Ember Labs
Denmark · owned by Hilaire Holding ApS (Denmark) · emberlabs.dk · 3 vendors
Ember Labs is a Danish company registered under the .dk country-code TLD. Its domain is currently hosted via One.com with no active public website, and insufficient public information is available to describe its specific business activities.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 33
- Digital Resilience: 5
Disruption prediction
Ember Labs has an estimated 17% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
1 of Ember Labs's 3 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- One.com Group AB — Technology — Denmark
- Varnish Software AB — Technology — Sweden
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-15 · revision 14
3 direct vendors, 53 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Sweden: 1
- United Kingdom: 1
- United States: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Canada: 1
- Denmark: 2
- Sweden: 1
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Ember Labs' migration readiness is assessed at 25 out of 100, indicating low readiness. The most significant challenge stems from the complete lack of information regarding its internal tech stack and key technologies. Without knowing if the current infrastructure is cloud-native, containerized, or relies on legacy monolithic systems, it's impossible to determine the technical effort and complexity required for a migration. A notable opportunity for Ember Labs is the absence of specified data residency requirements, which provides significant flexibility and potentially reduces a major hurdle often associated with complex migrations. However, this positive is heavily outweighed by other critical unknowns. The company's financial stability and ability to fund a potentially costly migration are unclear due to missing data on revenue concentration and growth history. Furthermore, the "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is unknown, which is a critical factor; high vendor lock-in (despite the inconsistent "Total Vendors: 0" data point) could significantly impede migration efforts by increasing costs, complexity, and dependency on existing providers for the 6 services identified. While there is vendor geographic diversity across three countries, managing these relationships during a migration could add administrative complexity. The regulatory environment is also unspecified, meaning potential compliance requirements for a new cloud environment are unknown, adding another layer of uncertainty. Overall, the profound lack of data on core technical and vendor-related aspects places Ember Labs in a low state of migration readiness.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.