Forescout
United States · www.forescout.com · 27 vendors
Forescout Technologies, Inc. is a global cybersecurity leader that helps organizations identify, protect, and manage risk across all managed and unmanaged cyber assets, including IT, OT, IoT, and IoMT. The company provides agentless visibility and control of devices the instant they connect to the network, enabling continuous risk assessment and dynamic control across the attack surface.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 93
- Digital Resilience: 8
- Financial Resilience: 4
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Demandware — Technology — United States
- Meta Platforms, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 24 more
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 27 sub-vendors.
- Device visibility
Insights
Last updated 2026-03-06 · revision 4
27 direct vendors, 297 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 25
- Australia: 1
- Bulgaria: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Norway: 2
- United Kingdom: 8
- Australia: 2
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Forescout exhibits high migration readiness primarily due to its highly modern and cloud-native internal tech stack. The extensive use of Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Kubernetes, and Docker indicates a strong foundation in containerization and potentially microservices architecture, which are key enablers for flexible and efficient migrations. The reliance on Python, Java, and REST APIs further supports a modular and interoperable environment. The use of both AWS and Azure suggests familiarity with multi-cloud environments, reducing potential lock-in to a single cloud provider for core infrastructure. However, significant unknowns exist regarding the regulatory environment and specific data residency requirements, which could introduce complexities and constraints during a migration. Financial stability data, crucial for funding large-scale migrations, is also not provided. The 'Vendor Relationships' section states 'Total Vendors: 0', which is inconsistent with the 'Internal Tech Stack' that clearly indicates reliance on multiple major third-party services. Assuming these services represent their actual vendor landscape, Forescout leverages a diverse set of SaaS and cloud infrastructure providers. While specific vendor lock-in risk is noted as 'Unknown', the use of various SaaS platforms (Salesforce, Marketo, Zendesk) means these functions are already cloud-based, simplifying their 'migration' in a broader sense, though specific contract complexities are not detailed.
Compliance
5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
GDPR (source) — Assessment Required
High risk due to significant EU operations (France, Germany, Italy, Spain regional sites) and processing of personal data from EU residents through their cybersecurity services, customer portals, and employee data. GDPR fines can reach 4% of annual turnover or €20M. As a technology company serving Fortune 500 clients, non-compliance could result in substantial penalties and reputational damage.
Evidence: https://www.forescout.com/privacy-policy/, https://www.forescout.com/company/legal/
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
High risk as ISO 27001 is essential for cybersecurity companies to demonstrate information security management. Given Forescout's role in protecting critical infrastructure and Fortune 500 companies, ISO 27001 certification is typically required by enterprise customers and for competitive positioning.
NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required
Medium risk as Forescout operates in EU and provides cybersecurity services to critical infrastructure sectors (energy, financial, healthcare, manufacturing). While they may qualify as a digital service provider under NIS2, their exact classification and size thresholds in EU need verification. Non-compliance could result in fines up to €10M or 2% of annual turnover.
Evidence: https://www.forescout.com/solutions/power-utilities/, https://www.forescout.com/solutions/financial-services/
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2019: revenue $333.6M, EBIT -$109.8M, equity $102.7M
- 2018: revenue $309.4M, EBIT -$84.3M, equity $177.0M
- 2017: revenue $249.2M, EBIT -$65.7M, equity $109.0M
Financial Resilience Score: 4/10
Based on its last publicly available financial data (FY2019), Forescout exhibited several indicators of low to moderate financial resilience: * Persistent Operating Losses: A primary concern was the company's inability to achieve profitability. Forescout consistently reported significant and increasing operating losses, indicating that its core business operations were not self-sustaining. This reliance on external funding (debt or equity) to cover operational shortfalls is a key vulnerability. * Decelerating Revenue Growth: While revenue was growing, the significant slowdown in growth from over 24% in FY2018 to under 8% in FY2019 raised questions about its future top-line expansion capabilities, especially in the context of increasing losses. * Eroding Equity: The substantial decline in total equity in FY2019 signaled that accumulated losses were eroding the company's capital base, which can limit its ability to absorb future shocks or fund strategic initiatives without further dilution or debt. * Cash Flow Concerns (Inferred): Companies with persistent and growing operating losses typically experience negative operating cash flow, requiring them to burn through cash reserves or seek additional financing. This limits financial flexibility and increases risk. The acquisition by Advent International can be seen as a response to these financial pressures, allowing the company to restructure and focus on long-term profitability away from the quarterly scrutiny of public markets. Its resilience under private ownership is not publicly ascertainable but would depend heavily on the strategic and operational changes implemented by Advent.
Risk factors: Persistent Operating Losses, Decelerating Revenue Growth, Eroding Equity, Cash Flow Concerns (Inferred)
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.