GlobalSign nv-sa
Belgium · owned by GMO Internet Group, Inc. (Japan) · www.globalsign.com · 46 vendors
GlobalSign is a WebTrust-certified certificate authority and provider of identity services. The company also sells and manages SSL certificates.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 2
- Digital Resilience: 7
- Financial Resilience: 8
Disruption prediction
GlobalSign nv-sa has an estimated 11% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
20 of GlobalSign nv-sa's 46 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Anthropic, PBC — Technology — United States
- Cookiebot (Cybot A/S) — Technology — Denmark
- and 44 more
Services catalogue
7 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 46 sub-vendors.
- SSL/TLS Certificate Services
- GlobalSign SSL Certificates
- SSL/TLS Certificates
Insights
Last updated 2026-06-10 · revision 2
46 direct vendors, 409 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- UK: 1
- Czech Republic: 1
- India: 2
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Israel: 3
- Germany: 13
- Netherlands: 6
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
GlobalSign exhibits a high level of migration readiness, scoring 85. This is primarily driven by its highly modern and cloud-native oriented tech stack, which includes Kubernetes, ACME Protocol, REST APIs, OAuth 2.0, CI/CD pipeline integration, and Post-Quantum Computing (PQC) readiness. A significant portion of its product portfolio, such as Atlas, Managed PKI, ACME, Edge Enroll, and Digital Signing Service, are already cloud-based or SaaS solutions, demonstrating extensive existing cloud adoption and expertise. The company's consistent revenue growth provides a strong financial foundation to fund future migration initiatives. While operating in a stringent regulatory environment, GlobalSign's existing robust compliance framework (ISO, eIDAS, GDPR, NIS2) means it has established processes and documentation that can be adapted to new environments, facilitating compliance during migration. The company utilizes 65 services from vendors across 11 unique countries, indicating a diverse vendor landscape that generally minimizes vendor lock-in and offers flexibility when considering new platforms or providers. However, the assessment notes a contradiction in the provided data regarding vendors, stating "Total Vendors: 0" while also detailing vendor services and geographic diversity; this assessment assumes the detailed vendor service data is relevant for diversity. Minor challenges include the presence of an on-premise platform ("Certificate Automation Manager") which may require more effort to migrate, and the lack of publicly detailed specific data residency options, which could introduce complexity if strict customer requirements need to be met in new cloud environments. The "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is stated as "Unknown," though the observed vendor diversity mitigates this concern.
Compliance
7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
eIDAS — Compliant
GlobalSign demonstrates eIDAS compliance through Ernst & Young CertifyPoint certification and offers eIDAS-compliant electronic signature services. As an EU-based trust service provider, eIDAS compliance is mandatory and well-established.
Evidence: https://www.globalsign.com/en/repository/eidas.pdf, https://shop.globalsign.com/en/eidas-electronic-signatures
GDPR (source) — Compliant
GlobalSign demonstrates strong GDPR compliance with comprehensive privacy policies, appointed Data Protection Officers across regions, clear data subject rights procedures, and explicit consent mechanisms. As an EU-headquartered company (Belgium) processing personal data globally, GDPR compliance is mandatory and well-established. The company has implemented Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) and shows evidence of mature data protection practices.
Evidence: https://www.globalsign.com/en/repository/GlobalSign-Privacy-Policy.pdf, https://www.globalsign.com/en/data-request-form, https://preferences.globalsign.com/PreferencesCenter/
PSD2 — Compliant
GlobalSign offers PSD2-specific digital certificates and demonstrates understanding of Payment Services Directive requirements. As a certificate provider serving financial services, they maintain appropriate compliance for this sector.
Evidence: https://www.globalsign.com/en/payment-services-directive-psd2, https://shop.globalsign.com/en/psd2-digital-certificates
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024:
- 2023:
- 2022:
Financial Resilience Score: 8/10
GlobalSign nv-sa demonstrates strong financial resilience primarily through its ownership by GMO Internet Group, a profitable, multi-billion-USD revenue listed Japanese internet conglomerate (TSE: 9449). This parent backing provides capital access, group-shared infrastructure, and stability through economic cycles. The business model is built on recurring revenue from certificates, managed PKI, and signing services, which are largely subscription-based and renewal-heavy, producing predictable cash flows. The company benefits from a substantial regulatory moat: status as a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS, inclusion in browser/OS root trust stores, and AATL/Microsoft/Adobe trust list inclusion are high barriers to entry built over 25+ years. Founded in 1996, it is one of the world's oldest certificate authorities with a diversified product mix across SSL/TLS, IoT identity, document signing, code signing, and S/MIME, serving enterprise, government, finance, healthcare, and energy verticals globally. Key risks include price pressure from free CAs (Let's Encrypt, ZeroSSL) compressing commodity DV SSL margins, shortening certificate lifetimes (industry move to ~47-day validity) increasing automation requirements, and existential trust-incident risk where any mis-issuance or audit failure could lead to root-store distrust events. Concentration in digital trust services makes the business vulnerable to technology shifts like post-quantum migration. Note that specific three-year financial figures could not be verified in the source report.
Key strengths: Strong, deep-pocketed parent (GMO Internet Group, TSE-listed), Recurring subscription revenue model with high renewal rates, Regulatory moat via eIDAS qualified trust status and root trust store inclusion, Diversified product portfolio across SSL/TLS, PKI, IoT, document/code signing, Global delivery footprint across EMEA, Americas, and APAC, 25+ year operating history as one of the oldest CAs, Blue-chip customer references (Microsoft, Cisco, J&J, AT&T)
Risk factors: Price pressure from free CAs (Let's Encrypt, ZeroSSL) on commodity SSL, Shortening certificate lifetimes (~47-day validity) pressuring unit economics, Trust-incident risk — mis-issuance could trigger root-store distrust, Concentration in digital trust vertical vulnerable to tech shifts (post-quantum, passwordless), FX and intra-group transfer-pricing exposure, Limited transparency at the Belgian entity level
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.