Glostrup Kommune Due Diligence
Run due diligence on Glostrup Kommune: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · glostrup.dk · 11 vendors
Glostrup Kommune is a Danish municipal authority located in the Capital Region of Denmark, west of Copenhagen. It provides a wide range of public services to its citizens, including social services, childcare, schools, environmental management, road infrastructure, and citizen administration. The municipality is governed by an elected municipal council (Kommunalbestyrelsen) and is headed by Mayor Kasper Damsgaard.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 64
- Digital Resilience: 6
- Financial Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Intel Corporation — Technology — United States
- KOMBIT A/S — Government & Public Sector — Denmark
- TeamViewer AG — Technology — Germany
- and 8 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-10-08 · revision 2
11 direct vendors, 172 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Ireland: 1
- Japan: 1
- Belgium: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- South Korea: 1
- Norway: 2
- Italy: 1
Migration Readiness: 4/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Glostrup Kommune exhibits medium migration readiness, leaning towards the lower end of this range due to several significant challenges. While ASP.NET Core is a modern framework that can support cloud-native development, the overall tech stack is not explicitly described as containerized or microservices-based, suggesting a potentially more traditional architecture. A major impediment to migration is the heavy reliance on deeply integrated national Danish public sector systems (borger.dk, virk.dk, MitID, Digital Post, CPR-registret, BBR), which are complex dependencies that would require extensive effort and coordination to migrate or re-platform. The use of a specific government CMS (GoPublic) and mention of 'Journalisation and case management systems (fagsystemer)' further suggest potentially bespoke or legacy systems that are difficult to move. The 'Medium' vendor lock-in risk also indicates challenges in switching providers or migrating away from existing solutions. Strict regulatory requirements (GDPR, NIS2 Directive) and explicit data residency expectations (Denmark/EU) impose significant constraints on cloud provider selection and migration strategies, adding complexity and cost. The absence of financial stability data prevents an assessment of the municipality's capacity to fund a large-scale migration. Opportunities for migration are limited but could leverage the modern aspects of ASP.NET Core for specific applications, provided the integration and regulatory hurdles can be effectively managed.
Compliance
9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
Environmental Protection Act — No public evidence
The Danish Environmental Protection Act (Miljøbeskyttelsesloven) assigns municipalities direct responsibilities for waste management, wastewater treatment, and supervision of polluting industries.
Evidence: https://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/publications/2001/87-7944-519-5/html/kap03_eng.htm, https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/environmental-law-2025/denmark, https://pub.norden.org/temanord2023-522/2-environmental-law-and-procedure-in-the-nordic-countries.html, https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/denmark-environment/?export-pdf, https://netzerocompare.com/policies/denmark-environmental-protection-act-pollution-control-and-enforcement-dk-miljobeskyttelsesloven, https://glostrupforsyning.dk/om-os/persondata/privatlivspolitik
Social Services Act — No public evidence
Danish municipalities are the primary entities responsible for providing a wide range of social welfare services to residents as mandated by the Social Services Act (Serviceloven).
Evidence: https://www.esn-eu.org/social-services-index/2024/denmark, https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/denmark/46-access-to-quality-services, https://disabilitysupport.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/easpd-denmark_fact_sheet_0.pdf, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_Social_Service_Law, https://www.glostrup.dk/borger/familie-og-boern/stoette-og-raadgivning/hvad-kan-vi-tilbyde, https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serviceloven
Local Government Act — No public evidence
The Danish Local Government Act (Kommunestyrelsesloven) applies to all municipalities in Denmark, defining their governance structure, responsibilities, and the rights of the local council.
Evidence: https://www.arl-international.com/knowledge/country-profiles/denmark/rev/3734, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/47, https://www.elections.im.dk/media/22544/act-on-local-government.pdf, https://www.elections.im.dk/local-elections/act-on-local-government-web-accessible, https://www.uaipit.com/en/documents-record?/5649, https://plesner.com/en/news/access-to-documents-in-public-files-is-a-key-consideration-when-sharing-information-with-public-authorities
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024: revenue DKK 1,924.7M, EBIT DKK 111.6M, equity DKK 862.1M
- 2023: revenue DKK 1,818.5M, EBIT DKK 89.4M, equity DKK 701.4M
- 2022: revenue DKK 1,843.5M, EBIT DKK 121.2M, equity DKK 734.5M
Financial Resilience Score: 8/10
Glostrup Kommune demonstrates strong financial resilience as a Danish municipality with a clean audit opinion from BDO for FY 2024. The municipality generated an operating surplus (resultat af ordinær driftsvirksomhed) of DKK 111.6M in 2024, with total income growing 5.8% to DKK 1,924.7M. Service spending came in DKK 34.3M below the sanction threshold, avoiding regulatory penalties, and the average 365-day cash balance of DKK 181.0M comfortably exceeded the municipality's own target of DKK 109.3M (6% of net operating expenses). The balance sheet strengthened materially in 2024, with equity increasing 22.9% to DKK 862.1M and total assets up 8.4% to DKK 1,912.9M. The underlying tax base grew approximately 18.7% over five years (DKK 4,167.7M to DKK 4,946.5M), supported by population growth from 23,652 to 24,861 inhabitants during 2024. Long-term debt remained stable at DKK 238.6M, and the 2027 budget settlement includes DKK 36M of planned debt reduction. Key risks include substantial contingent liabilities of approximately DKK 2.77 billion in guarantees (including a DKK 638.0M joint-and-several liability for Udbetaling Danmark loans), pension obligations of DKK 533.4M, and ongoing expenditure pressure on specialised areas (specialundervisning, elderly care, health). The Letbane capital commitment carries joint-and-several insolvency risk despite zero carrying value.
Key strengths: Clean audit opinion from BDO with no critical remarks for FY 2024, Operating surplus of DKK 111.6M in 2024, up from DKK 89.4M in 2023, Average cash balance of DKK 181.0M, well above internal target of DKK 109.3M, Equity strengthened 22.9% to DKK 862.1M in 2024, Growing population (+1,209 in 2024) and tax base (+18.7% over 5 years), Service spending DKK 34.3M below sanction threshold, Stable long-term debt at DKK 238.6M with planned DKK 36M reduction in 2027
Risk factors: Contingent liabilities of approximately DKK 2.77 billion in guarantees, DKK 638.0M joint-and-several liability for Udbetaling Danmark loans, Pension obligations of DKK 533.4M (tjenestemandspension), Expenditure pressure on specialundervisning and elderly/health areas, Ring 3 Letbane joint-and-several insolvency liability (DKK 105.0M paid in), Continued investment pressure requiring DKK 10-14M annual compensating savings
Revenue by geography
- Denmark: 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Kommunal indkomstskat (personal income tax): 63.2%
- Statstilskud, udligning og special tilskud: 20%
- Grundskyld (land tax): 8.3%
- Selskabsskatter (corporate tax share): 5.5%
- Anden skat på fast ejendom (dækningsafgift): 2.9%
- Anden skat: 0.1%
Workforce by country
- Denmark: 1973
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.