data protection authority, (4) Government agencies face additional scrutiny and reputational damage from non-compliance, (5) Complex data processing activities across weather services, research, and public communications increase compliance complexity.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

DMI likely qualifies as an Essential Entity under NIS2 due to: (1) Operating critical digital infrastructure for weather forecasting and emergency warnings that are essential for public safety, (2) Providing services critical to societal and economic activities including aviation, maritime, and emergency management, (3) High impact of service disruption on public safety and economic activities, (4) Strong NIS2 enforcement expected in Denmark with significant penalties for non-compliance, (5) Government agencies face additional regulatory scrutiny and must demonstrate cybersecurity resilience.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 9/10

DMI exhibits very high financial resilience primarily due to its status as a government institution. The vast majority of DMI's income (over 80%) comes from state appropriations, providing an exceptionally stable and predictable funding base, largely insulated from market fluctuations or economic downturns. As an essential public service provider for critical meteorological services, DMI ensures continued government support and funding. The consistent "Net Result for the Year" of DKK 1 million across multiple years demonstrates strong budgetary control and efficient management of resources within its allocated budget. DMI is not driven by profit maximization but by effective service delivery within its financial framework. While DMI generates some commercial income, it constitutes a smaller portion of its total revenue, providing diversification without significant market exposure. Furthermore, DMI's assets are ultimately state-owned, and its liabilities are backed by the Danish state, enhancing its financial stability and resilience against unforeseen financial shocks. The only minor factor preventing a perfect 5/5 (or 10/10) is the presence of commercial income, which, while beneficial, introduces a very small degree of market exposure compared to an institution funded 100% by the state. However, this exposure is well-managed and diversified.

Key strengths: Stable Funding, Essential Public Service, Budgetary Discipline, Limited Commercial Risk, State-Backed Assets

Risk factors: Presence of commercial income introduces minor market exposure

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report