GleSYS AB
Sweden · owned by Independent (Sweden) · www.glesys.com · 14 vendors
Glesys is a Swedish cloud infrastructure and hosting provider founded in 1999, offering hybrid IT solutions including virtual servers (KVM/VMware), dedicated servers, colocation, managed services, and connectivity across Nordic and European data centers. The company focuses on performance, data sovereignty, GDPR compliance, and sustainability, powering all operations with renewable energy. It serves developers and businesses across the Nordics and beyond with private and public cloud, storage, and network services.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 29
- Digital Resilience: 8
- Financial Resilience: 6
Disruption prediction
GleSYS AB has an estimated 27% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
8 of GleSYS AB's 14 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Meta Platforms, Inc. — Technology — United States
- The Apache Software Foundation — Technology — United States
- Veeam Software Group GmbH — Technology — United States
- and 12 more
Services catalogue
4 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 14 sub-vendors.
- Web Hosting / Infrastructure as a Service
- Email Hosting
- DNS
Insights
Last updated 2026-05-03 · revision 3
14 direct vendors, 222 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Sweden: 2
- Denmark: 1
- United States: 9
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 4
- United States: 160
- Israel: 2
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
GleSYS exhibits high migration readiness, scoring 88, primarily due to its modern and flexible technology stack and strong compliance focus. The company's internal tech stack includes Infrastructure as Code (Terraform), containerization (Docker), GraphQL, and a full-featured RESTful API, enabling programmatic management of all infrastructure resources. This indicates a highly automated and agile environment, crucial for efficient migrations. GleSYS also offers managed services (Managed Database, Managed Linux/Windows Hosting) and 'Professional Services' for migration assistance, demonstrating capabilities to support complex transitions. The strong emphasis on 'GDPR-compliant Cloud Infrastructure,' 'ISO/IEC 27001 Security Framework,' and 'Data Sovereignty / EU Access Policy' within its European operational footprint simplifies compliance for migrations, especially for businesses with EU data residency requirements. While specific data residency options are not explicitly detailed, their EU-centric operations and policies strongly imply adherence. The ambiguity of 'Total Vendors: 0' makes it difficult to assess external vendor lock-in for GleSYS itself; however, the breadth of their own offerings and their API-first approach suggest a high degree of internal flexibility and minimal reliance on proprietary external systems that could hinder migration. The absence of financial stability data is a minor limitation, but the technical and operational strengths overwhelmingly point to high migration readiness.
Compliance
5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required
As a cloud services provider, SOC2 compliance would be highly valuable for customer trust and competitive positioning. Many enterprise customers require SOC2 reports from cloud providers. Without SOC2 compliance, they may face customer acquisition challenges and competitive disadvantages in the enterprise market.
ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required
ISAE 3000 is primarily relevant for assurance service providers. As a cloud infrastructure provider, GleSYS may not require ISAE 3000 unless they provide specific assurance services. The risk is low as this framework is not typically mandatory for their business model.
NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required
GleSYS operates as a digital infrastructure provider offering cloud services, data center services, and managed IT services in the EU. They likely qualify as an 'Important Entity' under NIS2 as a digital service provider. However, without confirmed employee count or revenue figures, size threshold compliance cannot be definitively determined. Non-compliance could result in significant fines up to €10M or 2% of global turnover.
Evidence: https://www.glesys.com
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024:
- 2023:
- 2022:
Financial Resilience Score: 6/10
GleSYS AB demonstrates a structurally sound business model anchored in recurring IaaS and managed services revenue, which provides strong revenue predictability and low churn risk. The company's vertical integration — owning its own data centers in Sweden (Falkenberg, Stockholm) and Finland (Oulu, Pori, Tampere) as well as its own fiber network — reduces third-party dependency and supports long-term margin control, a meaningful differentiator versus asset-light competitors. The company's operational efficiency metrics are notably strong: a PUE of 1.28 versus the global average of ~1.57, WUE of 0.05, 100% renewable electricity, and 84% waste heat reuse via district heating. These metrics reduce energy cost exposure and enhance competitiveness on sustainability grounds, which is increasingly important for European enterprise procurement. ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO/IEC 27001 certifications further reinforce its enterprise credibility and create switching-cost moats. However, the score is tempered by significant capital expenditure intensity inherent in owning and expanding multi-country data center infrastructure, which can pressure cash flow during growth phases. The recent full integration of Finnish operations (completed early 2025) introduces post-acquisition execution risk. Additionally, competition from hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP) with vastly greater resources constrains addressable market, and the company's geographic concentration in Sweden and Finland creates regional risk exposure. Financial transparency is very low given private company status and inaccessible filings, making it impossible to verify leverage, liquidity, or profitability from public sources. The resilience score of 6 reflects a qualitatively strong and differentiated business model offset by capex intensity, integration risk, and the inherent opacity of a privately held company with no public financial disclosure.
Key strengths: Recurring IaaS and managed services revenue model providing high revenue predictability, Vertically integrated infrastructure (owned data centers and fiber network in Sweden and Finland), Strong operational efficiency: PUE 1.28, WUE 0.05, 100% renewable electricity, 84% waste heat reuse, ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certifications and GDPR/EU Access Policy compliance, Enterprise reference customers including Tietoevry, Consid, and Vitec, Active Nordic geographic expansion with completed Finnish integration (Pori, Tampere, Oulu), Positioning in GPU/AI infrastructure segment for emerging workload demand, Founded 2002 — over 20 years of operating history indicating business durability
Risk factors: High capital expenditure intensity from owning and expanding multi-country data center infrastructure, Competition from hyperscalers (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud) with vastly greater resources, Post-acquisition integration execution risk from recent full absorption of Finnish cloud operations, Geographic concentration of owned infrastructure in Sweden and Finland, Very low financial transparency — private company with no accessible public financial filings, Competitive Nordic tech labor market creating talent retention cost and operational risk
Revenue by geography
- Sweden: 0%
- Finland: 0%
- Rest of Europe: 0%
Revenue by product/service
- Colocation: 0%
- Managed Services: 0%
- Connectivity/Networking: 0%
- Cloud Compute (VPS/VMware): 0%
- Bare Metal/Dedicated Servers: 0%
Workforce by country
- Sweden: 0
- Finland: 0
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.