Gigahost

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · www.gigahost.dk · 10 vendors

Gigahost is a Danish web hosting company that offers domain registration and quality web hosting services with unlimited domains, email addresses, databases, and traffic on a single account. Founded in 2005 and headquartered at Gammeltorv 8 in Copenhagen, it positions itself as the only web host in Denmark offering truly unlimited hosting resources. It supports all major CMS platforms including WordPress, Joomla, and Drupal, with servers located in Copenhagen on a 10 Gbit connection.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Gigahost has an estimated 27% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 10 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

10 direct vendors, 80 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Gigahost demonstrates high migration readiness, scoring 85. A key enabler is the use of 'Containerized Execution Environments', which makes applications highly portable and adaptable for cloud platforms. The core 'Internal Tech Stack' (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) is widely supported across major cloud providers. The most significant advantage for migration is the 'Total Vendors: 0', which, if taken literally, means there is no vendor lock-in, dramatically simplifying the migration process by removing complex vendor contract negotiations or technology dependencies. The company is 'GDPR Compliant', and the 'EU Data Residency' requirement is a clear, known constraint, which, while limiting global cloud region choices, simplifies compliance planning for an EU-based cloud migration. 'Stable growth over the past decade' suggests the financial capacity to fund a migration initiative. While the architecture is containerized, it is not explicitly described as microservices, presenting an opportunity for further architectural modernization during or after a cloud migration. The lack of specific financial details (e.g., current infrastructure costs) prevents a precise cost-benefit analysis for migration.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Danish Data Protection Act — Compliant

The Danish Data Protection Act (Act No. 502 of 23 May 2018, as amended) supplements GDPR with national specifications applicable to all data controllers and processors operating in Denmark. Gigahost explicitly references compliance with both GDPR and the Danish Data Protection Act in its Terms of Service. Risk is Medium for the same reasons as GDPR — self-declaration without independent audit, and the inherent complexity of acting as both a data controller (for customer accounts) and a data processor (for customer-hosted content).

Evidence: https://www.gigahost.dk/tos, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/502

EU Digital Services Act — Assessment Required

The DSA applies to all digital intermediary services offered to recipients in the EU, including hosting service providers. Gigahost, as a web hosting provider, falls within the DSA's scope as a 'hosting service'. Basic DSA obligations for hosting providers include: implementing notice-and-takedown mechanisms for illegal content, publishing transparency reports, and cooperating with authorities. Risk is Medium because: (1) DSA is actively enforced by the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) as the Digital Services Coordinator for Denmark; (2) Gigahost serves customers across multiple EU and non-EU markets; (3) non-compliance with DSA obligations (particularly notice-and-takedown) can result in significant fines (up to 6% of global annual turnover).

Evidence: https://www.gigahost.dk/about, https://www.gigahost.dk/tos, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065, https://www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/digital-services-act

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

Gigahost is a cloud/web hosting service provider — precisely the type of organisation for which SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) is designed. As a hosting provider, Gigahost's customers may require SOC 2 assurance as part of their own vendor due diligence or compliance programmes. The absence of any publicly disclosed SOC 2 report is notable for a hosting provider and may represent a competitive and compliance gap, particularly for enterprise or regulated-industry customers. Risk is Medium because: (1) SOC 2 is not legally mandated in Denmark/EU but is increasingly expected by enterprise customers; (2) absence of SOC 2 may limit Gigahost's ability to serve regulated industries; (3) the company's self-declaration of data protection practices (in ToS) is not equivalent to a SOC 2 audit.

Evidence: https://www.gigahost.dk/features, https://www.gigahost.dk/tos, https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/system-and-organization-controls-soc-suite-of-services

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Gigahost is a small, long-established Danish web hosting company (founded 2006, CVR 31154715) that appears financially resilient based on qualitative factors, though specific financial figures are not publicly disclosed due to Danish class-B reporting exemptions for small ApS entities. The company benefits from a recurring subscription revenue model (DKK 29/month hosting plans), long operating history of nearly 20 years, and an asset-light, scalable infrastructure operated from a single Copenhagen datacenter. These characteristics typically support predictable cash flows and high customer stickiness through domain lock-in and email migration friction. However, the company operates at small scale in a commoditized market with significant competitive pressure from larger Danish/Nordic incumbents (One.com, Simply.com, Curanet, DanDomain, GratisDNS) and global hyperscalers (Hostinger, SiteGround, Kinsta, WP Engine). The single-datacenter, single-country infrastructure limits geographic redundancy, and typical key-person/owner-managed risks apply. Without access to the actual årsrapport figures for bruttofortjeneste, EBIT, equity, and balance sheet totals, a definitive resilience score cannot be established, but the qualitative profile suggests moderate resilience typical of a stable niche player.

Key strengths: Long operating history since 2006 (~20 years), Recurring subscription revenue model with high customer stickiness, Asset-light and scalable single-platform infrastructure, No venture debt exposure typical of small Danish ApS, Multilingual expansion across 7 languages suggesting geographic diversification, Established brand with low customer acquisition costs

Risk factors: Small scale competing with larger Danish/Nordic incumbents and global hyperscalers, Commoditization and price pressure in shared hosting market, Single-datacenter/single-country infrastructure in Copenhagen with limited geographic redundancy, Key-person/owner-managed risk typical of small ApS, Cybersecurity, DDoS, malware, and GDPR liability exposure, Margin pressure from unlimited-resources pricing at DKK 29/month

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report