Give Steel A/S Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Give Steel A/S: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by FOX HOLDING ApS (Denmark) · givesteel.dk · 7 vendors

Give Steel A/S is a leading manufacturer of steel structures and one of Denmark's largest material suppliers, producing steel trusses, lattice girders, and the proprietary GSY® composite beam system. All steel structures are manufactured in Denmark and delivered to contractors and building owners across Northern Europe, including Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, and Poland. The company employs over 600 people across four locations in Denmark, Germany, and Poland, and holds certifications including EN 1090 EXC4, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-09 · revision 3

7 direct vendors, 120 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Give Steel A/S exhibits a medium level of migration readiness, with several significant challenges and opportunities. The internal tech stack, while modern for manufacturing operations (BIM, robotics), does not explicitly mention cloud-native architectures, containerization, or microservices. The website runs on WordPress, which, while adaptable, is not inherently cloud-native in its default setup. This suggests that core systems may be more traditional or on-premise, potentially requiring a complex lift-and-shift or re-platforming effort rather than a straightforward cloud migration. A major challenge is the 'Medium' vendor lock-in risk, which indicates that disentangling from existing vendor relationships or renegotiating contracts could be complex and costly during a migration. The regulatory environment also poses a significant hurdle: the company's potential classification as an 'Important entity' under NIS2 in Denmark means that if NIS2 applies (contingent on company size), any migration would need to rigorously address stringent cybersecurity, supply chain security, and data protection requirements, adding complexity and cost. The absence of specified data residency requirements is another critical unknown; if strict rules apply, they could heavily influence cloud provider selection and architecture design. Furthermore, the lack of financial data (revenue concentration, growth history) makes it impossible to assess the company's financial capacity to fund a potentially large-scale migration project. While the company's adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies suggests an openness to innovation, the specific challenges related to vendor lock-in, regulatory compliance, and the likely traditional nature of core IT systems place its migration readiness in the mid-range, leaning towards the lower end due to the critical unknowns.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

IED — No public evidence

The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) applies to industrial activities with a high pollution potential. Steel manufacturing can involve processes that are covered by the directive, depending on the specific activities and production thresholds.

Evidence: https://givesteel.com/en/quality/, https://oekobaudat.de/OEKOBAU.DAT/resource/sources/3dd7e1c4-e13f-44e6-81a2-26ff5d2f30e7/Galvanized_Structural_Steel_16708.pdf?version=00.01.000, https://sustainablefutures.linklaters.com/post/102nrfm/esg-quick-guide-eu-industrial-emissions-directive-ied, https://www.era-comm.eu/IED/module_1/scope.html, https://www.gasmet.com/blog/what-does-the-new-ied-mean-for-air-emissions-from-large-industrial-operations/, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2024/759613/EPRS_ATA(2024)759613_EN.pdf

Danish Working Environment Act — No public evidence

As a company with production facilities and employees in Denmark, Give Steel A/S is subject to the Danish Working Environment Act, which governs occupational health and safety.

Evidence: https://givesteel.com/en/steel-structures/, https://givesteel.com/en/, https://givesteel.com/en/about/history/, https://givesteel.com/wp-content/uploads/Give-Steel-Profile-Brochure.pdf, https://givesteel.com/en/about/owners/, https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dd5l8iA19BDc&q=EhAqBdAUBhsnCFwN1OK1Zh1JGKf9o9YGIjAf8kptbYjPjjv1dUao4W8bgLi2RsiAGOTxpkcUuVnhG_k_2fKV8VoBy58meEpRExUyAnJSWgFD

REACH — No public evidence

The REACH regulation applies to the manufacturing, import, and use of chemical substances. Steel production involves the use of various alloys and potentially other chemicals that may be subject to REACH.

Evidence: https://www.mdmetals.com/2025/05/17/rohs-and-reach-compliance-for-processed-steel-materials-essential-information-for-oems-and-engineers/, https://www.ausasteel.com/en/discover-what-reach-is-and-how-it-applies-en-steel/, https://www.aerometalsalliance.com/resources/data-sheets/view/All-Metals-REACH-Stainless-Steel_302, https://www.valbruna-stainless-steel.com/environment/reach, https://givesteel.com/en/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Give Steel A/S demonstrates strong and improving financial resilience despite a declining revenue trajectory. The company has executed a successful strategic pivot from low-margin volume work to higher-value projects (particularly datacentres), evidenced by EBIT more than doubling in FY2025 (+103%) despite revenue falling 15.4%. EBIT margin jumped from ~4.4% in FY2024 to ~10.5% in FY2025, and net profit rose +137%. Equity has grown 2.3x in three years from DKK 88m (2022) to DKK 200m (2025), almost entirely from retained earnings, pushing the equity ratio (soliditet) to 29% from 22.2% - rated 'God' (good). Liquidity is satisfactory with a current ratio of 146% in 2025 (up from 120% in 2024), and return on assets improved to 8.6% from 3.9%. The company benefits from technical entry barriers including EN 1090 EXC4, ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and EN ISO 3834 certifications - the EXC4 execution class being required for complex load-bearing projects like datacentres. Diversified Nordic/European sales reach spans 10+ countries. However, three consecutive years of declining revenue (DKK 1.18B → 0.85B) raise concerns about re-establishing growth. Headcount reduction from 516 to 430 (-17%) signals capacity right-sizing. Leverage is moderate with liabilities of DKK 439m against equity of DKK 200m, and the company remains cyclically exposed to Northern European non-residential construction, currently in a weak phase.

Key strengths: EBIT margin doubled from 4.4% to 10.5% in FY2025, Equity grew 2.3x in three years, almost entirely from retained earnings, Equity ratio improved to 29%, rated 'good', Current ratio of 146% indicates satisfactory liquidity, EN 1090 EXC4 certification creates entry barriers for datacentre projects, Diversified Nordic/European geographic reach across 10+ countries, Strategic pivot to high-value datacentre segment, Return on assets improved to 8.6% from 3.9%

Risk factors: Three consecutive years of declining revenue (DKK 1.18B to DKK 0.85B), Headcount reduction of 17% in 2025 signals capacity cuts, Cyclical exposure to Northern European non-residential construction, Moderate leverage with DKK 439m liabilities vs DKK 200m equity, Private ownership with limited transparency on customer concentration, No geographic revenue split disclosed

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report