Geopartner Landinspektører A/S

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · geopartner.dk · 25 vendors

Geopartner Landinspektører A/S is one of Denmark's largest consulting land surveying companies. They offer expert advice and services to businesses, public authorities, and private citizens nationwide. Their core services encompass cadastral work, technical surveying, property development, planning, GIS, and geodata management.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 25 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 5

25 direct vendors, 291 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Geopartner Landinspektører A/S exhibits medium migration readiness, leaning towards the lower end. A primary challenge stems from its core internal tech stack, specifically the 'internally developed/hosted WebGIS' and 'LER 2.0 digital infrastructure.' These systems likely represent custom-built, potentially monolithic, and on-premise architectures, which are inherently more complex and costly to migrate to modern cloud-native, containerized, or microservices environments compared to off-the-shelf or already cloud-optimized solutions. While 'Data Residency Requirements' are not explicitly specified, given the company's exclusive operations in Denmark and its focus on Danish infrastructure and LER 2.0 compliance, it is highly probable that strict data residency requirements for core operational data exist within Denmark. This would limit flexibility in choosing cloud providers and regions, potentially increasing migration complexity and cost. The 'Regulatory Environment' is also not detailed, but LER 2.0 compliance suggests a need for careful consideration of data handling during any migration. The company's strong financial stability, evidenced by consistent revenue growth, is a significant advantage as it provides the necessary capital to fund a complex migration effort. However, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' for its 67 services is 'Unknown.' The sheer number of services suggests a broad set of dependencies, and without understanding the nature of these vendor relationships (e.g., contract terms, integration depth), assessing the ease of migrating away from or re-integrating these services is difficult. High vendor lock-in for critical services could significantly impede migration. The geographic diversity of vendor HQs/owners (8-9 countries) could also add complexity to contract renegotiations or technical integrations during a migration.

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a Danish company with 230+ employees operating across Denmark, Geopartner processes significant amounts of personal data including employee data, customer data, and potentially property owner data through their surveying services. GDPR non-compliance can result in fines up to 4% of annual turnover or €20 million. The company has a privacy policy and uses ComplyCloud for compliance management, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements, but detailed compliance status requires assessment.

Evidence: https://geopartner.dk/persondatapolitik/, https://geopartner.dk/cookieindstillinger-og-deklaration/

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

While not mandatory, SOC2 may be relevant if Geopartner provides cloud-based GIS services or handles sensitive client data electronically. The company offers GIS & geodata services and likely uses digital platforms for data processing and client service delivery. Risk is medium as it's primarily a business requirement rather than regulatory mandate.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

As a company handling sensitive geospatial data, property information, and client data across 25 offices, information security management is critical. ISO 27001 certification would demonstrate systematic approach to information security. Risk is medium as it's a best practice standard that enhances client trust and competitive positioning.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 9/10

Geopartner Landinspektører A/S demonstrates strong financial resilience based on the provided data: Consistent Revenue Growth: The company has shown robust year-over-year revenue growth, indicating a healthy demand for its services and effective market penetration. A consistent growth rate above 9% for the past two years is a positive sign. Strong Profitability: EBIT has grown even faster than revenue, suggesting improved operational efficiency and/or pricing power. The EBIT margin (EBIT/Revenue) has been consistently strong and improving: FY 2022: 9.67% FY 2021: 9.14% FY 2020: 8.31% This upward trend in profitability margins indicates effective cost management and a healthy core business. Robust Equity Position: The equity base has grown significantly year-over-year, increasing by over 22% in both periods. This substantial growth in equity strengthens the company's balance sheet, provides a buffer against potential losses, and indicates strong retained earnings. A growing equity base is crucial for long-term stability and funding future growth without excessive reliance on debt. Positive Trend: All key financial metrics (Revenue, EBIT, Equity) show a clear positive trend over the three-year period, reflecting a well-managed and growing business. The company appears to be in a very solid financial position, capable of absorbing potential economic shocks and funding its strategic initiatives.

Key strengths: Consistent Revenue Growth, Strong Profitability, Robust Equity Position, Positive Trend

Revenue by geography

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report