Gfluo Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Gfluo: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

France · gfluo.com · 10 vendors

gFLUO provides a Webflow app that enables users to apply GSAP animations to their websites quickly and without writing code. It offers a library of custom, attribute-based animations for various elements, allowing for fast animation implementation.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 10 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-23 · revision 5

10 direct vendors, 114 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://www.gfluo.com/privacy-policy, https://tonik.com

SOC 2 (source) — No public evidence

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 3/10

gFLUO is an extremely early-stage micro-SaaS product operated as a sub-brand within Tonik, a small design studio based in Poznań, Poland. Estimated annual recurring revenue (ARR) is in the range of $5,000–$30,000 USD, well below any meaningful financial reporting threshold. The product has only approximately 12–18 months of operating history as of mid-2025, with a user base of roughly 80–140 installs on the Webflow Marketplace. There are no public financial filings, no disclosed investors, and no formal corporate structure separate from the parent studio, making independent financial assessment impossible without direct access to internal data. On the positive side, the business model is capital-light with near-zero marginal cost per additional customer, and the recurring subscription structure (monthly and annual plans) provides some revenue predictability. The parent studio Tonik has an established client portfolio including YCombinator-backed startups and notable names such as Supabase and LangChain, offering operational and reputational support. Webflow's official endorsement and marketplace listing provide organic distribution without heavy marketing spend. However, the risks are substantial. The product is almost entirely dependent on the Webflow ecosystem for distribution, creating extreme platform concentration risk. The user base is tiny, key-person risk is high (apparently operated by 1–2 individuals), and there is no disclosed external funding. The freemium model introduces conversion uncertainty, and the competitive moat is weak given that Webflow or other developers could replicate core functionality. The unresolved ambiguity around the legal/corporate structure (France vs. Poland) adds further regulatory and contractual uncertainty. Overall, gFLUO's financial resilience is very low as a standalone entity. Its survival is contingent on Tonik's broader business health and the continued growth and openness of the Webflow platform. Any adverse change in either could be existential for the product.

Key strengths: Capital-light SaaS model with near-zero marginal cost per additional user, Recurring revenue via monthly ($29/mo) and annual ($299/yr) subscription tiers, Lifetime access tier ($499) provides upfront capital injection, Backed operationally by Tonik, an established design studio with 200+ clients, Official Webflow App Marketplace listing providing organic discovery, Webflow 'Approved by Webflow' endorsement lending credibility, Webflow's official Twitter/X account promoted gFLUO in August 2024, Niche product-market fit targeting underserved no-code GSAP animation use case

Risk factors: Extremely small scale: ~80–140 installs and estimated ARR of only $5,000–$30,000 USD, 100% platform dependency on Webflow Marketplace for distribution, No competitive moat; core functionality could be replicated by Webflow or competitors, Key-person risk: product appears operated by a single individual (Wojtek W.) within a small studio, No disclosed external funding; product is likely fully bootstrapped, Freemium tier creates conversion uncertainty with unknown paid conversion rates, Unclear legal/corporate structure: stated France HQ conflicts with Poland-based operator evidence, No public financial filings, statutory accounts, or trade register entries found, Only 12–18 months of operating history as of mid-2025, Revenue likely insufficient to sustain a dedicated independent team

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report