Engly Security

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · engly.eu · 5 vendors

Engly Security is a personally owned Danish company registered in Sorø, specializing in investigation and private guard and security activities. The company was registered on May 1, 2025.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-01 · revision 38

5 direct vendors, 29 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 2/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Engly Security demonstrates low migration readiness, scoring 20. The most significant impediments to migration are the complex regulatory environment and stringent data residency requirements. As a Danish company, Engly Security is subject to GDPR and the Danish Data Protection Act, both assessed as 'High' risk with compliance gaps. These regulations impose strict requirements on personal data processing, data subject rights, and data breach notifications, which would add substantial complexity and cost to any data or system migration. Furthermore, explicit data residency requirements are in place, mandating EU/EEA storage for personal data, specific handling for Danish CPR numbers, and potential public sector client requirements for Danish data center hosting. These constraints severely limit options for cloud providers or international data transfers, making a flexible, global migration strategy challenging. The internal tech stack is unknown, meaning there is no evidence of cloud-native, containerized, or microservices architectures that would typically facilitate easier migration. Without this information, it must be assumed that migration could involve legacy systems, further increasing complexity. Financial stability, characterized by 100% revenue concentration in Denmark and a single product category, could also limit the financial resources available for a significant migration project. While the geographic diversity of vendor HQs (5 countries) for its 13 services might offer some flexibility in choosing alternative providers (assuming the 'Total Vendors: 0' data point is an error and the subsequent vendor geographic data is valid), the 'unknown' vendor lock-in risk and the ambiguous vendor count mean that potential dependencies and complexities related to existing vendor contracts cannot be fully assessed. Overall, the heavy regulatory and data residency burdens, coupled with a lack of clarity on internal architecture and financial concentration, point to a low readiness for significant digital migration.

Compliance

6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Danish Data Protection Act — Assessment Required

The Danish Data Protection Act (Act No. 502 of 23 May 2018, as amended) supplements GDPR with Denmark-specific provisions, including stricter rules on processing of CPR numbers (Danish civil registration numbers), employee data, and public authority data processing. As a Danish company, Engly Security is directly subject to this law. The risk is High because: (1) the Datatilsynet actively enforces both GDPR and the Danish Data Protection Act; (2) specific Danish rules on CPR number processing are frequently misunderstood and violated; (3) no compliance evidence was found publicly.

Evidence: https://engly.eu, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/502

EU Cybersecurity Act — Assessment Required

The EU Cybersecurity Act (Regulation (EU) 2019/881) established ENISA's permanent mandate and created the EU cybersecurity certification framework. For Engly Security as a cybersecurity service provider, this is relevant because: (1) EU cybersecurity certification schemes (e.g., EUCS for cloud services) may apply to services they recommend or use; (2) as a security consultancy, awareness of and alignment with ENISA frameworks is expected; (3) the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), currently being implemented, will impose requirements on products with digital elements. Risk is Medium as direct mandatory obligations are limited for pure advisory firms, but market and client expectations are rising.

Evidence: https://engly.eu, https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/cybersecurity-policy/certification, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/cybersecurity-act

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

GDPR is universally applicable to all EU/EEA-based companies that process personal data. Engly Security is headquartered in Denmark (EU member state) and, as a cybersecurity consultancy, almost certainly processes personal data of clients, employees, and suppliers. Non-compliance can result in fines of up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher. The Danish Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet) is an active enforcement body with a track record of issuing fines and reprimands. As a cybersecurity firm, Engly Security may also handle sensitive client data, elevating the risk profile. No public evidence of GDPR compliance documentation (e.g., privacy policy, DPO appointment, or audit) was found on their website, which is itself a potential compliance gap.

Evidence: https://engly.eu, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english, https://gdpr-info.eu/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 4/10

Engly Security is a Danish cybersecurity advisory boutique with no publicly retrievable financial data. The business model — advisory and consulting services — implies low fixed-asset intensity, minimal working capital requirements, and no inventory or hardware supply-chain exposure, which generally supports margin resilience. Additionally, the firm operates in a structurally growing market, with EU regulations such as NIS2 and DORA driving sustained demand for cybersecurity risk advisory in Denmark. However, the firm appears to be a micro-enterprise (likely 1–5 FTE) with significant key-person dependence on the founder/principal. Concentration risk is elevated given that boutique advisories typically rely on a small number of client relationships. The website shows dated content (references to older breaches and outdated industry statistics), suggesting limited marketing investment and possibly limited growth momentum. The firm competes in a crowded Danish market against much larger players including Dubex, Improsec, FortConsult (NCC Group), Deloitte, KPMG, PwC, and CSIS Security Group, with no visible differentiated IP. Absent CVR filings, no definitive resilience conclusion can be drawn, and the moderate score reflects this uncertainty combined with structural strengths and small-firm risks.

Key strengths: Low fixed-asset and working-capital intensity from advisory model, No hardware/software reseller exposure — margin resilience, Structural tailwind from NIS2 and DORA regulation in EU, Denmark-focused cybersecurity advisory market growth

Risk factors: Probable key-person dependence on founder/principal, Client concentration risk typical of boutique advisories, No visible differentiated IP in a crowded competitive field, Dated website content suggests limited marketing investment, Micro-enterprise scale (likely 1–5 FTE), No public financial disclosure retrievable

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report