Evanzo e-commerce GmbH

Germany · www.evanzo.de · 3 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 3 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-13 · revision 1

3 direct vendors, 64 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Evanzo e-commerce GmbH demonstrates a medium-low level of migration readiness. The internal tech stack is predominantly traditional, built around Linux, Windows Server, MySQL, Apache, and PHP 8, with no explicit mention of cloud-native architectures, containerization (e.g., Docker, Kubernetes), or microservices. This suggests a likely monolithic structure that would require substantial re-architecting for a modern cloud migration. The proprietary 'Evanzo Homepagebaukasten' also presents a potential challenge for migrating customer websites built on this platform. Critical information regarding the regulatory environment and data residency requirements is missing; however, as a German company, it is highly probable that GDPR compliance and specific data residency within Germany or the EU are mandatory, which would add complexity and limit choices for cloud providers. The lack of data on financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) makes it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a potentially costly and resource-intensive migration. While 'Total Vendors: 0' is listed, the presence of 5 services from vendors with HQ in the US and Germany, along with the explicit 1blu partnership, indicates existing vendor relationships. A potentially limited number of vendors, coupled with the specific partnership, could lead to vendor lock-in, increasing migration complexity and cost. The unknown nature of vendor lock-in risk further complicates readiness planning.

Compliance

10 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

EU Regulation 2021 — Partially Compliant

Evanzo has explicitly established a TCO contact point (tco-kontakt@evanzo.info) as required by Regulation (EU) 2021/784, which is a positive compliance indicator. The regulation applies to hosting service providers operating in the EU, requiring them to remove or disable access to terrorist content within one hour of receiving a removal order from a competent authority. Risk is Medium because: (1) the contact point is established (positive); (2) however, no public evidence of internal TCO compliance procedures, removal order handling processes, or transparency reporting has been found; (3) the regulation requires documented procedures for handling removal orders, which cannot be verified externally.

Evidence: https://www.evanzo.de/impressum, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R0784

EU Sanctions & Export Control Regulations — Partially Compliant

Risk is Low because: (1) Evanzo has published both a Sanctions & Trade Control Policy and an ABC (Anti-Bribery and Corruption) Policy, demonstrating formal compliance program elements; (2) as a hosting and domain services provider, Evanzo's exposure to sanctions risk relates primarily to ensuring it does not provide services to sanctioned entities or jurisdictions; (3) the existence of published policies is a positive indicator, but implementation effectiveness cannot be verified externally.

Evidence: https://www.evanzo.de/impressum, https://www.evanzo.de/downloads/Sanctions-Trade-Control-Policy.pdf, https://www.evanzo.de/downloads/ABC-Policy.pdf, https://www.evanzo.de/downloads/Code-of-Conduct.pdf

EU Whistleblower Protection Directive — Partially Compliant

Risk is Low because: (1) Evanzo has published a Whistleblower Policy on its website, demonstrating awareness of the obligation; (2) Germany transposed the EU Whistleblower Directive via the Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz (HinSchG), effective July 2023; (3) the policy's existence is a positive indicator, but the adequacy of the internal reporting channel and its compliance with HinSchG requirements (anonymous reporting, designated person/department, response timelines) cannot be verified from the public document alone.

Evidence: https://www.evanzo.de/impressum, https://www.evanzo.de/downloads/Whistleblower-Policy.pdf, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/hinschg/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Evanzo e-commerce GmbH is a small, privately held Berlin-based webhoster and domain registrar with an estimated two-decade operating history. As a 'kleine Kapitalgesellschaft' under §267 HGB, the company is not required to publish revenue or EBIT figures, so no quantitative financials could be retrieved from Bundesanzeiger or Northdata within this research session. Its subscription-based business model (domains, webhosting packages with 6-12 month contracts) provides predictable, recurring cash flow, and the affiliation with the larger, established 1blu AG likely provides shared infrastructure and operational scale that a standalone micro-hoster could not achieve. The company has demonstrated durability by surviving significant consolidation in the German hosting market (Host Europe, DomainFactory absorbed by GoDaddy). Its compliance posture—including Code of Conduct, ABC Policy, Sanctions & Trade Control Policy, and EU Regulation 2021/784 contact point—is unusually sophisticated for a micro-GmbH, suggesting operation within a larger corporate governance framework. However, intense price competition from IONOS, Strato, Hetzner, All-Inkl, and Netcup, combined with a seemingly legacy product portfolio and concentration on the German SMB/consumer market and .de TLD, constrains growth potential. Without disclosed financials, a definitive resilience rating cannot be confirmed, but qualitative indicators point to a stable, cash-flow-financed SMB.

Key strengths: Recurring subscription revenue model (6-12 month contracts), Long operating history (~two decades) with survival through market consolidation, Affiliation with larger partner 1blu AG providing infrastructure and scale, Low customer-acquisition friction with entry price points from €1.99/month, Sophisticated compliance framework (Code of Conduct, ABC, Sanctions, Whistleblower policies), Established brand in German hosting market

Risk factors: Intense price competition from IONOS, Strato, Hetzner, All-Inkl, Netcup, DomainFactory, Legacy product portfolio with limited investment in modern cloud/Kubernetes offerings, Concentration on German SMB/consumer market and .de TLD, Small-company disclosure limits transparency for counterparties and lenders, Dependence on partner 1blu for vServer/VPS product line, Rising regulatory compliance burden (NIS-2, DSA, EU 2021/784, GDPR) disproportionately expensive for small hosters

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report