DNSNODE AB

Sweden · www.dnsnode.com · 23 vendors

Netnod AB is a Swedish company that operates Internet exchange points (IXes) in the Nordics and provides global DNS services, including the advanced DNSNODE platform and one of the internet's 13 root name servers. It also distributes the official Swedish time through NTP.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 23 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-03-03 · revision 6

23 direct vendors, 252 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

DNSNODE AB's migration readiness is assessed as Medium (50/100). While there are potential advantages regarding vendor lock-in and data residency, the complete absence of information about the company's internal technology stack and financial capacity significantly hinders a robust assessment. Strengths: * Vendor Lock-in (Potential): The data explicitly states "Total Vendors: 0". If this is accurate, it implies an extremely low to non-existent vendor lock-in risk, which is a major advantage for any migration effort. This would significantly reduce the complexity and cost associated with disentangling from external providers. However, this contradicts the presence of detailed "Vendor HQ Countries" and "Vendor Geographic Diversity" data, and "Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown". For migration readiness, assuming minimal vendor dependencies based on "Total Vendors: 0" is a strong positive. * Data Residency Requirements: The data states "Data Residency Requirements: Not specified". This suggests a lack of explicit, known constraints, which could simplify migration planning by offering more flexibility in choosing cloud regions or data centers. Weaknesses and Unknowns: * Tech Stack: There is no information available regarding DNSNODE AB's internal tech stack or key technologies. This is the most critical missing piece for migration readiness. Without knowing if the systems are legacy, monolithic, or already cloud-native, containerized, and microservices-based, it is impossible to estimate the effort, complexity, and cost of a migration. This unknown significantly lowers the readiness score. * Financial Stability: No data is provided on revenue concentration or growth history. The ability to fund a potentially large-scale migration project is directly tied to financial stability, which remains unassessed. * Regulatory Environment: The regulatory environment is unknown. This could introduce unforeseen compliance requirements or complexities during a migration, especially if moving data across jurisdictions. * Vendor Data Contradiction: The contradiction between "Total Vendors: 0" and the detailed vendor geographic data, along with "Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown", introduces uncertainty. While "Total Vendors: 0" is interpreted as a positive for lock-in, the overall ambiguity around vendor relationships is a weakness. If there are indeed vendors, and their number is unknown, the actual lock-in risk could be higher than assumed. In summary, while the potential for low vendor lock-in and flexible data residency are positive indicators, the fundamental lack of insight into the company's technology architecture and financial capacity makes a high migration readiness score unattainable. The migration effort remains largely unquantifiable due to these significant data gaps.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

If DNSNODE AB provides cloud services, DNS hosting, or other technology services to customers, SOC2 compliance may be expected by clients, especially US-based customers. While not legally mandatory, it's often a business requirement for service providers. The medium risk reflects potential business impact from lack of certification rather than legal penalties.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

GDPR applies to all EU-based companies processing personal data. As a Swedish company, DNSNODE AB is subject to GDPR regardless of their specific business activities. Non-compliance can result in fines up to 4% of annual turnover or €20 million. Given that virtually all companies process some personal data (employee data, customer data, etc.), the likelihood of GDPR applicability is extremely high. The risk is elevated due to strict enforcement in Sweden and across the EU.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applicability depends on company size and sector classification. If DNSNODE AB provides digital infrastructure services, DNS services, or ICT service management, they could qualify as Essential or Important Entities under NIS2. The medium risk reflects uncertainty about their exact business model and size, but potential high-impact penalties if applicable (up to 2% of annual turnover for Essential Entities).

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report