Geohosting

Denmark · www.geohosting.dk · 4 vendors

AttractSoft GmbH is a German web technologies company that invents, develops, and operates web 2.0 services. They provide a range of services including web hosting solutions, web development, IT infrastructure management, and cybersecurity services. The company is associated with the GEO HOSTING brand, providing services through domains like geohosting.dk.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 4 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-02 · revision 18

4 direct vendors, 128 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Geohosting's migration readiness is assessed as medium, primarily due to a complex regulatory landscape and strict data residency requirements. The 'Assessment Required' status for GDPR, NIS2, SOC2, and ISO 27001 indicates that any migration effort would need to meticulously address these compliance frameworks, potentially increasing complexity and cost. Furthermore, as a Danish company operating in the EU/EEA, Geohosting is subject to GDPR data residency requirements, with transfers outside the EU/EEA needing adequate safeguards. Potential specific Danish public sector requirements could further mandate data to remain within the EU/EEA or Denmark, significantly limiting choices for cloud providers or migration targets. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown, which could present a significant challenge if there are high dependencies on existing vendors for the 5 services identified. There is no available data on Geohosting's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native vs. legacy, containerization), which prevents an assessment of technical readiness for migration. Similarly, financial stability data is missing, making it impossible to gauge the company's ability to fund a substantial migration effort.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applicability depends on Geohosting's specific technology services and company size. If they provide digital services, cloud computing, or ICT services and meet the size threshold (50+ employees or €10M+ turnover), they would be classified as Important Entities under NIS2. The risk is medium because while penalties exist, they are generally less severe than GDPR, but cybersecurity incidents could have significant business impact.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is voluntary but highly recommended for technology companies handling sensitive data. While not legally required, it demonstrates security maturity and is often required by enterprise customers. The risk is medium as it impacts business credibility and customer acquisition rather than legal compliance.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is voluntary but increasingly expected for technology service providers, especially those serving business customers or handling sensitive data. While not legally required, lack of SOC2 certification can impact business opportunities and customer trust. The risk is medium as it affects competitiveness rather than legal compliance.

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report