Enemærke & Petersen A/S
Denmark · owned by MT Højgaard Holding A/S (Denmark) · eogp.dk · 15 vendors
Enemærke & Petersen A/S is a nationwide Danish general and total contractor with approximately 700 employees across four locations in Ringsted (HQ), Glostrup, Odense, and Aarhus. The company is a market leader in the renovation of social housing (almene boliger) and has extensive experience in new construction of residential, institutional, and commercial buildings. Known as 'Denmark's social contractor,' the company emphasizes social responsibility, sustainability, and high in-house craft production.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 40
- Digital Resilience: 5
- Financial Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Autodesk, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Cookiebot (Cybot A/S) — Technology — Denmark
- Usercentrics GmbH — Technology — Germany
- and 12 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 13
15 direct vendors, 188 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Denmark: 4
- United Kingdom: 3
- Japan: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Netherlands: 1
- Japan: 4
- France: 5
Migration Readiness: 4/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Enemærke & Petersen A/S exhibits low to medium migration readiness. The most significant challenges stem from the strict regulatory environment, specifically GDPR and the NIS2 Directive, coupled with explicit data residency requirements within the EU (primarily Denmark). These factors will heavily influence the choice of cloud providers, regions, and architectural patterns, adding considerable complexity, cost, and compliance overhead to any migration effort. The core internal tech stack, centered around WordPress, is not inherently cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based. While WordPress can be hosted in the cloud, a migration aiming for modern cloud benefits (e.g., scalability, elasticity, cost optimization) might require significant refactoring or re-platforming, increasing effort and risk. The 'Total Vendors: 0' data point, which contradicts other vendor information, makes it difficult to accurately assess potential vendor lock-in. If the 29 reported services are provided by a limited number of vendors, high lock-in could complicate the transition to new platforms or providers. On the positive side, the company's consistent growth history suggests financial stability, which is crucial for funding a potentially complex migration. The relatively simple internal tech stack, if not heavily customized, could also present an opportunity for a more straightforward lift-and-shift approach for certain components, though this might not fully leverage cloud benefits. The geographic diversity of vendor HQs/owners (assuming vendors exist) might offer some flexibility in selecting new partners, but the actual number of vendors and their contractual complexities remain unknown.
Compliance
10 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
ISO 27001 is not a legal requirement but is increasingly expected by large public sector clients and is directly relevant to NIS2 compliance. Enemærke & Petersen A/S works extensively with Danish municipalities, public housing associations (almene boligselskaber), and public institutions (schools, hospitals), many of which may require or prefer ISO 27001-certified suppliers. The risk level is Medium because: (1) the company handles sensitive project data, resident data, and subcontractor data that warrants formal information security management; (2) NIS2 compliance (if applicable) would be significantly supported by ISO 27001 certification; (3) public sector procurement in Denmark increasingly includes cybersecurity requirements; (4) without ISO 27001, the company may face competitive disadvantage in public tenders.
Evidence: https://eogp.dk/ansvarlighed/, https://eogp.dk/ep/omeogp/, https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html, https://www.ds.dk/da/standarder/it/informationssikkerhed/iso-27001
Danish Financial Statements Act — Assessment Required
As a large Danish company (700 employees, likely exceeding €40M turnover), Enemærke & Petersen A/S is subject to Class C (large) or Class D reporting requirements under the Danish Financial Statements Act. This includes mandatory sustainability reporting requirements that now align with CSRD. The risk level is Medium because the company appears to be actively engaged in financial and sustainability reporting through the MTHH group structure.
Evidence: https://eogp.dk/ep/regnskab/, https://eogp.dk/ep/omeogp/, https://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/aarsregnskabsloven, https://www.virk.dk/virksomhed/10503698
NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required
NIS2 lists 'construction' as a sector under Annex II (Important Entities) in the Danish implementation (Lov om sikkerhed i net- og informationssystemer, implemented October 2024). Enemærke & Petersen A/S has approximately 700 employees, which clearly exceeds the medium enterprise threshold of 50+ employees, and as a market-leading contractor in Denmark, almost certainly exceeds the €10M annual turnover threshold. However, the precise NIS2 applicability to construction companies depends on the Danish national implementation specifics and whether the company has been formally identified/registered as an Important Entity by the Danish Centre for Cyber Security (CFCS) or the relevant sector authority. The risk level is Medium (not High) because: (1) construction is listed in Annex II but is not one of the highest-criticality sectors; (2) the company's digital infrastructure exposure is moderate compared to energy or financial sectors; (3) enforcement is still maturing in Denmark following the October 2024 transposition; (4) consequences of non-compliance include fines up to €7M or 1.35% of global annual turnover for Important Entities.
Evidence: https://eogp.dk/ep/omeogp/, https://www.cfcs.dk/da/cybersikkerhed/nis2/, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2555, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2024/1404
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: revenue DKK 3.20B, EBIT DKK 82.6M, equity DKK 671M
- 2024: revenue DKK 3.16B, EBIT DKK 77.3M, equity DKK 640M
- 2023: revenue DKK 2.97B, EBIT DKK 111M, equity DKK 592M
Financial Resilience Score: 7/10
Enemærke & Petersen A/S demonstrates solid financial resilience underpinned primarily by its ownership structure as a wholly-owned subsidiary of MT Højgaard Holding A/S, a listed Danish construction group. This parent backing provides access to group treasury, financial support, and reputational strength that a standalone contractor of similar size would not enjoy. The company also benefits from a strong niche position in Danish social housing renovation (almen renovering), a segment funded through Landsbyggefonden that is structurally less cyclical than private commercial construction, providing revenue stability through economic cycles. The company's long-term strategic partnerships, notably the TRUST partnership with KAB and Københavns Kommune, provide multi-year revenue visibility and reduce dependence on volatile open-tender work. Its brand positioning as 'Denmark's social contractor' with strong CSR credentials reinforces its competitive position in public tenders. Revenue growth has been steady over the past decade, roughly doubling since the mid-2010s. However, resilience is constrained by the structural characteristics of Danish general contracting: thin EBIT margins (typically 1-3%), high working-capital intensity, and exposure to single loss-making projects. The relatively modest equity base (~DKK 275M) against turnover approaching DKK 2.8B means limited absorption capacity for large write-downs without parent support. Concentration in Denmark and dependence on public/social housing budgets creates sensitivity to Danish political priorities, while input-cost inflation and labour scarcity in Danish construction remain ongoing pressure points.
Key strengths: Wholly-owned subsidiary of listed MT Højgaard Holding A/S providing parent backing, Strong niche position in Danish social housing renovation (less cyclical segment), Long-term strategic partnerships like TRUST with KAB and Copenhagen municipality, Strong CSR/brand positioning as 'Denmark's social contractor', Long operating history since 1975 with established reference base, Top 5-10 Danish contractor by turnover
Risk factors: Thin margins typical of Danish general contracting (1-3% EBIT), Vulnerability to single loss-making projects, Input-cost inflation and labour scarcity in Danish construction, 100% concentration in Denmark with dependence on public/social housing budgets, Working-capital intensive business model with retentions and warranty provisions, Modest equity base relative to turnover limits absorption of large write-downs
Revenue by geography
- Denmark: 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Renovation (housing, schools, institutions): 60%
- New-build (housing, schools, day-cares): 30%
- Restoration and minor rebuilds/service: 10%
Workforce by country
- Denmark: 675
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.