Helsingør Kommune Due Diligence
Run due diligence on Helsingør Kommune: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · helsingor.dk · 23 vendors
Helsingør Kommune is the municipal government of Helsingør (Elsinore), a city in the North Zealand region of Denmark. It provides a wide range of public services to residents and businesses, including citizen services, childcare, schools, social welfare, healthcare, urban planning, and environmental management. The municipality is governed by an elected city council and is headquartered at Rådhuset (City Hall), Stengade 59, 3000 Helsingør.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 65
- Digital Resilience: 7
- Financial Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- GoPublic A/S — Technology — Denmark
- Prokom AS — Norway
- Ubivox ApS — Technology — Denmark
- and 20 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-10-08 · revision 3
23 direct vendors, 248 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Australia: 1
- United States: 5
- Denmark: 10
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 9
- New Zealand: 2
- Cyprus: 1
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Helsingør Kommune exhibits a medium level of migration readiness, with notable challenges stemming from its core tech stack and regulatory environment. A primary hurdle is the heavy reliance on specialized, deeply integrated Danish public sector systems such as KMD and KOMBIT. These large-scale ERP/case management platforms are typically monolithic and complex, making them challenging and costly to refactor or migrate to modern cloud-native, microservices-based architectures. Additionally, national infrastructures like Digital Post and MitID/NemID are essential components that are not subject to migration but require careful integration planning. The regulatory landscape, including GDPR, NIS2 (as an 'Essential entity'), and Danish national laws, imposes strict compliance requirements on data handling, security, and likely data residency (within Denmark or the EU). These regulations add significant complexity to cloud migration strategies, potentially limiting choices of cloud providers and regions. While the overall 'vendor lock-in risk' is assessed as low due to a diverse base of 20 vendors, the deep technical integration with specific public sector platforms represents a form of technical lock-in that would be difficult to untangle during a migration. On the positive side, the use of Microsoft 365 suggests some familiarity with cloud-based services. The diverse vendor base also offers flexibility in selecting migration partners. However, the absence of financial stability data prevents an assessment of the organization's capacity to fund a potentially large-scale and complex migration effort.
Compliance
4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence
ISO 27001 is a best-practice standard for information security. For Danish public authorities, especially those classified as essential under NIS2, implementing an ISMS based on ISO 27001 is a common method to demonstrate compliance and manage cyber risks.
Evidence: https://www.kl.dk/media/rojd4u0o/informationssikkerhed-i-kommunerne-jan-2024.pdf, https://www.pwc.dk/da/services/consulting/cyber-transformation/viden/iso27001.html, https://responsemate.dk/frameworks/isae-3000.html, https://www.rsm.global/denmark/en/service/isae-3000-assurance-reports, https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Accountancy-Europe-NFI-assurance-practice_facthseet.pdf
NIS2 (source) — No public evidence
Denmark's implementation of the NIS2 Directive explicitly includes municipalities as 'essential entities'. As a public administration body in Denmark, Helsingør Kommune falls directly within the scope of this cybersecurity regulation.
GDPR (source) — Evidence found
Helsingør Kommune is a public authority established in Denmark (an EU member state) and, as such, is directly subject to the General Data Protection Regulation for all processing of personal data concerning citizens, employees, and suppliers.
Evidence: https://www.topograph.co/companies/dk/helsing-r-stiftsadministration-21738018, https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dtime%2Bin%2BUnited%2BStates%2Bof%2BAmerica&q=EhAqBdAUBhsnC6Ppcln0026UGNWsntYGIjD4pTF1bpG1lPpkMtD8eZBiM2lgJ_JYTgDrDsYSrfDVu8APWlB2pGuZ0hdhQn5vCnoyAnJSWgFDYNv4rO7Uk43fjQE, https://eng.mst.dk/industry/permits-and-inspections/environmental-inspection/danish-regulations, https://netzerocompare.com/policies/denmark-land-use-planning-act-dk-land-use-planning, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/afgoerelser/afgoerelser/2022/jul/datatilsynet-nedlaegger-behandlingsforbud-i-chromebook-sag-, https://cphpost.dk/2026-10-02/news/round-up/eu-countries-to-discuss-coordinated-response-to-rising-fuel-prices-after-us-pressure/
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: revenue DKK 5.30B, EBIT DKK 218.2M
- 2024: revenue DKK 5.05B, EBIT DKK 212.5M
Financial Resilience Score: 7/10
Helsingør Kommune demonstrates solid financial resilience as a mid-sized Danish municipality in the wealthy Capital Region with ~64,000 inhabitants and total budgeted income of DKK 5.3B in 2025. The municipality is actively deleveraging, with long-term debt projected to fall from DKK 501.4M end-2024 to DKK 250.7M end-2028, and borrows from KommuneKredit (effectively AAA-equivalent sovereign-backed Danish municipal lender). A clear multi-year Økonomisk Politik targets an average kassebeholdning of DKK 320M by 2029, with a stepped build-up from DKK 200M in 2025 to DKK 300M in 2028. The municipality benefits from positive demographics, population growth, growing tourism, a diversified business base, and low unemployment. Budgeted operating surplus (Resultat af ordinær driftsvirksomhed) is projected to grow from DKK 213M in 2024 to DKK 278M in 2028, providing growing capacity to fund investments and debt repayment. However, the 2025 budget was adopted under 'a critical economic situation' due to the new boligbeskatningssystem (property tax reform), which reduced expected revenues by approximately DKK 300M annually in 2025-2027. The municipality responded with savings of DKK 82.7M in 2025 rising to DKK 108.4M in 2028, a 0.3pp income tax increase to 25.82%, and received DKK 49.6M one-off state compensation. Structural pressures on specialized social services, workforce shortages, and ageing demographics (80+ group projected to grow ~40%) represent ongoing challenges.
Key strengths: Diversified tax base with DKK 5.3B total income in 2025, Active deleveraging: long-term debt declining from DKK 501M (2024) to DKK 251M (2028), AAA-equivalent borrowing via KommuneKredit, Clear economic policy with DKK 320M liquidity target by 2029, Growing operating surplus from DKK 213M to DKK 278M (2024-2028), Positive population growth and low unemployment, Income tax rate increased 0.3pp to 25.82% in 2025
Risk factors: New property tax reform reducing revenues by ~DKK 300M annually in 2025-2027, Structural cost pressure on specialized social services (DKK 18M lift for adults in 2025), Service-ramme sanctions tied to DKK 3B of state block grant, Ageing demographics with 80+ group projected to grow ~40%, Workforce shortages affecting service delivery, 100% revenue concentration in Denmark with no geographic diversification, 73% revenue dependence on personal income tax creating employment sensitivity
Revenue by geography
- Denmark: 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Indkomstskat (Personal Income Tax): 72.9%
- Tilskud og udligning (State Grants/Equalisation): 14.3%
- Grundskyld (Land Tax): 11.2%
- Selskabsskatter (Corporate Tax Share): 1.2%
- Dækningsafgift (Property Services Charge): 0.4%
- Andre skatter (Other Taxes): 0.1%
Workforce by country
- Denmark: 4750
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.