Golf Index
golfindex.io · 9 vendors
Golf Index is a golf performance analytics platform that helps golfers analyze and improve their game. The platform offers a performance dashboard, skill improvement tracking, and training plan features. It reports over 10,000 users and 500,000+ data points tracked.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 5
Disruption prediction
Golf Index has an estimated 17% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
7 of Golf Index's 9 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- HubSpot, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 7 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-03-15 · revision 2
9 direct vendors, 183 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 7
- Poland: 1
- United Kingdom: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Austria: 1
- Norway: 3
- Germany: 4
Migration Readiness: 6/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Golf Index's migration readiness is moderate, primarily bolstered by its modern technology stack. The use of Next.js suggests a contemporary development approach that is generally well-suited for cloud-native deployments, containerization, and microservices architectures, facilitating a smoother transition. The absence of explicit data residency requirements is also a significant advantage, removing a common and complex hurdle for cloud migration. However, several critical unknowns present substantial challenges. The financial stability of Golf Index, including its ability to fund a potentially costly migration, cannot be assessed due to a lack of revenue and growth data. The regulatory environment, specifically the applicability and implications of NIS2, remains undetermined; this could introduce unforeseen compliance requirements and complexities during migration. Most critically, the vendor lock-in risk is unknown. While 21 services are utilized, the actual number of distinct vendors is unclear (conflicting "Total Vendors: 0" with "Total Services: 21"), and without this information, along with contract details, it's impossible to gauge the potential for vendor lock-in, which can significantly increase the cost and complexity of migration. These uncertainties necessitate further investigation to accurately plan and execute a migration strategy.
Compliance
3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
GDPR (source) — Assessment Required
GDPR carries severe financial penalties (up to 4% of annual global turnover or €20M, whichever is higher) and applies to any organization processing personal data of EU/EEA residents. Given that Golf Index appears to be a digital platform that likely collects user performance data, location data, and personal information from golfers, GDPR compliance is critical if they have any EU users. The risk is high due to the severity of penalties and the likelihood that a golf analytics platform would process personal data.
SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required
SOC2 is relevant for cloud-based service providers handling customer data, which Golf Index appears to be as a digital analytics platform. While not legally mandated, SOC2 compliance is often required by enterprise customers and demonstrates security controls. Risk is medium as lack of SOC2 could limit business opportunities but doesn't carry legal penalties.
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
ISO 27001 is an international standard for information security management systems. For a digital platform handling user data, ISO 27001 certification demonstrates robust security practices and is often required by enterprise customers. Risk is medium as it's not legally mandated but important for business credibility and customer trust.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.